Administrative Divisions 1992
Explore administrative divisions across 266+ countries with interactive maps and rankings to understand regional governance and demographics.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
- #1
Croatia
- #2
Algeria
- #3
Afghanistan
- #4
Albania
- #5
American Samoa
- #6
Bangladesh
- #7
Burkina Faso
- #8
Brazil
- #9
Argentina
- #10
China
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #210
Wallis and Futuna Islands
- #209
United States Virgin Islands
- #208
United Arab Emirates
- #207
Tuvalu
- #206
Turks and Caicos Islands
- #205
Turkmenistan
- #204
Tonga
- #203
Tokelau
- #202
Tajikistan
- #201
Zimbabwe
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1992, Croatia led the world in the number of Administrative Divisions with a total of 102, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 102 across the 166 countries with available data. The global average for Administrative Divisions stood at 17.57, with a median value of 13.00, reflecting a diverse landscape of regional governance worldwide.
Factors Influencing High Administrative Division Counts
The variation in the number of administrative divisions among countries can often be attributed to historical, geographic, and political influences. Countries like Croatia and New Zealand, with 102 and 93 divisions respectively, illustrate the potential impact of decentralization policies aimed at enhancing local governance. In Croatia's case, the post-Yugoslavian restructuring likely necessitated a finer administrative division to manage regional governance effectively. Similarly, New Zealand's high count may be influenced by its geographic isolation and the need to manage diverse regional needs across its islands. Meanwhile, countries such as the Philippines and Thailand, each with 72 divisions, reflect a strategy to manage complex socio-cultural and geographic landscapes, necessitating a more granular administrative approach to address local governance and development needs.
Low Administrative Division Counts: Simplified Governance
In contrast, countries with fewer administrative divisions, such as Azerbaijan and Saint Helena with only 1 division each, often adopt a centralized governance model. This can be due to smaller geographic size or a less complex demographic makeup, which reduces the need for extensive administrative segmentation. Greenland and Luxembourg, each with 3 divisions, exemplify how geographic and population factors influence administrative simplicity, allowing for streamlined governance without the need for extensive regional structures.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The year-over-year changes in administrative divisions reveal strategic shifts in governance approaches. Notably, Vietnam and Nigeria saw the most significant increases, each adding 9 divisions, representing growth rates of 22.0% and 42.9% respectively. For Vietnam, this expansion could indicate efforts to improve administrative efficiency in response to rapid economic growth and urbanization. In Nigeria, the increase may reflect attempts to better manage Africa's largest economy through enhanced local governance structures.
Conversely, Libya experienced a substantial decrease, with a reduction of 21 divisions, a 45.7% decline, possibly as part of political restructuring efforts during a period of significant national change. Similarly, Ethiopia saw an 11-division decrease (-44.0%), potentially linked to efforts to streamline governance amidst internal political dynamics.
The Role of Demographics and Policy in Administrative Division Trends
Demographic pressures and policy decisions play crucial roles in shaping administrative division trends. Countries with larger populations or diverse ethnic groups often require more divisions to effectively manage regional needs and maintain social cohesion. For instance, Bangladesh, with 64 divisions, utilizes this structure to address its high population density and cultural diversity. Meanwhile, policy-driven changes, such as those seen in Equatorial Guinea, which experienced a 250.0% increase with the addition of 5 divisions, highlight how governmental strategies can lead to rapid administrative restructuring for improved regional governance.
Overall, the landscape of administrative divisions in 1992 showcases a complex interplay of historical, geographic, and policy factors that continue to shape governance structures across the globe. By understanding these patterns, we gain insight into how countries balance regional autonomy with national unity, addressing both current needs and future challenges.
Insights by country
Madagascar
In 1992, Madagascar ranked #144 globally with 6 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to regional neighbors such as Mozambique, which has a more extensive administrative structure. Madagascar's limited number of divisions can be attributed to its geographic isolation and historical governance structures, which have influenced the distribution of administrative responsibilities across the island nation.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked #202 globally in 1992, with 4 Administrative Divisions: Western Area and the three provinces of Eastern, Northern, and Southern. This number is relatively low compared to many countries in the region, which often have more subdivisions for governance and administration.
The limited number of administrative divisions reflects Sierra Leone's geographic and demographic factors, including its history of civil conflict and economic challenges that have hindered effective governance. Additionally, the country's division structure is influenced by its need to manage resources and services across diverse rural and urban populations.
Republic of Moldova
The Republic of Moldova ranked #190 globally with 40 administrative divisions in 1992. This number is relatively high compared to regional neighbors like Romania, which had fewer divisions at that time. The extensive division structure was influenced by Moldova's historical governance and the need for localized administration following its independence from the Soviet Union, as the country sought to establish effective local governance amid economic and political transitions.
Mozambique
In 1992, Mozambique had 10 administrative divisions, ranking #102 out of 210 countries. This number is relatively low compared to regional neighbors like South Africa, which has 9 provinces, indicating a different administrative structure. The country's history of civil conflict and economic challenges have influenced its administrative organization, limiting the establishment of more divisions that could facilitate regional governance and development.
Mali
In 1992, Mali ranked #125 globally with 8 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to many neighboring countries, which often have more complex administrative structures. The limited number of divisions can be attributed to Mali's vast geographic expanse and the historical context of its governance, which has focused on centralization amidst diverse ethnic groups and regional disparities.
Malta
In 1992, Malta ranked #188 globally with no administrative divisions, as the administration is managed directly from Valletta. This lack of subdivisions is notable compared to many neighboring countries in Europe, which typically have multiple levels of local governance. The centralized administrative structure in Malta is influenced by its small geographic size and population, which allows for efficient governance without the need for further division. Additionally, Malta's historical context as a former colony has shaped its administrative practices, focusing authority in the capital.
Martinique
In 1992, Martinique ranked #189 globally for Administrative Divisions, with a value of none as it is an overseas department of France. This lack of distinct administrative divisions places it significantly behind many other countries, particularly those with multiple subdivisions that enhance local governance. The key driver for this ranking is Martinique's status as a French overseas department, which means it operates under the administrative framework of France rather than having independent divisions.
Poland
In 1992, Poland ranked #11 globally with 49 Administrative Divisions. This figure is significantly higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting Poland's extensive local governance structure. The division of the country into numerous administrative units facilitates local administration and governance, which is crucial for managing its diverse population and regional needs following the political changes of the early 1990s.
Nauru
Nauru ranked #76 globally with 14 Administrative Divisions in 1992. This number is relatively low compared to larger nations, which often have more complex administrative structures. The simplicity of Nauru's governance reflects its small geographic size and population, leading to a straightforward administrative framework that is efficient for its limited resources and demographic needs.
Puerto Rico
In 1992, Puerto Rico ranked #197 globally for Administrative Divisions with a value of none, as it is a commonwealth associated with the United States. This ranking places Puerto Rico among the lowest in the world, reflecting its unique political status compared to fully sovereign nations. The absence of administrative divisions is primarily due to its governance structure, which is directly influenced by U.S. federal policies and regulations, limiting local autonomy in administrative matters.
Data Source
CIA World Factbook
The World Factbook, also known as the CIA World Factbook, was a reference resource produced by the US Central Intelligence Agency between 1962 and 2026 with almanac-style information about the countries of the world. From 1971 it was not classified, and available to the public in print since 1975, initially by the CIA, and later the Government Publishing Office.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Administrative Divisions data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data