Governance Effectiveness Rating 2018
Governance Effectiveness Rating assesses the quality of public services and government policy implementation.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #205
South Sudan - #204
Somalia - #203
Yemen - #202
Haiti - #201
Afghanistan - #200
Central African Republic - #199
Libya - #198
Sudan - #197
Syrian Arab Republic - #196
Venezuela
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Switzerland led the world in the Governance Effectiveness Rating for 2018, achieving the highest score of 95.87, while the global range spanned from 19.62 to 95.87. The average Governance Effectiveness Rating across 200 countries was 55.08, indicating a moderate level of governance quality worldwide.
Top Performers in Governance Effectiveness
The countries at the forefront of the Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018 were predominantly from Europe and Asia. Switzerland, with a score of 95.87, exemplified exceptional governance characterized by efficient public services and sound policy implementation. Following closely were Finland (95.46) and Singapore (94.45), both noted for their robust institutional frameworks and transparency.
These countries' high rankings can often be attributed to their stable political environments and strong legal frameworks, which foster effective governance. For instance, Singapore is renowned for its anti-corruption measures and efficient bureaucracy, contributing to its elevated score.
Challenges in Governance Among Low-Scoring Nations
At the opposite end of the spectrum, the Central African Republic scored the lowest with 19.62, highlighting significant governance challenges. Other countries such as Libya (20.30) and Sudan (20.49) also faced severe governance issues, often exacerbated by internal conflicts and political instability.
The low scores in these nations are typically linked to weak institutional structures and pervasive corruption. For example, the ongoing civil unrest in Libya has severely undermined public service delivery and policy execution, reflected in its low rating.
Shifts in Governance Effectiveness: Year-over-Year Trends
While the average change in Governance Effectiveness Rating was a slight decrease of -0.09 points or -0.3% globally, some countries experienced significant fluctuations. Nauru and Palau both saw increases of 6.71 points, representing improvements of 13.2% and 14.8% respectively. These gains can often be linked to reforms aimed at enhancing governmental transparency and efficiency.
Conversely, Venezuela experienced the most substantial decline of -8.12 points, a stark -28.1% drop. This decline is largely due to the country's ongoing economic crisis and political turmoil, which have severely impacted governmental operations and policy implementation.
Economic and Policy Drivers of Governance Effectiveness
Economic conditions play a crucial role in shaping governance effectiveness. Wealthier nations like Luxembourg (92.42) and Norway (91.97) benefit from substantial resources to invest in public services, enhancing their governance ratings. These countries often prioritize education, healthcare, and infrastructure, which are key components of effective governance.
Policy decisions, particularly those related to governance reforms, also significantly impact ratings. Countries that have implemented anti-corruption measures and improved bureaucratic efficiency, such as Singapore, often score higher. Conversely, nations with stagnant or regressive policies, like Venezuela, tend to fall in ratings.
In conclusion, the Governance Effectiveness Rating for 2018 reveals a complex interplay of economic, political, and policy factors influencing governance quality worldwide. While top-performing countries benefit from stable economies and strong institutions, those at the bottom face challenges exacerbated by conflict and poor governance practices. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to enhance governance effectiveness globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018
Which country had the highest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018?
Switzerland had the highest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018, with a score of 95.87.
What was the lowest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018 and which country had it?
The lowest Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018 was 8.72, recorded by South Sudan.
What was the average Governance Effectiveness Rating across all countries in 2018?
The average Governance Effectiveness Rating across all countries in 2018 was 54.07.
What was the median Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018?
The median Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018 was 52.23.
Which countries were in the top 3 for Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018?
The top 3 countries for Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018 were Switzerland, Finland, and Singapore.
How many countries were included in the Governance Effectiveness Rating dataset for 2018?
The dataset for the Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2018 included 205 countries.
Insights by country
Bangladesh
In 2018, Bangladesh achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 41.6215826, ranking #154 out of 205 countries. This rating is notably lower than regional neighbors like India, which reflects challenges in bureaucratic efficiency and public service delivery. Contributing factors to this rating include political instability, frequent natural disasters, and a developing economy that strains governance structures.
Afghanistan
In 2018, Afghanistan had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 19.433953, ranking #201 out of 205 countries. This rating places Afghanistan near the bottom of the global scale, significantly lower than regional neighbors who often score above 50. The country's prolonged conflict, weak institutional frameworks, and limited public service delivery have severely hindered effective governance and contributed to this low rating.
Guatemala
In 2018, Guatemala achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 40.5509621, ranking #158 out of 205 countries. This rating places Guatemala below many of its Central American neighbors, reflecting significant challenges in governance compared to countries such as Costa Rica, which ranks much higher. Key drivers of this low rating include ongoing political instability, corruption issues, and inadequate public service delivery, which hinder effective governance and public trust.
Denmark
In 2018, Denmark achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 92.0553927, ranking #6 out of 205 countries. This score is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Denmark's strong institutional framework and low levels of corruption. Key drivers of this effectiveness include a robust welfare state, high levels of public trust in government, and transparent policymaking processes.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 40.175566 in 2018, ranking #161 out of 205 countries. This rating is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting ongoing challenges in governance and institutional effectiveness. Key drivers of this rating include political instability, a complex government structure stemming from the Dayton Agreement, and economic difficulties that hinder effective policy implementation.
Chad
In 2018, Chad had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 27.4383017, ranking #190 out of 205 countries. This rating places Chad significantly below the global average, reflecting challenges faced by the nation in governance compared to higher-ranked countries like Norway, which is often cited as a model of effective governance. Key drivers of Chad's low rating include persistent political instability, corruption, and limited access to basic services, which hinder effective policy implementation and citizen engagement.
Seychelles
Seychelles achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 65.493484 in 2018, ranking #56 out of 205 countries. This rating is notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting a relatively stable political environment and effective public administration. Key drivers of this performance include the country's small population, which facilitates more direct governance, and its focus on sustainable tourism, which bolsters economic stability and supports governance structures.
Solomon Islands
In 2018, the Solomon Islands had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 29.4302456, ranking #186 out of 205 countries. This rating is significantly lower than the global average, indicating challenges in governance compared to many other nations. Factors contributing to this low rating include political instability, limited infrastructure development, and a reliance on subsistence agriculture, which hinder effective governance and public service delivery.
Laos
In 2018, Laos had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 39.1375497, ranking #163 out of 205 countries. This rating places Laos below the regional average for Southeast Asia, where countries like Thailand and Vietnam typically score higher. Key drivers of this low rating include ongoing challenges in political stability and limited public sector capacity, which hinder effective governance and economic development.
Kazakhstan
In 2018, Kazakhstan achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 48.3614026, ranking #115 out of 205 countries. This rating is below the regional average for Central Asia, indicating challenges in governance compared to neighboring countries. Factors contributing to this rating include a heavily centralized political system and ongoing economic reforms that have yet to fully enhance institutional effectiveness and public sector performance.
Data Source
Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100) | Data
The World Bank provides the Governance Effectiveness indicator, which measures the quality of public services, the capacity of the civil service, and the degree of its independence from political pressures. The scores range from 0 to 100, reflecting the effectiveness of governance in various countries.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Governance Effectiveness Rating data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data