Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) 2009
Top FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP highlight countries attracting significant foreign investments relative to their economy size.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liechtenstein | 664.574 % | |
2 | Cayman Islands | 474.063 % | |
3 | Cyprus | 252.668 % | |
4 | Luxembourg | 50.039 % | |
5 | Montenegro | 37.275 % | |
6 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 25.357 % | |
7 | Netherlands | 23.119 % | |
8 | Ireland | 22.828 % | |
9 | Turkmenistan | 22.524 % | |
10 | Seychelles | 19.773 % | |
11 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 17.264 % | |
12 | Malta | 16.475 % | |
13 | Belgium | 15.949 % | |
14 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 15.301 % | |
15 | Grenada | 14.094 % | |
16 | Mongolia | 13.604 % | |
17 | New Caledonia | 13.583 % | |
18 | Lebanon | 13.57 % | |
19 | Madagascar | 13.449 % | |
20 | Kazakhstan | 12.381 % | |
21 | Congo | 12.229 % | |
22 | Singapore | 12.071 % | |
23 | Dominica | 11.01 % | |
24 | Albania | 10.907 % | |
25 | Equatorial Guinea | 10.888 % | |
26 | Fiji | 10.742 % | |
27 | Marshall Islands | 9.689 % | |
28 | Saint Lucia | 9.631 % | |
29 | Estonia | 9.505 % | |
30 | Namibia | 9.275 % | |
31 | Djibouti | 9.233 % | |
32 | Ghana | 9.108 % | |
33 | Armenia | 8.789 % | |
34 | Jordan | 8.787 % | |
35 | Niger | 8.621 % | |
36 | Switzerland | 8.455 % | |
37 | Qatar | 8.308 % | |
38 | Barbados | 7.97 % | |
39 | Sao Tome and Principe | 7.724 % | |
40 | Mozambique | 7.584 % | |
41 | Bulgaria | 7.49 % | |
42 | Cambodia | 7.425 % | |
43 | Chile | 7.423 % | |
44 | Liberia | 7.229 % | |
45 | Vietnam | 7.169 % | |
46 | Cabo Verde | 6.802 % | |
47 | Maldives | 6.735 % | |
48 | Bahamas | 6.652 % | |
49 | Timor-Leste | 6.597 % | |
50 | Azerbaijan | 6.547 % | |
51 | Belize | 6.448 % | |
52 | Tuvalu | 6.287 % | |
53 | Serbia | 6.238 % | |
54 | Georgia | 6.137 % | |
55 | Antigua and Barbuda | 6.057 % | |
56 | Solomon Islands | 6.031 % | |
57 | Laos | 5.459 % | |
58 | Vanuatu | 5.423 % | |
59 | Mali | 5.341 % | |
60 | Peru | 5.322 % | |
61 | Costa Rica | 5.252 % | |
62 | Gabon | 5.248 % | |
63 | Lesotho | 5.247 % | |
64 | Nicaragua | 5.229 % | |
65 | Guyana | 5.181 % | |
66 | Croatia | 4.926 % | |
67 | Eritrea | 4.901 % | |
68 | Uruguay | 4.9 % | |
69 | Republic of Moldova | 4.853 % | |
70 | Syrian Arab Republic | 4.749 % | |
71 | Zambia | 4.533 % | |
72 | Kyrgyzstan | 4.038 % | |
73 | Jamaica | 4.003 % | |
74 | Ukraine | 3.923 % | |
75 | Panama | 3.906 % | |
76 | State of Palestine | 3.716 % | |
77 | Trinidad and Tobago | 3.699 % | |
78 | Belarus | 3.689 % | |
79 | Somalia | 3.663 % | |
80 | Papua New Guinea | 3.615 % | |
81 | Austria | 3.581 % | |
82 | Kiribati | 3.564 % | |
83 | Egypt | 3.548 % | |
84 | Dominican Republic | 3.515 % | |
85 | Tunisia | 3.51 % | |
86 | Colombia | 3.456 % | |
87 | Honduras | 3.39 % | |
88 | Uganda | 3.349 % | |
89 | Sudan | 3.344 % | |
90 | Tanzania | 3.24 % | |
91 | Poland | 3.181 % | |
92 | Australia | 3.105 % | |
93 | Chad | 3.044 % | |
94 | Tajikistan | 2.994 % | |
95 | Russia | 2.992 % | |
96 | Myanmar | 2.924 % | |
97 | Nigeria | 2.9 % | |
98 | Sierra Leone | 2.793 % | |
99 | Mauritius | 2.771 % | |
100 | North Macedonia | 2.76 % | |
101 | Brunei Darussalam | 2.733 % | |
102 | Oman | 2.722 % | |
103 | Gambia | 2.72 % | |
104 | Angola | 2.699 % | |
105 | Cameroon | 2.672 % | |
