Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) 2011
Top FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP highlight countries attracting significant foreign investments relative to their economy size.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cayman Islands | 743.701 % | |
2 | Liechtenstein | 460.214 % | |
3 | Cyprus | 151.737 % | |
4 | Liberia | 86.989 % | |
5 | Malta | 79.749 % | |
6 | Mongolia | 43.912 % | |
7 | Netherlands | 39.041 % | |
8 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 38.684 % | |
9 | Belgium | 31.037 % | |
10 | Mozambique | 25.062 % | |
11 | Sierra Leone | 19.551 % | |
12 | Aruba | 18.506 % | |
13 | Singapore | 17.596 % | |
14 | New Caledonia | 16.985 % | |
15 | Maldives | 15.266 % | |
16 | Luxembourg | 14.333 % | |
17 | Sao Tome and Principe | 14.198 % | |
18 | Guinea | 14.091 % | |
19 | Seychelles | 13.527 % | |
20 | Togo | 13.439 % | |
21 | Montenegro | 12.351 % | |
22 | Panama | 12.317 % | |
23 | Niger | 12.165 % | |
24 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.858 % | |
25 | Turkmenistan | 11.6 % | |
26 | Solomon Islands | 11.284 % | |
27 | Kyrgyzstan | 11.065 % | |
28 | Grenada | 11.035 % | |
29 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 10.586 % | |
30 | Chile | 10.49 % | |
31 | Ireland | 9.835 % | |
32 | Serbia | 9.62 % | |
33 | Cambodia | 9.598 % | |
34 | Nicaragua | 9.579 % | |
35 | Dominica | 9.485 % | |
36 | Equatorial Guinea | 9.247 % | |
37 | Mauritania | 8.703 % | |
38 | Barbados | 8.261 % | |
39 | Ghana | 8.256 % | |
40 | Albania | 8.083 % | |
41 | Vanuatu | 7.936 % | |
42 | Lebanon | 7.857 % | |
43 | Georgia | 7.561 % | |
44 | Hungary | 7.454 % | |
45 | Iceland | 7.191 % | |
46 | Kazakhstan | 7.144 % | |
47 | Madagascar | 7.06 % | |
48 | Malawi | 6.978 % | |
49 | Azerbaijan | 6.801 % | |
50 | Guyana | 6.686 % | |
51 | Bahamas | 6.62 % | |
52 | Belarus | 6.48 % | |
53 | Armenia | 6.441 % | |
54 | Namibia | 6.417 % | |
55 | Costa Rica | 6.392 % | |
56 | Djibouti | 6.375 % | |
57 | Saint Lucia | 6.195 % | |
58 | Gabon | 6.17 % | |
59 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 6.047 % | |
60 | Honduras | 5.887 % | |
61 | Fiji | 5.746 % | |
62 | Latvia | 5.718 % | |
63 | Slovakia | 5.448 % | |
64 | Antigua and Barbuda | 5.409 % | |
65 | Austria | 5.358 % | |
66 | Uruguay | 5.344 % | |
67 | Belize | 5.206 % | |
68 | Malaysia | 5.074 % | |
69 | Cabo Verde | 4.995 % | |
70 | North Macedonia | 4.84 % | |
71 | Estonia | 4.802 % | |
72 | China, Macao SAR | 4.761 % | |
73 | Zambia | 4.725 % | |
74 | Timor-Leste | 4.706 % | |
75 | Australia | 4.674 % | |
76 | Jordan | 4.553 % | |
77 | Peru | 4.473 % | |
78 | Republic of Moldova | 4.431 % | |
79 | Colombia | 4.373 % | |
80 | Lithuania | 4.355 % | |
81 | Vietnam | 4.305 % | |
82 | Palau | 4.266 % | |
83 | Ukraine | 4.256 % | |
84 | Portugal | 4.236 % | |
85 | Myanmar | 4.201 % | |
86 | Denmark | 3.938 % | |
87 | Brazil | 3.915 % | |
88 | Dominican Republic | 3.792 % | |
89 | Brunei Darussalam | 3.731 % | |
90 | Mauritius | 3.711 % | |
91 | China | 3.651 % | |
92 | Bulgaria | 3.647 % | |
93 | Mali | 3.604 % | |
94 | Bolivia | 3.584 % | |
95 | Poland | 3.571 % | |
96 | Tanzania | 3.547 % | |
97 | Somalia | 3.51 % | |
98 | Laos | 3.437 % | |
99 | Suriname | 3.285 % | |
100 | Israel | 3.232 % | |
101 | Uganda | 3.209 % | |
102 | Sudan | 3.152 % | |
103 | Kenya | 3.095 % | |
