Governance Effectiveness Rating 2021
Governance Effectiveness Rating assesses the quality of public services and government policy implementation.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
- #1
Finland - #2
Denmark - #3
Singapore - #4
Switzerland - #5
Norway - #6
Luxembourg - #7
Sweden - #8
Netherlands - #9
Iceland - #10
Andorra
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #205
South Sudan - #204
Somalia - #203
Haiti - #202
Yemen - #201
Congo, Democratic Republic of the - #200
Afghanistan - #199
Central African Republic - #198
Syrian Arab Republic - #197
Myanmar - #196
Libya
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2021, Finland leads the world in the Governance Effectiveness Rating with a score of 95.74, while the global range spans from a low of 16.84 in Afghanistan to Finland's high. The global average for this rating stands at 53.99, providing a benchmark for assessing the quality of public services and government policy implementation across 200 countries.
Excellence in Governance: Leaders and Their Strategies
The top performers in the Governance Effectiveness Rating are predominantly from Europe, with Finland, Denmark (95.57), and Switzerland (94.10) setting the standard. These countries are renowned for their robust public administration systems, transparency, and effective policy frameworks. For instance, Finland's success is often attributed to its comprehensive welfare state and high levels of trust in public institutions. Similarly, Singapore (95.00) stands out as a non-European leader due to its efficient government and strategic urban planning, which have been pivotal in its rapid development.
Challenges at the Bottom: Factors Affecting Low Ratings
At the other end of the spectrum, countries like Afghanistan (16.84), the Central African Republic (18.66), and Syria (19.35) face significant challenges. These nations are often impacted by ongoing conflicts, political instability, and weak institutional frameworks, which hinder effective governance. For instance, Afghanistan's low score reflects the impact of prolonged conflict and recent political upheaval, which have disrupted public service delivery and policy implementation.
Year-over-Year Trends: Movers and Shakers
Examining the year-over-year changes in Governance Effectiveness Ratings reveals significant shifts. Uzbekistan experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 9.03 points, marking a 23.7% improvement. This can be attributed to economic reforms and efforts to strengthen governance structures. Conversely, Myanmar saw the most substantial decrease of -8.08 points, a -29.4% decline, largely due to political turmoil following the military coup, which severely disrupted governance mechanisms.
Policy Implications and Future Outlook
The Governance Effectiveness Rating provides critical insights into the effectiveness of government operations worldwide. High ratings often correlate with stable political environments, effective public service delivery, and strong institutional frameworks. Countries like Luxembourg (92.06) and Sweden (91.88) exemplify how policy consistency and public trust can drive governance success. Looking forward, nations aiming to improve their ratings might focus on enhancing transparency, strengthening institutions, and fostering civic engagement to boost public confidence and policy implementation efficacy.
Frequently Asked Questions About Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021
Which country had the highest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021?
Finland had the highest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021, with a score of 95.74.
What was the average Governance Effectiveness Rating across all countries in 2021?
The average Governance Effectiveness Rating across all 205 countries in 2021 was 52.93.
Which country had the lowest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021?
South Sudan had the lowest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021, with a score of 5.03.
What was the median Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021?
The median Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021 was 51.98.
Can you list the top 3 countries with the highest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021?
The top 3 countries with the highest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021 were Finland (95.74), Denmark (95.57), and Singapore (95).
What is the range of Governance Effectiveness Ratings in 2021?
The range of Governance Effectiveness Ratings in 2021 spans from South Sudan's 5.03 to Finland's 95.74.
Insights by country
Guinea
In 2021, Guinea had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 35.4355908, ranking #166 out of 205 countries. This rating is significantly lower than the regional average for West Africa, indicating challenges in governance compared to its neighbors. Key factors contributing to Guinea's low rating include political instability, limited institutional capacity, and ongoing economic difficulties that hinder effective governance.
Lithuania
In 2021, Lithuania achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 72.4466859, ranking #36 out of 205 countries. This rating is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Lithuania's robust democratic institutions and effective public administration. Key drivers of this effectiveness include Lithuania's commitment to EU integration and strong anti-corruption measures, which have fostered a stable political environment and improved governance outcomes.
Tuvalu
In 2021, Tuvalu achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 43.2764842, ranking #140 out of 205 countries. This rating reflects challenges faced by Tuvalu compared to regional neighbors, as many Pacific island nations struggle with similar governance issues. Key drivers of Tuvalu's rating include its limited economic resources, vulnerability to climate change, and a small population that complicates administrative efficiency.
Eritrea
Eritrea's Governance Effectiveness Rating for 2021 is 22.377964, placing it at #192 out of 205 countries. This rating is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in governance compared to more stable nations. Key drivers of this low rating include a lack of political pluralism, restricted civil liberties, and ongoing economic difficulties, which hinder effective governance and public service delivery.
North Korea
In 2021, North Korea had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 21.3817116, ranking #193 out of 205 countries. This rating places North Korea among the lowest globally, significantly below the regional average for East Asia. The country's governance challenges stem from its authoritarian regime, economic isolation, and lack of transparency, which hinder effective policy implementation and public trust.
Mauritania
Mauritania's Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2021 is 35.3893054, placing it at #167 out of 205 countries. This rating reflects significant challenges compared to regional neighbors, with countries like Senegal ranking much higher in governance metrics. Key drivers of Mauritania's low rating include ongoing political instability and limited institutional capacity, which hinder effective governance and public service delivery.
Pakistan
In 2021, Pakistan achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 43.7468603, ranking #132 out of 205 countries. This rating is notably lower than the regional average for South Asia, reflecting challenges in governance compared to neighbors like India, which ranks higher. Key drivers of this rating include political instability, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and ongoing security concerns, which hinder effective policy implementation and public service delivery.
Mozambique
In 2021, Mozambique had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 35.0184533, ranking #169 out of 205 countries. This rating places Mozambique near the bottom tier of global governance effectiveness, significantly lower than regional peers like South Africa, which ranks higher in governance metrics. Key factors contributing to Mozambique's low rating include ongoing political instability, economic challenges, and issues related to corruption and public service delivery.
Malta
In 2021, Malta achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 75.6140162, ranking #32 out of 205 countries. This rating positions Malta above the global average, reflecting its relatively stable political environment and efficient public services compared to lower-ranked nations. Key drivers of this effectiveness include Malta's strategic location in the Mediterranean, which enhances trade opportunities, and a strong legal framework that supports business and investment.
Palau
In 2021, Palau achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 51.4156875, ranking #108 out of 205 countries. This rating is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in governance compared to higher-ranked nations. Key drivers of this rating include Palau's small population and limited economic diversity, which can hinder the implementation of effective governance policies and resource allocation.
Data Source
Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) | Data
The World Bank provides the Governance Effectiveness indicator, which measures the quality of public services, the capacity of the civil service, and the degree of its independence from political pressures. The scores range from 0 to 100, reflecting the effectiveness of governance in various countries.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Governance Effectiveness Rating data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data