Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) 2010
Top FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP highlight countries attracting significant foreign investments relative to their economy size.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liechtenstein | 587.839 % | |
2 | Cayman Islands | 504.372 % | |
3 | Cyprus | 125.273 % | |
4 | Liberia | 103.337 % | |
5 | Malta | 101.626 % | |
6 | Luxembourg | 69.606 % | |
7 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 36.175 % | |
8 | Sao Tome and Principe | 26.629 % | |
9 | Belgium | 26.06 % | |
10 | Mongolia | 23.526 % | |
11 | Singapore | 23.069 % | |
12 | Solomon Islands | 18.474 % | |
13 | Montenegro | 18.329 % | |
14 | Ireland | 17.024 % | |
15 | Equatorial Guinea | 16.758 % | |
16 | Seychelles | 16.279 % | |
17 | Turkmenistan | 16.084 % | |
18 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 15.797 % | |
19 | New Caledonia | 15.368 % | |
20 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 13.309 % | |
21 | Estonia | 13.277 % | |
22 | China, Macao SAR | 12.85 % | |
23 | Saint Lucia | 11.753 % | |
24 | Congo | 11.577 % | |
25 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 11.35 % | |
26 | Lebanon | 11.133 % | |
27 | Mozambique | 11.028 % | |
28 | Dominica | 10.989 % | |
29 | Cambodia | 10.17 % | |
30 | Niger | 10.147 % | |
31 | Kyrgyzstan | 9.861 % | |
32 | Vanuatu | 9.409 % | |
33 | Madagascar | 9.139 % | |
34 | Albania | 9.017 % | |
35 | Bahamas | 8.637 % | |
36 | Zambia | 8.533 % | |
37 | Panama | 8.432 % | |
38 | Maldives | 8.364 % | |
39 | Ghana | 7.849 % | |
40 | Barbados | 7.835 % | |
41 | Aruba | 7.612 % | |
42 | Georgia | 7.411 % | |
43 | Antigua and Barbuda | 7.219 % | |
44 | Grenada | 7.218 % | |
45 | Chile | 6.841 % | |
46 | Netherlands | 6.477 % | |
47 | Cabo Verde | 6.368 % | |
48 | Azerbaijan | 6.337 % | |
49 | Guyana | 5.768 % | |
50 | Peru | 5.731 % | |
51 | Eritrea | 5.725 % | |
52 | Armenia | 5.716 % | |
53 | Fiji | 5.671 % | |
54 | Tanzania | 5.664 % | |
55 | Nicaragua | 5.593 % | |
56 | Sierra Leone | 5.593 % | |
57 | Jordan | 5.59 % | |
58 | Belize | 5.515 % | |
59 | Vietnam | 5.435 % | |
60 | Uruguay | 5.223 % | |
61 | Costa Rica | 5.064 % | |
62 | Kazakhstan | 5.036 % | |
63 | Norway | 4.915 % | |
64 | Finland | 4.9 % | |
65 | Czech Republic | 4.815 % | |
66 | Ukraine | 4.568 % | |
67 | Bhutan | 4.405 % | |
68 | Thailand | 4.323 % | |
69 | Malaysia | 4.269 % | |
70 | Republic of Moldova | 4.259 % | |
71 | Mauritius | 4.238 % | |
72 | Somalia | 4.167 % | |
73 | Poland | 3.945 % | |
74 | China | 3.935 % | |
75 | Laos | 3.909 % | |
76 | Serbia | 3.889 % | |
77 | Honduras | 3.835 % | |
78 | Portugal | 3.774 % | |
79 | Qatar | 3.733 % | |
80 | Brazil | 3.73 % | |
81 | Gabon | 3.645 % | |
82 | Bulgaria | 3.636 % | |
83 | Rwanda | 3.572 % | |
84 | Brunei Darussalam | 3.507 % | |
85 | Sudan | 3.5 % | |
86 | Timor-Leste | 3.439 % | |
87 | Dominican Republic | 3.383 % | |
88 | Bermuda | 3.357 % | |
89 | Djibouti | 3.234 % | |
90 | North Macedonia | 3.204 % | |
91 | Bolivia | 3.165 % | |
92 | Eswatini | 3.111 % | |
93 | Australia | 3.085 % | |
94 | Lithuania | 3.01 % | |
95 | Uzbekistan | 2.994 % | |
96 | Mali | 2.926 % | |
97 | Israel | 2.918 % | |
98 | Egypt | 2.916 % | |
99 | Switzerland | 2.897 % | |
100 | Tunisia | 2.888 % | |
101 | Central African Republic | 2.871 % | |
102 | United Arab Emirates | 2.859 % | |
103 | Russia | 2.831 % | |
104 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.791 % | |
105 | Mexico | 2.762 % | |