106 | Romania | 2.664 % | |
107 | India | 2.652 % | |
108 | Czech Republic | 2.547 % | |
109 | China | 2.525 % | |
110 | Bolivia | 2.44 % | |
111 | Portugal | 2.351 % | |
112 | South Africa | 2.312 % | |
113 | Thailand | 2.276 % | |
114 | Libya | 2.255 % | |
115 | Norway | 2.183 % | |
116 | Israel | 2.162 % | |
117 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.122 % | |
118 | Rwanda | 2.118 % | |
119 | El Salvador | 2.095 % | |
120 | Mexico | 2.083 % | |
121 | Sweden | 2.063 % | |
122 | Botswana | 2.063 % | |
123 | Senegal | 2.053 % | |
124 | Central African Republic | 2.045 % | |
125 | Morocco | 1.948 % | |
126 | Brazil | 1.888 % | |
127 | Eswatini | 1.864 % | |
128 | Algeria | 1.827 % | |
129 | Uzbekistan | 1.82 % | |
130 | Slovakia | 1.703 % | |
131 | Germany | 1.63 % | |
132 | Samoa | 1.571 % | |
133 | Comoros | 1.529 % | |
134 | Canada | 1.524 % | |
135 | Palau | 1.516 % | |
136 | Iraq | 1.431 % | |
137 | Bhutan | 1.375 % | |
138 | Guinea | 1.355 % | |
139 | Guatemala | 1.346 % | |
140 | Turkey | 1.313 % | |
141 | Pakistan | 1.248 % | |
142 | Argentina | 1.206 % | |
143 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 1.173 % | |
144 | Philippines | 1.173 % | |
145 | Denmark | 1.171 % | |
146 | Bahrain | 1.121 % | |
147 | United States | 1.113 % | |
148 | Zimbabwe | 1.086 % | |
149 | Kuwait | 1.051 % | |
150 | Togo | 0.981 % | |
151 | Sri Lanka | 0.96 % | |
152 | South Korea | 0.918 % | |
153 | Indonesia | 0.904 % | |
154 | Bangladesh | 0.88 % | |
155 | Paraguay | 0.861 % | |
156 | Greece | 0.846 % | |
157 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.786 % | |
158 | Italy | 0.752 % | |
159 | Iran | 0.721 % | |
160 | Ethiopia | 0.683 % | |
161 | France | 0.682 % | |
162 | Burkina Faso | 0.599 % | |
163 | United Kingdom | 0.599 % | |
164 | Malawi | 0.545 % | |
165 | Yemen | 0.514 % | |
166 | Ecuador | 0.514 % | |
167 | Spain | 0.505 % | |
168 | Iceland | 0.481 % | |
169 | Haiti | 0.478 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 0.452 % | |
171 | United Arab Emirates | 0.447 % | |
172 | French Polynesia | 0.332 % | |
173 | Nepal | 0.298 % | |
174 | Kenya | 0.275 % | |
175 | Japan | 0.229 % | |
176 | Saudi Arabia | 0.102 % | |
177 | Tonga | 0.079 % | |
178 | Malaysia | 0.057 % | |
179 | Burundi | 0.02 % | |
180 | New Zealand | -0.043 % | |
181 | Mauritania | -0.065 % | |
182 | Benin | -0.193 % | |
183 | Venezuela | -0.345 % | |
184 | Aruba | -0.416 % | |
185 | Latvia | -0.584 % | |
186 | Slovenia | -0.694 % | |
187 | Lithuania | -0.961 % | |
188 | Bermuda | -1.063 % | |
189 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | -1.307 % | |
190 | China, Macao SAR | -1.911 % | |
191 | Hungary | -2.283 % | |
192 | Suriname | -2.41 % | |
193 | Finland | -3.482 % |
- #1
Liechtenstein
- #2
Cayman Islands
- #3
Cyprus
- #4
Luxembourg
- #5
Montenegro
- #6
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #7
Netherlands
- #8
Ireland
- #9
Turkmenistan
- #10
Seychelles
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #193
Finland
- #192
Suriname
- #191
Hungary
- #190
China, Macao SAR
- #189
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #188
Bermuda
- #187
Lithuania
- #186
Slovenia
- #185
Latvia
- #184
Aruba
