Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) 2008
Top FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP highlight countries attracting significant foreign investments relative to their economy size.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cayman Islands | 426.427 % | |
2 | Liechtenstein | 319.097 % | |
3 | Malta | 161.765 % | |
4 | Hungary | 47.236 % | |
5 | Cyprus | 44.365 % | |
6 | Sao Tome and Principe | 42.093 % | |
7 | Belgium | 36.803 % | |
8 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 30.571 % | |
9 | Djibouti | 22.786 % | |
10 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 21.451 % | |
11 | Montenegro | 21.39 % | |
12 | Netherlands | 20.412 % | |
13 | Fiji | 19.279 % | |
14 | New Caledonia | 19.259 % | |
15 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 19.257 % | |
16 | China, Macao SAR | 18.94 % | |
17 | Bulgaria | 18.899 % | |
18 | Seychelles | 18.357 % | |
19 | Grenada | 17.486 % | |
20 | Congo | 16.721 % | |
21 | Liberia | 16.427 % | |
22 | Mongolia | 15.022 % | |
23 | Lebanon | 14.881 % | |
24 | Saint Lucia | 13.606 % | |
25 | Barbados | 12.841 % | |
26 | Kazakhstan | 12.604 % | |
27 | Georgia | 12.522 % | |
28 | Luxembourg | 12.095 % | |
29 | Republic of Moldova | 12.001 % | |
30 | Dominica | 11.711 % | |
31 | Jordan | 11.02 % | |
32 | Cabo Verde | 10.762 % | |
33 | Madagascar | 10.578 % | |
34 | Chile | 10.457 % | |
35 | Trinidad and Tobago | 10.049 % | |
36 | Jamaica | 10.041 % | |
37 | Antigua and Barbuda | 9.859 % | |
38 | Belize | 9.76 % | |
39 | Solomon Islands | 9.684 % | |
40 | Vietnam | 9.663 % | |
41 | Ghana | 9.466 % | |
42 | Tajikistan | 9.428 % | |
43 | Albania | 9.407 % | |
44 | Panama | 9.292 % | |
45 | Namibia | 8.718 % | |
46 | Honduras | 8.65 % | |
47 | United Kingdom | 8.606 % | |
48 | Ireland | 8.454 % | |
49 | Bahamas | 8.172 % | |
50 | Azerbaijan | 8.161 % | |
51 | Estonia | 8.123 % | |
52 | Armenia | 8.092 % | |
53 | Sweden | 8.052 % | |
54 | Maldives | 7.979 % | |
55 | Costa Rica | 7.909 % | |
56 | Croatia | 7.667 % | |
57 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 7.599 % | |
58 | Serbia | 7.48 % | |
59 | Nicaragua | 7.383 % | |
60 | Kyrgyzstan | 7.335 % | |
61 | Samoa | 7.157 % | |
62 | Singapore | 7.023 % | |
63 | Bahrain | 6.978 % | |
64 | Uruguay | 6.883 % | |
65 | Finland | 6.793 % | |
66 | Cambodia | 6.696 % | |
67 | Turkmenistan | 6.626 % | |
68 | Iceland | 6.596 % | |
69 | Mauritania | 6.584 % | |
70 | Vanuatu | 6.381 % | |
71 | Romania | 6.377 % | |
72 | Tonga | 6.247 % | |
73 | North Macedonia | 6.173 % | |
74 | Timor-Leste | 6.121 % | |
75 | Guyana | 5.884 % | |
76 | Central African Republic | 5.875 % | |
77 | Egypt | 5.831 % | |
78 | Tunisia | 5.797 % | |
79 | Yemen | 5.777 % | |
80 | Peru | 5.743 % | |
81 | Ukraine | 5.688 % | |
82 | Dominican Republic | 5.673 % | |
83 | Guinea | 5.483 % | |
84 | Tuvalu | 5.341 % | |
85 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 5.257 % | |
86 | Zambia | 5.241 % | |
87 | Uganda | 5.047 % | |
88 | El Salvador | 5.021 % | |
89 | Mozambique | 4.964 % | |
90 | Tanzania | 4.949 % | |
91 | Botswana | 4.854 % | |
92 | Slovakia | 4.8 % | |
93 | Libya | 4.741 % | |
94 | Israel | 4.65 % | |
95 | Gambia | 4.533 % | |
96 | Canada | 4.515 % | |
97 | Russia | 4.503 % | |
98 | Gabon | 4.454 % | |
99 | Spain | 4.361 % | |
100 | Norway | 4.359 % | |
