Governance Effectiveness Rating 2012

Eswatini

In 2012, Eswatini achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 46.693704, ranking #112 out of 203 countries. This rating is below the African regional average, indicating challenges in governance compared to its neighbors. Factors contributing to this rating include political instability and limited public participation in decision-making processes, which have historically impacted policy implementation and public trust in government.

Mozambique

In 2012, Mozambique had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 42.9340833, ranking #132 out of 203 countries. This rating is notably lower than the regional average for Southern Africa, which reflects challenges in governance across the area. Key drivers of Mozambique's rating include ongoing economic instability, a history of conflict, and significant corruption issues that have hindered effective policy implementation.

Aruba

In 2012, Aruba achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 70.1409356, ranking #42 out of 203 countries. This rating is notably higher than the global average, reflecting strong institutional performance compared to many Caribbean neighbors. Key drivers of Aruba's effective governance include its stable political environment and proactive economic policies that promote tourism and foreign investment.

Niger

Niger's Governance Effectiveness Rating in 2012 was 38.7706255, ranking it #154 out of 203 countries. This score is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in governance compared to higher-ranked nations. Key drivers of this rating include ongoing political instability, limited infrastructure development, and economic constraints that hinder effective policy implementation.

Pakistan

In 2012, Pakistan had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 41.2483541, placing it at #140 out of 203 countries. This rating is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in governance compared to higher-ranked nations like Norway, which consistently leads in this metric. Key factors contributing to Pakistan's rating include political instability, economic difficulties, and issues related to law enforcement and public service delivery.

Albania

In 2012, Albania achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 46.9131364, ranking #111 out of 203 countries. This rating is notably lower than the regional average for Southeast Europe, reflecting challenges in governance and public administration. Key drivers of this rating include a history of political instability and economic transition, which have hindered effective policy implementation and institutional development.

Costa Rica

Costa Rica achieved a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 64.0029832 in 2012, ranking #58 out of 203 countries. This rating reflects a relatively strong governance structure compared to many of its Central American neighbors, where political instability often hampers effective governance.

Key drivers of Costa Rica's performance include its long-standing democratic institutions and a focus on social welfare policies, which have fostered political stability and public trust. Additionally, the country's commitment to environmental sustainability has attracted international support and investment, further enhancing its governance framework.

Laos

In 2012, Laos had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 35.2080672, ranking #164 out of 203 countries. This position places Laos below many of its Southeast Asian neighbors, indicating significant governance challenges compared to countries like Thailand, which ranks higher. Key factors contributing to this rating include limited political pluralism, a centralized government structure, and ongoing economic development issues that hinder effective governance.

Nicaragua

Nicaragua had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 39.8037989 in 2012, ranking #149 out of 203 countries. This rating reflects significant challenges compared to regional neighbors, as countries like Costa Rica rank substantially higher in governance metrics. Key drivers of Nicaragua's low effectiveness include political instability, economic constraints, and a history of governance issues that hinder institutional development and public service delivery.

Cameroon

In 2012, Cameroon had a Governance Effectiveness Rating of 36.8413623, ranking #157 out of 203 countries. This rating is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in governance compared to higher-ranked nations like Norway, which consistently ranks at the top. Factors contributing to Cameroon's rating include political instability, limited public sector capacity, and ongoing corruption issues, which hinder effective policy implementation and service delivery.