Human Development Index 2000
The Human Development Index combines indicators of health, education, and income to assess development levels.
Newer data is available: Human Development Index by country 2023 →
Where does your country rank? Pick it to see its position.
Related People and Society statistics
More ↓Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
- #1
Norway
- #2
Sweden
- #3
Iceland
- #4
Netherlands
- #5
Finland
- #6
Australia
- #7
Germany
- #8
Denmark
- #9
New Zealand
- #10
United States
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #171
Niger
- #170
Ethiopia
- #169
Chad
- #168
Burundi
- #167
Mozambique
- #166
Sierra Leone
- #165
Mali
- #164
Central African Republic
- #163
Djibouti
- #162
Rwanda
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Insights by country
Congo
In 2000, Congo achieved a Human Development Index of 0.545, ranking #124 out of 171 countries. This value is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in social and economic development. Key drivers include ongoing political instability and limited access to education and healthcare, which hinder human capital development. Additionally, the country's vast natural resources have not translated into widespread economic benefits for its population.
Chile
In 2000, Chile achieved a Human Development Index of 0.771, ranking #47 out of 171 countries. This score placed Chile above the regional average for Latin America, indicating a higher level of human development compared to many of its neighbors. Key drivers of this performance include Chile's stable economic growth, driven by a strong mining sector, and effective social policies that have improved education and healthcare access.
Gambia
In 2000, Gambia had a Human Development Index of 0.403, ranking #155 out of 171 countries. This value is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in development compared to higher-ranked nations. Key factors contributing to this low index include limited access to education and healthcare, as well as economic constraints primarily stemming from reliance on agriculture and tourism.
Albania
In 2000, Albania achieved a Human Development Index of 0.682, ranking #81 out of 171 countries. This placed Albania below the regional average for Southeast Europe, reflecting challenges in economic development compared to its neighbors. Key drivers of this index include the country's transition from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented system, which has impacted education and health outcomes significantly.
Brazil
In 2000, Brazil had a Human Development Index (HDI) of 0.69, ranking #76 out of 171 countries. This value was below the regional average for Latin America and the Caribbean, indicating challenges in social and economic development. Key factors influencing Brazil's HDI included significant income inequality, urbanization, and disparities in education and healthcare access across its diverse population.
South Korea
In 2000, South Korea achieved a Human Development Index of 0.83, ranking #27 out of 171 countries. This score places South Korea above the global average, reflecting significant advancements in health, education, and income. Key drivers of this development include rapid industrialization, robust education policies, and a strong emphasis on technology and innovation, which have collectively transformed its economy and improved living standards.
Brunei Darussalam
In 2000, Brunei Darussalam achieved a Human Development Index of 0.792, ranking #37 out of 171 countries. This places Brunei above the global average, reflecting its high income and quality of life compared to many nations. The country's wealth, primarily derived from its extensive oil and gas reserves, has enabled significant investments in health and education, contributing to its strong human development outcomes.
Tanzania
Tanzania's Human Development Index in 2000 was 0.414, ranking it #153 out of 171 countries. This score places Tanzania below the global average, reflecting significant challenges in health, education, and income compared to higher-ranked nations. Contributing factors to this low index include high levels of poverty, limited access to quality healthcare, and educational disparities, which have hindered overall human development progress.
Iceland
Iceland achieved a remarkable Human Development Index of 0.902 in 2000, ranking #3 out of 171 countries. This figure places Iceland well above the global average, reflecting its strong emphasis on social welfare and education. Key drivers of this high ranking include a robust economy supported by sustainable fisheries and renewable energy, along with a commitment to gender equality and high living standards.
Argentina
In 2000, Argentina achieved a Human Development Index of 0.789, ranking #40 out of 171 countries. This positioned Argentina above the regional average for Latin America, indicating a relatively high level of human development compared to its neighbors. Key drivers of this index include a diverse economy bolstered by agriculture and industry, alongside significant investments in education and healthcare, which have contributed to improved living standards.