101 | Colombia | 4.356 % | |
102 | Australia | 4.268 % | |
103 | Oman | 4.229 % | |
104 | Latvia | 4.202 % | |
105 | Laos | 4.182 % | |
106 | Marshall Islands | 3.885 % | |
107 | Niger | 3.879 % | |
108 | Mauritius | 3.73 % | |
109 | Czech Republic | 3.727 % | |
110 | China | 3.675 % | |
111 | India | 3.621 % | |
112 | Lithuania | 3.611 % | |
113 | Belarus | 3.601 % | |
114 | Chad | 3.482 % | |
115 | Malaysia | 3.281 % | |
116 | Qatar | 3.278 % | |
117 | Eswatini | 3.267 % | |
118 | South Africa | 3.127 % | |
119 | Bolivia | 3.073 % | |
120 | Brazil | 2.991 % | |
121 | Portugal | 2.969 % | |
122 | Thailand | 2.938 % | |
123 | Eritrea | 2.826 % | |
124 | Syrian Arab Republic | 2.789 % | |
125 | Poland | 2.721 % | |
126 | Myanmar | 2.711 % | |
127 | Senegal | 2.704 % | |
128 | Argentina | 2.69 % | |
129 | Pakistan | 2.689 % | |
130 | Mexico | 2.563 % | |
131 | Turkey | 2.56 % | |
132 | Sudan | 2.55 % | |
133 | Malawi | 2.524 % | |
134 | Bermuda | 2.457 % | |
135 | Morocco | 2.422 % | |
136 | Nigeria | 2.414 % | |
137 | Palau | 2.382 % | |
138 | Mali | 2.334 % | |
139 | France | 2.323 % | |
140 | United States | 2.309 % | |
141 | Rwanda | 1.998 % | |
142 | Slovenia | 1.947 % | |
143 | New Zealand | 1.942 % | |
144 | Guatemala | 1.9 % | |
145 | Uzbekistan | 1.854 % | |
146 | Sri Lanka | 1.848 % | |
147 | Paraguay | 1.835 % | |
148 | Indonesia | 1.826 % | |
149 | Ecuador | 1.729 % | |
150 | Angola | 1.7 % | |
151 | Greece | 1.633 % | |
152 | United Arab Emirates | 1.605 % | |
153 | Somalia | 1.471 % | |
154 | Austria | 1.468 % | |
155 | Algeria | 1.463 % | |
156 | Bangladesh | 1.45 % | |
157 | Iraq | 1.41 % | |
158 | Brunei Darussalam | 1.395 % | |
159 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 1.374 % | |
160 | Sierra Leone | 1.277 % | |
161 | Zimbabwe | 1.168 % | |
162 | Togo | 1.111 % | |
163 | Saudi Arabia | 1.059 % | |
164 | South Korea | 1.025 % | |
165 | Germany | 0.813 % | |
166 | Philippines | 0.738 % | |
167 | State of Palestine | 0.705 % | |
168 | Guinea-Bissau | 0.696 % | |
169 | Aruba | 0.664 % | |
170 | Venezuela | 0.659 % | |
171 | Lesotho | 0.623 % | |
172 | Denmark | 0.617 % | |
173 | Switzerland | 0.52 % | |
174 | Comoros | 0.508 % | |
175 | Benin | 0.493 % | |
176 | Iran | 0.488 % | |
177 | Japan | 0.477 % | |
178 | Afghanistan | 0.455 % | |
179 | Papua New Guinea | 0.41 % | |
180 | Ethiopia | 0.401 % | |
181 | Burkina Faso | 0.351 % | |
182 | Haiti | 0.286 % | |
183 | Kenya | 0.266 % | |
184 | Bhutan | 0.239 % | |
185 | Burundi | 0.238 % | |
186 | French Polynesia | 0.195 % | |
187 | Cameroon | 0.076 % | |
188 | Nepal | 0.008 % | |
189 | Kuwait | -0.004 % | |
190 | Italy | -0.393 % | |
191 | Kiribati | -0.862 % | |
192 | Equatorial Guinea | -4.02 % | |
193 | Suriname | -6.55 % |
- #1
Cayman Islands
- #2
Liechtenstein
- #3
Malta
- #4
Hungary
- #5
Cyprus
- #6
Sao Tome and Principe
- #7
Belgium
- #8
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #9
Djibouti
- #10
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #193
Suriname
- #192
Equatorial Guinea
- #191
Kiribati
- #190
Italy
- #189
Kuwait
- #188
Nepal
- #187
Cameroon
- #186
French Polynesia
- #185
Burundi
- #184
