State of Palestine Governance Effectiveness Rating 2025: 25.38
State of Palestine's governance effectiveness rating in 2025 is 25.38, up 1.8% from 2024. It ranks #189 of 205 countries.
Governance Effectiveness Rating assesses the quality of public services and government policy implementation.
Source (2025): Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) | Data
Governance Effectiveness Rating over time
| Year | Value | Change | % Change | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25.38 | +0.45 | +1.80% | |
| 2024 | 24.93 | 1.22 | -4.68% | |
| 2023 | 26.16 | 6.19 | -19.14% | |
| 2022 | 32.34 | 0.94 | -2.81% | |
| 2021 | 33.28 | 3.33 | -9.09% | |
| 2020 | 36.61 | 0.1 | -0.28% | |
| 2019 | 36.71 | 3.18 | -7.97% | |
| 2018 | 39.89 | 4.73 | -10.60% | |
| 2017 | 44.62 | +3.76 | +9.19% | |
| 2016 | 40.86 | 1.13 | -2.69% | |
| 2015 | 41.99 | 0.86 | -2.00% | |
| 2014 | 42.85 | +3.63 | +9.26% | |
| 2013 | 39.22 | +0.11 | +0.27% | |
| 2012 | 39.11 | 0.39 | -0.98% | |
| 2011 | 39.5 | 3.89 | -8.97% | |
| 2010 | 43.39 | +1.86 | +4.49% | |
| 2009 | 41.52 | +3.9 | +10.37% | |
| 2008 | 37.62 | +1.3 | +3.59% | |
| 2007 | 36.32 | +1.57 | +4.51% | |
| 2006 | 34.75 | +1.76 | +5.33% | |
| 2005 | 32.99 | 9.74 | -22.79% | |
| 2004 | 42.73 | +18.29 | +74.83% | |
| 2003 | 24.44 | 0.08 | -0.32% | |
| 2002 | 24.52 | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions About State of Palestine Governance Effectiveness Rating
What is State of Palestine's governance effectiveness rating in 2025?▾
State of Palestine's governance effectiveness rating is 25.38 in 2025, according to Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) | Data.
Is State of Palestine's governance effectiveness rating increasing or decreasing?▾
State of Palestine's governance effectiveness rating rose by 1.8% from 2024 (24.93) to 2025 (25.38). Over the past decade (2015–2025) it fell by 39.6%.
How does State of Palestine rank for governance effectiveness rating?▾
In 2025, State of Palestine has the 189th highest governance effectiveness rating out of 205 countries with data.
What was State of Palestine's governance effectiveness rating in 2002?▾
In 2002, State of Palestine's governance effectiveness rating was 24.52. By 2025 it rose by 3.5%.
Explore additional statistical insights
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country in State of Palestine
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
Currently married (Percent) in State of Palestine
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars in State of Palestine
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
Human Capital Index in State of Palestine
The Human Capital Index measures a country's investment in education and health, reflecting its potential for economic growth and productivity. This vital statistic highlights the importance of nurturing human resources for sustainable development.
Life expectancy at birth in State of Palestine
Life expectancy at birth measures the average years a newborn is expected to live, reflecting a country's health standards and quality of life. This vital statistic highlights disparities in healthcare and living conditions across nations, making it essential for global health assessments.
Median age of population in State of Palestine
The median age of a population is a key demographic indicator, reflecting the age distribution within a country. Understanding median age helps assess economic development, healthcare needs, and social dynamics. Countries with a higher median age may face challenges related to aging populations, while younger populations often indicate growth potential.