106 | Paraguay | 2.762 % | |
107 | Guatemala | 2.71 % | |
108 | Argentina | 2.675 % | |
109 | United Kingdom | 2.673 % | |
110 | Togo | 2.635 % | |
111 | Croatia | 2.62 % | |
112 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2.584 % | |
113 | Spain | 2.519 % | |
114 | Namibia | 2.515 % | |
115 | Germany | 2.482 % | |
116 | Trinidad and Tobago | 2.479 % | |
117 | Belarus | 2.435 % | |
118 | Gambia | 2.407 % | |
119 | Syrian Arab Republic | 2.393 % | |
120 | Libya | 2.367 % | |
121 | Slovakia | 2.322 % | |
122 | Mauritania | 2.319 % | |
123 | Colombia | 2.244 % | |
124 | Chad | 2.226 % | |
125 | Uganda | 2.039 % | |
126 | Indonesia | 2.025 % | |
127 | Latvia | 2.024 % | |
128 | Cameroon | 1.95 % | |
129 | Oman | 1.912 % | |
130 | Romania | 1.89 % | |
131 | State of Palestine | 1.859 % | |
132 | Iceland | 1.846 % | |
133 | Canada | 1.837 % | |
134 | Myanmar | 1.819 % | |
135 | United States | 1.755 % | |
136 | Botswana | 1.728 % | |
137 | Senegal | 1.688 % | |
138 | Tajikistan | 1.665 % | |
139 | Nigeria | 1.642 % | |
140 | India | 1.635 % | |
141 | Haiti | 1.501 % | |
142 | France | 1.47 % | |
143 | Palau | 1.457 % | |
144 | Jamaica | 1.405 % | |
145 | Tuvalu | 1.404 % | |
146 | Algeria | 1.294 % | |
147 | Tonga | 1.27 % | |
148 | Morocco | 1.23 % | |
149 | Afghanistan | 1.203 % | |
150 | Turkey | 1.163 % | |
151 | Kuwait | 1.13 % | |
152 | Bangladesh | 1.069 % | |
153 | French Polynesia | 1.056 % | |
154 | Pakistan | 1.028 % | |
155 | Côte d'Ivoire | 1.026 % | |
156 | Zimbabwe | 1.018 % | |
157 | Iraq | 1.008 % | |
158 | Ethiopia | 0.963 % | |
159 | Malawi | 0.958 % | |
160 | Saudi Arabia | 0.924 % | |
161 | Comoros | 0.92 % | |
162 | South Africa | 0.885 % | |
163 | Sri Lanka | 0.814 % | |
164 | South Korea | 0.796 % | |
165 | Iran | 0.749 % | |
166 | Slovenia | 0.668 % | |
167 | Yemen | 0.61 % | |
168 | Bahrain | 0.581 % | |
169 | Benin | 0.561 % | |
170 | Nepal | 0.548 % | |
171 | Philippines | 0.514 % | |
172 | Italy | 0.463 % | |
173 | Lesotho | 0.425 % | |
174 | Venezuela | 0.403 % | |
175 | Kenya | 0.392 % | |
176 | Burkina Faso | 0.384 % | |
177 | Papua New Guinea | 0.25 % | |
178 | Ecuador | 0.243 % | |
179 | New Zealand | 0.195 % | |
180 | Greece | 0.18 % | |
181 | Japan | 0.128 % | |
182 | Sweden | 0.127 % | |
183 | Samoa | 0.049 % | |
184 | Burundi | 0.038 % | |
185 | El Salvador | -0.613 % | |
186 | Angola | -3.378 % | |
187 | Denmark | -3.568 % | |
188 | Kiribati | -3.99 % | |
189 | Austria | -5.645 % | |
190 | Marshall Islands | -5.808 % | |
191 | Suriname | -5.853 % | |
192 | Hungary | -15.885 % |
- #1
Liechtenstein
- #2
Cayman Islands
- #3
Cyprus
- #4
Liberia
- #5
Malta
- #6
Luxembourg
- #7
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #8
Sao Tome and Principe
- #9
Belgium
- #10
Mongolia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #192
Hungary
- #191
Suriname
- #190
Marshall Islands
- #189
Austria
- #188
Kiribati
- #187
Denmark
- #186
Angola
- #185
El Salvador
- #184
Burundi
- #183
Samoa
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2010, Liechtenstein led the world in Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with an extraordinary 587.84%, illustrating its significant capacity to attract foreign investment relative to its economy size. The global range for this metric spanned from a minimum of -15.89% to a maximum of 587.84%. To provide context, the average FDI inflow across 192 countries was 12.13%, while the median was 2.93%, indicating a broad disparity in investment levels worldwide.