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2009, Liechtenstein led the world in Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a staggering 664.57%, showcasing its remarkable ability to attract foreign investments relative to its economic size. The global range for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP spanned from a minimum of -3.48% to the maximum recorded by Liechtenstein. The median value across the globe was 2.90%, providing a central benchmark for comparison among the 193 countries with available data.
The Outliers: Liechtenstein and Other Top Performers
Liechtenstein's exceptional FDI inflow percentage is a significant outlier, influenced by its unique economic structure and favorable tax policies that attract multinational corporations. The Cayman Islands followed with 474.06%, demonstrating its status as a major offshore financial center. Cyprus also stood out with 252.67%, benefiting from its strategic location and favorable business environment. These countries illustrate how specialized economic policies and financial services can dramatically impact FDI inflows relative to GDP.
Other notable performers include Luxembourg with 50.04% and Montenegro with 37.27%. Both countries leverage their strategic positions in Europe and attractive investment climates to draw substantial foreign investment. China, Hong Kong SAR at 25.36% further underscores the importance of financial services and international trade hubs in boosting FDI inflows.
Negative FDI Inflows: Understanding the Context
At the other end of the spectrum, countries like Finland and Suriname experienced negative FDI inflows, with percentages of -3.48% and -2.41%, respectively. These figures indicate a net outflow of investment, possibly due to economic instability or policies that discourage foreign investment. Hungary and China, Macao SAR also reported negative inflows, highlighting the challenges they faced during the global financial crisis, which may have led to capital flight or reduced investment confidence.
Understanding these negative figures requires considering broader economic conditions, such as recession impacts, political instability, or structural economic weaknesses that deter foreign investors.
Year-over-Year Trends: Significant Movers
The year-over-year analysis reveals substantial shifts in FDI inflows for certain countries. Liechtenstein saw the most significant increase of 345.48%, a jump of 108.3% from the previous year, reflecting its enhanced attractiveness to foreign investors. Cyprus experienced a dramatic rise of 208.30% or 469.5%, driven by reforms and improved investor confidence.
Conversely, Malta faced a steep decline of -145.29% or -89.8%, possibly due to regulatory changes or economic downturns impacting investor sentiment. Similarly, Hungary and Belgium experienced notable decreases, with Hungary's FDI inflow dropping by -49.52% or -104.8%, underscoring the volatility and sensitivity of FDI to economic policy and global market conditions.
Strategic Implications and Global Insights
The data on Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2009 highlights the strategic importance of economic policies, regulatory environments, and geopolitical stability in attracting foreign investments. Countries like Liechtenstein and the Cayman Islands exemplify how financial services and favorable tax regimes can significantly enhance FDI inflows. In contrast, nations with negative inflows or significant declines must assess and potentially reform their economic frameworks to restore investor confidence and attract foreign capital.