Bhutan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2008, the Cayman Islands led the world in Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a staggering 426.43%, highlighting its significant attraction of foreign investments relative to its economy size. The global range for this metric varied dramatically from -6.55% to 426.43%. The average FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP across 193 countries was 11.05%, while the median stood at 4.50%, indicating a broad distribution with some extreme values.
Factors Driving High FDI Inflows in Specific Regions
The Cayman Islands, Liechtenstein (319.10%), and Malta (161.77%) topped the list due to their strategic roles as financial hubs and favorable tax regimes. These countries have established themselves as attractive destinations for foreign capital by offering low corporate taxes and minimal regulatory barriers. Such policies are particularly appealing to multinational corporations seeking efficient ways to manage their global tax liabilities.
In Hungary (47.24%) and Cyprus (44.36%), EU membership and strategic geographic positions have facilitated the inflow of investments. Hungary benefits from a skilled workforce and integration into European supply chains, while Cyprus leverages its location as a gateway between Europe and the Middle East.
Challenges Faced by Countries with Negative FDI Inflows
Conversely, countries like Suriname (-6.55%) and Equatorial Guinea (-4.02%) experienced negative FDI inflows, reflecting economic instability and potential divestment. These negative values suggest an outflow of capital, possibly due to political instability, poor governance, or unattractive investment climates.
The presence of negative inflows in Italy (-0.39%) and Kuwait (-0.004%) highlights challenges even in more developed economies, which may face structural issues, bureaucratic hurdles, or investor concerns over economic policy directions.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes in FDI Inflows
Analyzing year-over-year changes, Luxembourg saw a remarkable increase of 69.63%, although from a previously negative base, indicating a reversal of capital outflows, possibly due to improved investor confidence or policy reforms. Cyprus also experienced a substantial increase of 34.79%, reflecting its growing role as a financial hub.
On the other hand, Liechtenstein had the largest decrease at -409.77%, suggesting a significant withdrawal of foreign capital, possibly linked to global financial instability or changes in international regulatory environments affecting its financial services sector. Malta and the Cayman Islands also saw notable declines, which could be attributed to shifts in global financial flows during the economic downturn of the late 2000s.
Implications of Extreme FDI Inflows
Countries like the Cayman Islands and Liechtenstein with exceptionally high FDI inflows relative to GDP highlight the significant role of financial services in these small economies. While such inflows can boost economic activity, they also pose risks of over-reliance on volatile financial markets. The extreme values observed in these jurisdictions underscore the importance of diversifying economic activities to ensure long-term stability.
For nations with negative or low inflows, addressing structural barriers and enhancing the investment climate can be crucial steps toward attracting sustainable foreign investment. This includes improving governance, infrastructure, and legal frameworks to make these countries more appealing to global investors.