Economic Hubs and High FDI Inflows
Several small but economically strategic regions dominated the top rankings for FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2010. Liechtenstein and the Cayman Islands reported inflows of 587.84% and 504.37%, respectively. These jurisdictions are known for their favorable tax regimes and financial services sectors, which attract substantial foreign investment. Similarly, Cyprus and Malta reported high inflows of 125.27% and 101.63%, reflecting their strategic locations and roles as financial centers in Europe. These countries' economic policies and regulatory environments are tailored to attract multinational corporations and financial institutions, which drive these high FDI figures.
Negative Inflows: Economic Challenges and Policy Impacts
On the opposite end of the spectrum, countries like Hungary and Suriname experienced negative FDI inflows of -15.89% and -5.85%, respectively. Negative inflows often result from disinvestment or capital flight, possibly due to political instability or economic downturns. For instance, Hungary's negative inflow could be linked to economic reforms and regulatory changes that may have deterred foreign investors. Likewise, Denmark and Austria also showed negative inflows, at -3.57% and -5.65%, suggesting similar investor apprehensions in these regions during 2010.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes
The year 2010 saw substantial shifts in FDI inflows for certain countries, highlighting dynamic economic environments and policy impacts. Liberia experienced a remarkable increase in FDI inflows by 96.11 percentage points, a 1329.5% rise, likely due to its post-conflict reconstruction efforts and natural resource investments. Malta, with an 85.15 percentage point increase (516.8%), benefited from its EU membership and strategic location, attracting more international business.
Conversely, Cyprus saw a significant decrease of 127.39 percentage points (-50.4%), which could reflect the global financial crisis's lingering effects on its economy. Liechtenstein also experienced a notable drop of 76.74 percentage points (-11.5%), though it maintained the highest overall inflow percentage. These fluctuations underscore the volatility and sensitivity of FDI to global economic conditions and domestic policy changes.
Strategic Importance and Investment Patterns
The data from 2010 underscores the strategic importance of small, economically open countries in attracting foreign investments. Jurisdictions like Luxembourg and China, Hong Kong SAR, with inflows of 69.61% and 36.17%, respectively, emphasize their roles as global financial hubs. These regions benefit from well-developed infrastructure, robust legal frameworks, and strategic geographic locations, making them attractive to global investors.
In contrast, countries with less developed financial markets or those undergoing economic reforms often struggle to attract similar levels of investment. This disparity highlights the need for developing nations to enhance their investment climates through improved governance, infrastructure, and economic stability to compete on the global stage.
Overall, the 2010 FDI inflow data reveals a complex landscape where economic policies, geopolitical stability, and strategic positioning significantly influence a country's ability to attract foreign investment. These insights are crucial for policymakers aiming to boost their countries' economic growth and integration into the global economy.
Frequently Asked Questions About Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2010
Which country had the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
Liechtenstein had the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2010, with 588%.
Which country had the lowest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
Hungary had the lowest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2010, with -15.89%.
What was the average FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP across all countries in 2010?
The average FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP across all countries in 2010 was 12.13%.
What was the median FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
The median FDI inflow as a percentage of GDP in 2010 was 2.92%.
What were the top three countries with the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
The top three countries with the highest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2010 were Liechtenstein (588%), Cayman Islands (504%), and Cyprus (125%).
What were the bottom three countries with the lowest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
The bottom three countries with the lowest FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP in 2010 were Hungary (-15.89%), Suriname (-5.85%), and Marshall Islands (-5.81%).
Insights by country
North Macedonia
In 2010, North Macedonia ranked #90 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 3.2043822 %. This figure is lower than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting challenges in attracting foreign investment compared to countries like Serbia and Bulgaria. Key drivers for this performance include a relatively small market size and ongoing political and economic reforms aimed at improving the business environment.
Liberia
In 2010, Liberia ranked #4 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a remarkable 103.33739 %. This figure significantly surpasses the average for sub-Saharan Africa, highlighting Liberia's attractiveness to foreign investors. Key drivers include the country's rich natural resources, particularly in mining and agriculture, alongside post-conflict recovery efforts that have fostered a more favorable investment climate.
Algeria
In 2010, Algeria ranked #146 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 1.2939047 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in attracting foreign investment compared to more favorable environments in neighboring countries like Morocco. Key factors influencing this low inflow include Algeria's heavy reliance on hydrocarbons, regulatory barriers, and a complex business environment that deters foreign investors.