This analysis underscores the diverse range of factors influencing FDI inflows, from economic policies to global financial trends, and emphasizes the critical role of strategic economic planning in leveraging foreign investments for growth and development.
Frequently Asked Questions About Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2009
Which country had the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
Liechtenstein had the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2009, with 665%.
Which country had the lowest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
Finland had the lowest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2009, with -3.48%.
What was the average FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP across all countries in 2009?
The average FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP across all countries in 2009 was 11.94%.
What was the median FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
The median FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2009 was 2.9%.
How many countries are included in the dataset for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
The dataset includes 193 countries for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2009.
Which countries were in the top 3 for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
The top 3 countries for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2009 were Liechtenstein, Cayman Islands, and Cyprus.
Insights by country
Botswana
Botswana ranked #122 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2009, with a value of 2.06256 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating a modest level of foreign investment relative to its economic size. The country's stable political environment and sound economic policies have historically attracted some investment, but factors such as limited market size and infrastructure challenges may have hindered greater inflows.
Estonia
In 2009, Estonia ranked #29 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 9.505442 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Estonia's attractiveness as a destination for foreign investment. Key drivers include its strategic location within Europe, a highly skilled workforce, and a favorable business environment characterized by low corporate taxes and e-governance initiatives.
Croatia
In 2009, Croatia ranked #66 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 4.925904 %. This figure reflects a growing interest from foreign investors, particularly in the tourism and real estate sectors, which are pivotal to Croatia's economy. Additionally, Croatia's strategic location along the Adriatic Sea enhances its appeal as a gateway to Central and Eastern Europe, contributing to its foreign direct investment attractiveness.
Bangladesh
In 2009, Bangladesh ranked #154 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 0.87951714 %. This figure is relatively low compared to regional peers, indicating challenges in attracting foreign investment. Contributing factors include Bangladesh's ongoing infrastructure deficits, political instability, and a need for improved regulatory frameworks that could enhance the investment climate.
Barbados
In 2009, Barbados ranked #38 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 7.970079 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's strategic position as a financial services hub in the Caribbean. Key drivers of this inflow include favorable tax policies and a stable political environment, which attract foreign investment, particularly in tourism and real estate sectors.
Cayman Islands
The Cayman Islands ranked #2 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2009, with a remarkable 474.06348 %. This figure significantly surpasses the global average, highlighting the territory's status as a leading offshore financial center. The islands benefit from a stable political environment, favorable tax policies, and a strong regulatory framework, attracting substantial foreign investment, particularly in finance and tourism.
South Korea
In 2009, South Korea ranked #152 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 0.9177316 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges South Korea faced in attracting foreign investment during that period. Factors such as a competitive domestic market, regulatory barriers, and geopolitical tensions in the region contributed to this relatively modest inflow of foreign direct investment.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
In 2009, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines achieved a global rank of #14 with a Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) of 15.301427 %. This figure significantly exceeds the average for the Caribbean region, highlighting the countryโs attractiveness for foreign investment. Key drivers include its favorable tax regime and strategic location, which appeal to investors looking to access both regional and international markets.
Myanmar
In 2009, Myanmar ranked #96 globally with a value of 2.9235542 % for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP). This figure is relatively low compared to neighboring countries in Southeast Asia, reflecting the challenges Myanmar faced in attracting foreign investment during this period. Key drivers included the country's political instability and underdeveloped infrastructure, which deterred potential investors despite its rich natural resources.
China
In 2009, China ranked #109 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 2.52539 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, highlighting China's position as a developing economy during this period. Key drivers of this statistic include China's rapid industrial growth and its gradual integration into the global economy, which encouraged foreign investment despite existing regulatory hurdles.
Data Source
Foreign direct investment, net inflows as share of GDP | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is an online platform that provides comprehensive statistical data and research on global development topics. The dataset on foreign direct investment, net inflows as a share of GDP offers country-level statistics that illustrate the proportion of foreign investment relative to a nation's economic output.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data