104 | Switzerland | 2.855 % | |
105 | Russia | 2.692 % | |
106 | Bahrain | 2.61 % | |
107 | Gambia | 2.559 % | |
108 | Germany | 2.551 % | |
109 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2.53 % | |
110 | Zimbabwe | 2.44 % | |
111 | Curaçao | 2.406 % | |
112 | Uzbekistan | 2.396 % | |
113 | Lesotho | 2.372 % | |
114 | Indonesia | 2.303 % | |
115 | Morocco | 2.29 % | |
116 | Comoros | 2.26 % | |
117 | Tajikistan | 2.237 % | |
118 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.163 % | |
119 | French Polynesia | 2.157 % | |
120 | Canada | 2.138 % | |
121 | State of Palestine | 2.135 % | |
122 | Nigeria | 2.133 % | |
123 | Cameroon | 2.133 % | |
124 | Kuwait | 2.116 % | |
125 | Oman | 2.102 % | |
126 | Eswatini | 2.09 % | |
127 | Argentina | 2.045 % | |
128 | Samoa | 2.042 % | |
129 | Norway | 2.008 % | |
130 | India | 2.002 % | |
131 | Croatia | 1.986 % | |
132 | Ethiopia | 1.967 % | |
133 | Paraguay | 1.959 % | |
134 | Mexico | 1.944 % | |
135 | Botswana | 1.94 % | |
136 | United Arab Emirates | 1.939 % | |
137 | Turkey | 1.917 % | |
138 | Congo | 1.908 % | |
139 | Senegal | 1.901 % | |
140 | Eritrea | 1.889 % | |
141 | Guatemala | 1.87 % | |
142 | Venezuela | 1.85 % | |
143 | Tonga | 1.845 % | |
144 | Czech Republic | 1.81 % | |
145 | Spain | 1.739 % | |
146 | Slovenia | 1.711 % | |
147 | Chad | 1.69 % | |
148 | United States | 1.689 % | |
149 | Rwanda | 1.648 % | |
150 | Bhutan | 1.575 % | |
151 | France | 1.54 % | |
152 | Central African Republic | 1.514 % | |
153 | Benin | 1.508 % | |
154 | Italy | 1.494 % | |
155 | Sri Lanka | 1.411 % | |
156 | Romania | 1.23 % | |
157 | Sweden | 1.223 % | |
158 | Jamaica | 1.196 % | |
159 | Burkina Faso | 1.191 % | |
160 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1.191 % | |
161 | Algeria | 1.178 % | |
162 | Iraq | 1.121 % | |
163 | United Kingdom | 1.01 % | |
164 | Bangladesh | 0.983 % | |
165 | Haiti | 0.915 % | |
166 | South Africa | 0.903 % | |
167 | Tunisia | 0.899 % | |
168 | Philippines | 0.857 % | |
169 | Côte d'Ivoire | 0.823 % | |
170 | New Zealand | 0.818 % | |
171 | Ecuador | 0.818 % | |
172 | South Korea | 0.748 % | |
173 | Saudi Arabia | 0.688 % | |
174 | Iran | 0.68 % | |
175 | Thailand | 0.667 % | |
176 | El Salvador | 0.604 % | |
177 | Pakistan | 0.575 % | |
178 | Qatar | 0.559 % | |
179 | Nepal | 0.436 % | |
180 | Greece | 0.386 % | |
181 | Afghanistan | 0.293 % | |
182 | Papua New Guinea | 0.202 % | |
183 | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.161 % | |
184 | Burundi | 0.15 % | |
185 | Japan | -0.014 % | |
186 | Kiribati | -0.178 % | |
187 | Egypt | -0.205 % | |
188 | Tuvalu | -0.3 % | |
189 | Yemen | -1.582 % | |
190 | Finland | -2.184 % | |
191 | Angola | -2.408 % | |
192 | Marshall Islands | -2.543 % | |
193 | Bermuda | -4.085 % | |
194 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | -5.179 % |
- #1
Cayman Islands
- #2
Liechtenstein
- #3
Cyprus
- #4
Liberia
- #5
Malta
- #6
Mongolia
- #7
Netherlands
- #8
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #9
Belgium
- #10
Mozambique
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #194
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
- #193
Bermuda
- #192
Marshall Islands
- #191
Angola
- #190
Finland
- #189
Yemen
- #188
Tuvalu
- #187
Egypt
- #186
Kiribati
- #185
