Administrative Divisions 2004
Explore administrative divisions across 266+ countries with interactive maps and rankings to understand regional governance and demographics.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
- #1
Aruba
- #2
North Macedonia
- #3
Philippines
- #4
Azerbaijan
- #5
Algeria
- #6
Romania
- #7
Nigeria
- #8
Afghanistan
- #9
Colombia
- #10
Republic of Moldova
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #216
Eswatini
- #215
Zimbabwe
- #214
Zambia
- #213
Samoa
- #212
Wallis and Futuna Islands
- #211
Holy See
- #210
United States Virgin Islands
- #209
British Virgin Islands
- #208
United Kingdom
- #207
Taiwan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2004, Slovenia led the world with the highest number of Administrative Divisions, totaling 182, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 182 across the countries surveyed. The global average number of administrative divisions was approximately 17.92, with a median of 12.00, providing a broad spectrum of governance structures worldwide.
Concentration of Administrative Divisions
The distribution of administrative divisions across countries in 2004 highlights distinct regional governance structures. Slovenia and North Macedonia stand out with 182 and 123 divisions, respectively. These high numbers can be attributed to the emphasis on localized governance, possibly driven by historical, cultural, and political factors that necessitate more granular administrative oversight.
In contrast, countries like Saint Helena and Sao Tome and Principe have as few as 1 and 2 divisions, respectively. These low numbers are often found in smaller or less densely populated regions where centralized governance is more feasible and efficient due to limited geographical area and population.
Economic and Geographic Influences
Geographical size and population density often influence the number of administrative divisions. For instance, the United States, with 50 states, reflects a balance between a large geographic area and the need for decentralized governance to manage diverse regional interests. Similarly, Turkey and the Philippines have 81 and 79 divisions, which may be influenced by their geographical diversity and significant population sizes, necessitating more localized administrative units to effectively manage governance and public services.
Conversely, Luxembourg and Greenland have 3 divisions each, illustrating how smaller nations or territories may function efficiently with fewer divisions due to their compact geography or lower population densities.
Year-over-Year Trends and Changes
Analyzing the year-over-year changes, some countries experienced significant shifts in their administrative structures. The Republic of Moldova saw an increase of 23.00 divisions, a dramatic 255.6% rise, likely reflecting administrative reforms or decentralization efforts aimed at improving local governance. Similarly, the Philippines increased by 6.00 divisions, an 8.2% growth, which may indicate efforts to better manage its archipelagic geography.
On the other hand, Côte d'Ivoire experienced the most significant decrease, reducing its divisions by 39.00, a 67.2% contraction, possibly due to a consolidation of administrative units for improved governance efficiency. Morocco and Iceland also saw reductions of 21.00 and 15.00 divisions, respectively, potentially reflecting similar consolidation efforts or policy shifts.
Implications for Governance and Policy
The number of administrative divisions within a country can significantly impact its governance and policy implementation. High division counts, like those in Slovenia and Turkey, may facilitate more tailored local policies and better resource allocation, addressing specific regional needs. However, it can also pose challenges in terms of coordination and standardization across divisions.
In countries with fewer divisions, such as Saint Helena or Luxembourg, central governance can be more streamlined, but it may struggle to address local issues effectively without adequate local representation. The balance between centralization and decentralization remains a critical consideration for policymakers aiming to optimize administrative efficiency and responsiveness.
Insights by country
United States Virgin Islands
The United States Virgin Islands ranked #215 in 2004 for Administrative Divisions, with a value of none as it is a territory of the US. This lack of first-order administrative divisions is in stark contrast to many countries in the Caribbean, which often have multiple layers of governance. The territory consists of three main islands—Saint Croix, Saint John, and Saint Thomas—reflecting its geographic composition rather than a complex administrative structure.
New Caledonia
In 2004, New Caledonia ranked #203 with none for Administrative Divisions. This places it among the lowest globally, with no first-order administrative divisions recognized by the US Government, contrasting with many neighboring Pacific islands that have defined divisions. New Caledonia is an overseas territory of France, which influences its administrative structure, as it operates under French governance rather than a typical autonomous system.
Timor-Leste
In 2004, Timor-Leste ranked #90 globally with 13 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to its neighbor Indonesia, which has over 30 divisions, indicating a more centralized administrative structure. The limited number of divisions reflects Timor-Leste's small population and geographic size, as well as its historical context following independence in 2002, which influenced its administrative organization.
Lebanon
In 2004, Lebanon had a global rank of #160 out of 216 countries with a total of 6 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to neighboring countries like Syria, which has 14 divisions, indicating a less complex administrative structure. The limited number of divisions can be attributed to Lebanon's small geographic size and its historical context of centralized governance influenced by its diverse demographic groups.
Martinique
In 2004, Martinique ranked #200 globally with none for Administrative Divisions, reflecting its status as an overseas department of France. This is significantly lower than many Caribbean nations that possess greater administrative autonomy. The lack of distinct administrative divisions is primarily due to Martinique's integration into the French administrative system, which centralizes governance and policy-making in Paris.
Nepal
In 2004, Nepal ranked #81 globally with 14 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to its neighbor India, which has 28 states and union territories, highlighting Nepal's unique administrative structure. The limited number of divisions can be attributed to its diverse geography and the need for efficient governance in a country characterized by mountainous terrain and varying ethnic groups.
Mozambique
In 2004, Mozambique had 10 administrative divisions, ranking #115 out of 216 countries. This number is relatively low compared to many neighboring countries in Southern Africa, which often have more subdivisions to manage local governance. The administrative structure in Mozambique reflects its historical context and ongoing efforts to decentralize governance, aiming to enhance local administration and service delivery in a nation characterized by diverse ethnic groups and significant geographical variation.
Mexico
In 2004, Mexico ranked #22 globally with 31 Administrative Divisions. This number is notably higher than many Latin American countries, reflecting Mexico's federal structure, which includes states and municipalities. The country's diverse geography and large population necessitate a complex administrative framework to manage regional governance effectively.
Niger
In 2004, Niger ranked #148 globally with 7 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to regional neighbors like Nigeria, which has 36 divisions, indicating a less complex administrative structure. The limited number of divisions reflects Niger's vast, sparsely populated geography and historical governance challenges, which have influenced its administrative organization and resource allocation.
Portugal
In 2004, Portugal ranked #61 globally with 18 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to its neighbor Spain, which has 17 autonomous communities and 2 autonomous cities. The structure of Portugal's administrative divisions reflects its historical governance and the centralization of power, which has influenced regional administration and local governance practices. Additionally, Portugal's geographic size and population density contribute to its streamlined division system, facilitating administrative efficiency.
Data Source
CIA World Factbook
The World Factbook, also known as the CIA World Factbook, was a reference resource produced by the US Central Intelligence Agency between 1962 and 2026 with almanac-style information about the countries of the world. From 1971 it was not classified, and available to the public in print since 1975, initially by the CIA, and later the Government Publishing Office.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Administrative Divisions data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data