Frequently Asked Questions About Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2008
Which country had the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2008?
The Cayman Islands had the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2008, with 426%.
What was the average FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP for all countries in 2008?
The average FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP for all countries in 2008 was 11.05%.
Which country had the lowest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2008?
Suriname had the lowest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2008, with -6.55%.
What was the median FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP among countries in 2008?
The median FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP among countries in 2008 was 4.5%.
Can you list the top 3 countries with the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2008?
The top 3 countries with the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2008 were the Cayman Islands (426%), Liechtenstein (319%), and Malta (162%).
How many countries had negative FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2008?
In 2008, four countries had negative FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP: Suriname, Equatorial Guinea, Kiribati, and Italy.
Insights by country
Netherlands
In 2008, the Netherlands achieved a global rank of #12 for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 20.412338 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's strategic position as a gateway to Europe. The Netherlands' favorable business climate, characterized by a highly skilled workforce and robust infrastructure, along with its tax incentives for foreign investors, significantly contribute to attracting substantial foreign direct investment.
Ethiopia
Ethiopia ranked #180 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2008, with a value of 0.40099713 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in attracting foreign investment compared to higher-ranked countries. Key drivers behind this low inflow include political instability, infrastructure deficits, and a complex regulatory environment that can deter potential investors.
Kuwait
Kuwait ranked #189 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2008, with a value of -0.0040383795 %. This figure is significantly lower than many regional peers, reflecting a challenging investment climate in comparison to countries with more favorable economic policies. Factors contributing to this negative inflow include stringent regulations and a lack of diversification in its economy, which heavily relies on oil revenues.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
In 2008, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines achieved a remarkable rank of #10 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 21.450974 %. This figure significantly surpasses the average for Caribbean nations, reflecting the country's attractiveness to foreign investors. Contributing factors include its strategic location, favorable tax policies, and a growing tourism sector, which collectively enhance its economic appeal.
Ecuador
Ecuador ranked #149 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2008, with a value of 1.7294958 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in attracting foreign investment compared to more stable economies. Key factors contributing to this low inflow include political instability, fluctuating oil prices, and a regulatory environment perceived as less favorable to foreign investors.
Mali
Mali ranked #138 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2008, with a value of 2.3337963 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in attracting foreign investment compared to more favorable economies. Key drivers for this low inflow include Mali's political instability and underdeveloped infrastructure, which deter potential investors looking for stable and accessible markets.
South Korea
In 2008, South Korea ranked #164 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 1.0248898 %. This figure is notably lower than many of its regional peers, indicating a cautious approach to foreign investment during that period. Key drivers for this modest inflow included South Korea's focus on nurturing domestic industries and a complex regulatory environment that may have deterred foreign investors.
Jamaica
In 2008, Jamaica ranked #36 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) at 10.041304 %. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Jamaica's strategic location and appeal to foreign investors, particularly in tourism and bauxite mining. The country's investment climate was bolstered by government initiatives aimed at enhancing infrastructure and promoting economic growth, drawing significant capital inflows during this period.
Eritrea
Eritrea ranked #123 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2008, with a value of 2.8257003 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating limited foreign investment relative to its economic size. Contributing factors include Eritrea's challenging business environment, characterized by restrictive government policies and ongoing regional tensions, which deter potential investors.
Hungary
In 2008, Hungary achieved a remarkable global rank of #4 for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) at 47.23642 %. This figure significantly surpassed the average for Central and Eastern Europe, reflecting Hungary's strategic position as a gateway to European markets. Key drivers of this high inflow included its favorable investment climate, competitive labor costs, and strong manufacturing sector, particularly in automotive and electronics industries.
Data Source
Foreign direct investment, net inflows as share of GDP | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is an online platform that provides comprehensive statistical data and research on global development topics. The dataset on foreign direct investment, net inflows as a share of GDP offers country-level statistics that illustrate the proportion of foreign investment relative to a nation's economic output.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data