Japan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2011, the Cayman Islands led the world in Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with an astounding rate of 743.70%. The global range for this metric in 2011 spanned from a minimum of -5.18% to this maximum value. The average FDI inflow across 194 countries was 12.85%, providing a significant benchmark against which these outliers can be evaluated.
Understanding the Leaders in FDI Inflows
The dominance of the Cayman Islands and Liechtenstein in the rankings, with FDI inflows of 743.70% and 460.21% respectively, can largely be attributed to their status as financial hubs. These jurisdictions attract substantial foreign investments due to favorable tax regimes and robust financial services sectors. Cyprus follows with 151.74%, likely benefiting from its strategic location and regulatory environment that appeals to international investors.
In contrast, countries like Mozambique and Mongolia, with FDI inflows of 25.06% and 43.91% respectively, showcase a different narrative. These nations have been focal points for resource-driven investments, with mining and energy sectors drawing significant foreign capital.
Negative FDI Inflows: A Closer Look
At the lower end of the spectrum, Sint Maarten (Dutch part) recorded the lowest FDI inflow at -5.18%. Negative FDI inflows indicate a net capital outflow, which can occur due to economic contractions, political instability, or capital repatriation. Bermuda and Marshall Islands, with figures of -4.08% and -2.54% respectively, often experience such trends due to shifts in foreign investors' strategies or economic policies that deter investment.
In developed economies like Japan and Finland, which recorded -0.01% and -2.18% respectively, negative FDI could reflect mature markets where domestic investments outweigh foreign capital inflows, or policy-driven capital movements.
Year-over-Year Trends and Movements
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals significant shifts in some countries' FDI inflows. The Cayman Islands experienced the most considerable increase of 239.33%, reflecting a substantial boost in its financial services sector. The Netherlands also saw a dramatic rise of 32.56%, possibly due to its strategic role in global trade and investment networks.
Conversely, Liechtenstein experienced the largest decrease of -127.63%, which may be due to regulatory changes or shifts in international financial flows. Other notable declines include Luxembourg and Malta, with reductions of -55.27% and -21.88% respectively, possibly reflecting broader European economic dynamics during the period.
Implications of FDI Patterns
The patterns observed in 2011 FDI inflows underscore the importance of strategic economic policies and international positioning. Countries with high FDI inflows often leverage advantageous tax regimes, strategic locations, or abundant natural resources to attract foreign investments. Conversely, negative FDI inflows highlight the challenges some nations face in retaining foreign capital amid global economic shifts.
Understanding these dynamics provides valuable insights into the economic health and attractiveness of countries to foreign investors, informing policy decisions and investment strategies in the global market.
Frequently Asked Questions About Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2011
Which country had the highest FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2011?
