Governance Effectiveness Rating 2019

Slovenia

In 2019, Slovenia achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 77.6341145, ranking #29 out of 205 countries. This rating places Slovenia above the global average, reflecting its strong institutional capacity compared to lower-ranked countries. Key drivers include Slovenia's stable political environment and well-developed public sector, which contribute to effective governance and policy implementation.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

In 2019, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 63.507257, ranking #64 out of 205 countries. This rating is above the regional average for the Caribbean, indicating relatively strong governance compared to some neighboring nations. Factors contributing to this effectiveness include stable political institutions and a commitment to democratic processes, which have fostered public trust and engagement in governance.

Ukraine

In 2019, Ukraine had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 44.4163107, ranking #133 out of 205 countries. This score is notably below the global average, reflecting challenges in governance compared to neighboring countries like Poland, which has a more robust governance framework. Factors contributing to Ukraine's rating include ongoing political instability, economic reforms, and the impact of conflict in the eastern regions, which have hindered effective governance and institutional development.

Republic of Moldova

In 2019, the Republic of Moldova achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 48.2692268, ranking #122 out of 205 countries. This score is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in governance compared to higher-ranked nations like Norway, which typically leads in this metric. Key drivers of Moldova's governance effectiveness include ongoing political instability, economic difficulties, and a complex relationship with neighboring countries, which hinder policy implementation and institutional trust.

Qatar

In 2019, Qatar achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 68.9954823, ranking #47 out of 205 countries. This rating is notably higher than many regional neighbors, reflecting Qatar's strong institutional frameworks and public sector management. Key drivers of this effectiveness include its substantial hydrocarbon wealth, which supports robust public services, and a relatively small population that allows for more efficient governance. Additionally, Qatar's strategic investments in infrastructure and education have bolstered its governance capacity.

Togo

Togo's Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2019 was 35.1067932, placing it at #175 out of 205 countries. This score is significantly lower than the global average, indicating challenges in public service delivery and regulatory quality. Factors contributing to Togo's rating include political instability, limited economic resources, and governance issues that hinder effective policy implementation.

Nauru

Nauru achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 50.9884262 in 2019, ranking #110 out of 205 countries. This rating is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in governance compared to more stable nations. Contributing factors to Nauru's rating include its small population and reliance on phosphate mining, which has led to economic instability and limited capacity for effective governance.

Eswatini

In 2019, Eswatini had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 41.8663509, ranking #150 out of 205 countries. This rating is notably lower than the African average, indicating significant governance challenges within the nation.

The key drivers of this low rating include limited political pluralism and ongoing socio-economic issues, which hinder effective governance. Additionally, Eswatini's status as an absolute monarchy restricts public participation in decision-making processes, further impacting governance effectiveness.

Luxembourg

In 2019, Luxembourg achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 93.2740127, ranking #5 out of 205 countries. This rating is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Luxembourg's strong institutional framework and public sector performance. Key drivers of this effectiveness include its robust legal system, a high level of transparency, and a stable political environment, all of which contribute to effective governance.

Monaco

In 2019, Monaco achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 89.0903832, ranking #13 out of 205 countries. This places Monaco well above the global average, reflecting its stable political environment and effective public administration. Key drivers of this high rating include its robust financial sector, which benefits from favorable tax policies, and a small population that allows for more efficient governance and public services.