Analysis & Context
In the year 2000, the Human Development Index (HDI) was led by Norway with a value of 0.924, while the global range spanned from 0.27 to 0.92. This index, which combines health, education, and income indicators, had a global average of 0.65, providing a broad view of human development levels across 171 countries.
Economic Prosperity and High Human Development
The top-ranking countries in the Human Development Index for 2000, such as Norway (0.924), Sweden (0.912), and Iceland (0.902), share common economic characteristics that underpin their high HDI scores. These nations benefit from robust economies, characterized by high GDP per capita, extensive social welfare systems, and equitable income distribution. For instance, Norway’s wealth, largely driven by its oil reserves, has been effectively channeled into comprehensive public services, enhancing education and healthcare outcomes. Similarly, the Nordic model emphasizes social safety nets and public investment in human capital, which contribute to their leading positions in the HDI rankings.
Challenges in Low Human Development Countries
At the lower end of the spectrum, countries like Niger (0.266), Ethiopia (0.293), and Chad (0.303) face significant hurdles that impede human development. These nations often grapple with a combination of factors, including political instability, limited access to quality healthcare and education, and low income levels. For example, Niger’s development is constrained by its predominantly agrarian economy, which is vulnerable to climate change and lacks diversification. Furthermore, high population growth rates in these regions strain already limited resources, exacerbating the challenges in improving HDI scores.
Influence of Policy on Human Development
Policy initiatives play a crucial role in shaping the Human Development Index outcomes. Countries like Germany (0.897) and Australia (0.897) have successfully implemented policies that prioritize education and healthcare, leading to high HDI scores. Germany’s dual education system, which integrates vocational training with academic education, is a notable example of policy-driven human capital enhancement. Similarly, Australia’s universal healthcare system ensures widespread access to medical services, contributing to its high life expectancy and overall human development.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
The year 2000 saw an average HDI increase of 0.01 (1.1%), with some countries experiencing significant improvements. Liberia marked the largest increase, with a 9.9% rise in its HDI, reflecting post-conflict recovery efforts and international aid focused on rebuilding infrastructure and social services. Similarly, Rwanda and Estonia each recorded a 0.02 increase, driven by economic reforms and investments in education. Conversely, countries like Eswatini and South Africa experienced declines of 0.01, attributed to economic challenges and public health crises, including the impact of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
The data from the year 2000 highlights the multifaceted nature of the Human Development Index, where economic strength, effective policy, and social stability converge to enhance human development. By understanding these patterns, policymakers can better address the challenges faced by lower-ranking countries and work towards more equitable global development.
Frequently Asked Questions About Human Development Index in 2000
Which country had the highest Human Development Index in 2000?
Norway had the highest Human Development Index in 2000 with a value of 0.92.
Which country had the lowest Human Development Index in 2000?
Niger had the lowest Human Development Index in 2000 with a value of 0.27.
What was the average Human Development Index value in 2000?
The average Human Development Index value in 2000 was 0.65.
What was the median Human Development Index value in 2000?
The median Human Development Index value in 2000 was 0.67.
What were the top 3 countries by Human Development Index in 2000?
The top 3 countries by Human Development Index in 2000 were Norway (0.92), Sweden (0.91), and Iceland (0.9).
What were the bottom 3 countries by Human Development Index in 2000?
The bottom 3 countries by Human Development Index in 2000 were Niger (0.27), Ethiopia (0.29), and Chad (0.3).
Data Source
Human Development Index | UNDP, Human Development Report via Our World in Data
Data produced by UNDP, Human Development Report, compiled and published by Our World in Data as "Human Development Index".
Visit Data SourceCite this page
Geo Factbook. (n.d.). Human Development Index by Country, 2000. Retrieved November 13, 2026, from https://geofactbook.com/fact/human-development-index/2000
The figures on this page come from Human Development Index | UNDP, Human Development Report via Our World in Data. For academic work, cite the original source as well.
›Embed this ranking on your site
Free to embed with attribution. Shows the top 10 countries and links back to the full ranking.