The Cayman Islands had the highest FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2011, with 744%.
Which country had the lowest FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2011?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) had the lowest FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2011, with -5.18%.
What was the average FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP across all countries in 2011?
The average FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP across all countries in 2011 was 12.85%.
What was the median FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2011?
The median FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2011 was 3.47%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2011?
The top 3 countries for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2011 were the Cayman Islands (744%), Liechtenstein (460%), and Cyprus (152%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2011?
The dataset for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2011 included 194 countries.
Insights by country
Japan
In 2011, Japan ranked #185 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of -0.013547695 %. This figure is notably low compared to other advanced economies, reflecting a broader trend of declining foreign investment in the country. Contributing factors include Japan's aging population, which poses challenges for economic growth, as well as regulatory barriers that may deter foreign investors.
Pakistan
In 2011, Pakistan ranked #177 globally with a Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) of 0.5750551 %. This figure is significantly lower than many of its regional neighbors, indicating challenges in attracting foreign investment. Key drivers behind this low inflow include political instability, security concerns, and inadequate infrastructure, which deter potential investors and limit economic growth opportunities.
India
In 2011, India ranked #130 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 2.0020635 %. This figure is significantly lower than the top-ranked country, Luxembourg, which has consistently attracted higher foreign investment relative to its GDP. Key drivers for India's FDI inflows include its large consumer market, ongoing economic reforms, and a growing technology sector that attracts international investors.
Ecuador
Ecuador ranked #171 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2011, with a value of 0.8179665 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in attracting foreign investment compared to regional peers like Colombia and Peru. Key drivers for Ecuador's low FDI inflows include political instability, regulatory hurdles, and a reliance on oil exports, which can deter broader investment in diverse sectors.
Serbia
In 2011, Serbia achieved a global rank of #32 with a Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) of 9.620344 %. This figure was notably higher than the regional average for Southeast Europe, indicating a strong appeal for foreign investment compared to its neighbors. Key drivers of this inflow included Serbia's strategic location as a gateway to Europe, favorable trade agreements, and ongoing economic reforms aimed at attracting foreign capital.
Cyprus
In 2011, Cyprus achieved a remarkable global rank of #3 for Top FDI Inflows at 151.73691 % of GDP. This figure significantly surpassed the European average, reflecting the island's strategic location and favorable tax regime. Key drivers include its status as a hub for international business and investment, bolstered by a robust legal framework and membership in the European Union.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria ranked #92 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2011, with a value of 3.6471138 %. This figure is relatively low compared to regional neighbors, reflecting a challenging investment climate in Eastern Europe at the time. Key drivers of this statistic include Bulgaria's strategic location as a gateway to both European and Middle Eastern markets, as well as its membership in the European Union, which aimed to attract foreign investment through regulatory alignment.
Estonia
In 2011, Estonia ranked #71 globally with a Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) of 4.8024044 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating a modest level of foreign investment relative to its economic size. Key drivers of this statistic include Estonia's favorable business environment, characterized by a digital economy and transparent regulations, which attract foreign investors despite its small market size.
Slovenia
In 2011, Slovenia ranked #146 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 1.7108597 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in attracting foreign direct investment compared to more competitive economies. Factors such as Slovenia's relatively small market size, economic structure, and regulatory environment have influenced its FDI performance, limiting its appeal to international investors.
Mauritius
In 2011, Mauritius ranked #90 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 3.7107506 %. This figure is relatively modest compared to regional leaders, indicating a competitive but not dominant position in attracting foreign investment. Factors contributing to this level include Mauritius's strategic location in the Indian Ocean, a stable political environment, and a growing reputation as a financial services hub.
Data Source
Foreign direct investment, net inflows as share of GDP | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is an online platform that provides comprehensive statistical data and research on global development topics. The dataset on foreign direct investment, net inflows as a share of GDP offers country-level statistics that illustrate the proportion of foreign investment relative to a nation's economic output.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data