Comoros
In 2010, Comoros ranked #161 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 0.91966915 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating limited foreign investment in the country compared to more economically developed nations. Factors contributing to this low inflow include Comoros's geographic isolation, economic instability, and a lack of infrastructure, which deter potential investors.
Mauritius
Mauritius ranked #71 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2010, with a value of 4.2380857 %. This figure is notably higher than many regional peers, reflecting the country's appeal as a stable investment destination in the Indian Ocean. Factors contributing to this performance include Mauritius's strategic location, a favorable business environment, and proactive government policies aimed at attracting foreign investment.
Antigua and Barbuda
In 2010, Antigua and Barbuda achieved a global rank of #43 for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 7.218601 %. This figure is notable as it reflects a strong performance in attracting foreign direct investment relative to other Caribbean nations, which often experience lower inflows due to economic challenges. The country's favorable tax policies, particularly in the tourism and financial services sectors, have made it an attractive destination for investors looking to capitalize on its strategic geographic location and growing tourism industry.
Canada
In 2010, Canada ranked #133 globally with a Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) of 1.8372498 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average for that year, indicating challenges in attracting foreign investment compared to more competitive economies. Key factors influencing this statistic include Canada's stable political environment, rich natural resources, and strong trade agreements, which are often offset by high corporate tax rates and regulatory complexities that may deter some foreign investors.
Croatia
In 2010, Croatia ranked #111 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 2.619834 %. This figure is notably lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in attracting foreign investment compared to its regional peers. Key drivers for this statistic include Croatia's transition from a post-war economy and ongoing efforts to improve its business environment, alongside the impact of the global financial crisis on investor confidence.
Albania
In 2010, Albania ranked #34 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 9.01745 %. This figure is notable compared to many other countries in the region, indicating a relatively strong appeal for foreign investment. Key drivers of this performance include Albania's strategic location in the Balkans, its ongoing economic reforms, and efforts to improve the business environment, which have attracted investors seeking opportunities in emerging markets.
Georgia
In 2010, Georgia achieved a global rank of #42 with a Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) of 7.4106593 %. This figure is notable as it exceeds the regional average for Eastern Europe, reflecting Georgia's strategic location at the crossroads of Europe and Asia. The country's favorable investment climate, characterized by economic reforms and a commitment to attracting foreign capital, has significantly contributed to this robust FDI performance.
Belgium
In 2010, Belgium achieved a remarkable rank of #9 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) at 26.05964 %. This figure is significantly higher than the EU average, indicating Belgium's strong appeal to foreign investors compared to many of its neighbors. The country's central location in Europe, coupled with a highly skilled workforce and favorable tax policies, has made it an attractive destination for multinational corporations seeking to establish a foothold in the region.
Bhutan
In 2010, Bhutan ranked #67 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 4.404872 %. This figure reflects a significant level of foreign investment relative to its economic size, particularly when compared to regional neighbors like India, which has historically attracted larger FDI inflows. The country's unique approach to development, emphasizing Gross National Happiness and sustainable tourism, has created an appealing environment for foreign investors interested in eco-friendly projects.
Chile
In 2010, Chile ranked #45 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of 6.841447 %. This figure is notable compared to regional averages, reflecting Chile's position as one of the more stable and attractive markets in Latin America. Key drivers of this investment include Chile's robust mining sector, particularly copper, and its commitment to free trade agreements, which enhance its economic openness.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranked #25 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) in 2010, with a value of 11.349808 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country’s rich natural resources, particularly in mining and minerals. The influx of foreign direct investment is driven by the demand for cobalt and copper, essential for global electronics and renewable energy sectors.
Estonia
In 2010, Estonia achieved a global rank of #21 for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a remarkable value of 13.277033 %. This figure significantly surpassed the average FDI inflow in Europe, highlighting Estonia's attractiveness to foreign investors. Key factors contributing to this success include its strategic location as a gateway to Eastern Europe, a highly skilled workforce, and a pro-business regulatory environment that encourages innovation and investment.
Angola
In 2010, Angola ranked #186 globally for Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) with a value of -3.3776193 %. This negative inflow contrasts sharply with the average FDI inflows of neighboring countries in Southern Africa, which typically see positive contributions to GDP. The decline in foreign direct investment in Angola can be attributed to ongoing economic instability, reliance on oil exports, and challenges in the regulatory environment that deter investors.
Data Source
Foreign direct investment, net inflows as share of GDP | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is an online platform that provides comprehensive statistical data and research on global development topics. The dataset on foreign direct investment, net inflows as a share of GDP offers country-level statistics that illustrate the proportion of foreign investment relative to a nation's economic output.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Top FDI Inflows (% of GDP) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data