Administrative Divisions 1996
Explore administrative divisions across 266+ countries with interactive maps and rankings to understand regional governance and demographics.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
- #1
Bosnia and Herzegovina
- #2
Algeria
- #3
Afghanistan
- #4
Burkina Faso
- #5
Albania
- #6
American Samoa
- #7
Azerbaijan
- #8
Côte d'Ivoire
- #9
Colombia
- #10
Brazil
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #209
Wallis and Futuna Islands
- #208
United States Virgin Islands
- #207
Tuvalu
- #206
Turks and Caicos Islands
- #205
Tonga
- #204
Tokelau
- #203
Tajikistan
- #202
Taiwan
- #201
Singapore
- #200
Sao Tome and Principe
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1996, Bosnia and Herzegovina led the world in Administrative Divisions with a total of 109, while the range of divisions across 176 countries spanned from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 109. The global average number of administrative divisions was 17.69, with a median of 13.00. These figures highlight the diversity in regional governance structures worldwide.
Understanding the Extremes: High and Low Administrative Divisions
The distribution of Administrative Divisions in 1996 reveals significant disparities among countries. Bosnia and Herzegovina stands at the top with 109 divisions, a reflection of its complex post-conflict governance structure designed to accommodate various ethnic groups. In contrast, Saint Helena has only 1 administrative division, indicative of its small population and geographic isolation.
Other countries with high numbers of divisions include New Zealand with 93 and Thailand with 76. These figures can be attributed to their decentralized governance models, which aim to provide local autonomy and efficient administration. On the other hand, countries like Tajikistan and Georgia, each with only 2 divisions, reflect centralized governance systems where regional subdivisions are minimal.
Regional Governance and Economic Implications
Administrative divisions often correlate with a country's economic and demographic characteristics. In the case of Vietnam and Côte d'Ivoire, each with 50 divisions, these numbers reflect efforts to manage diverse populations and regional economic activities. Both countries have regions with distinct cultural and economic profiles, necessitating a more segmented administrative approach.
Conversely, small nations or territories like Luxembourg and Montserrat, each with only 3 divisions, manage their affairs with fewer subdivisions due to their smaller geographic and demographic scales. This streamlined governance can facilitate more direct and efficient administrative processes.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Drivers
Examining year-over-year changes in Administrative Divisions reveals both stability and volatility. The average change was a slight decrease of -0.05 divisions (-0.3%). The most notable decrease occurred in Ethiopia, with a reduction of 5 divisions, amounting to a significant -35.7% change. This reduction may be linked to political restructuring aimed at consolidating regions for improved governance.
Increases were modest, with Iran showing the largest rise by just 1 division (4.2%). This slight increase might reflect minor administrative adjustments rather than major policy shifts. Meanwhile, countries like Paraguay and Nicaragua experienced reductions of 2 and 1 divisions, respectively, suggesting efforts to streamline administrative operations.
Geopolitical and Demographic Influences
The number of Administrative Divisions is often influenced by geopolitical and demographic factors. For instance, countries with diverse ethnic compositions, such as Thailand and Philippines (76 and 72 divisions, respectively), may have more divisions to ensure representation and autonomy for various groups. This approach can help in mitigating ethnic tensions and fostering national unity.
In contrast, smaller or more homogeneous countries like Brunei Darussalam with 4 divisions, maintain fewer subdivisions, reflecting both limited geographic size and a more uniform population. This simplicity in governance can aid in rapid policy implementation and resource allocation.
Overall, the data from 1996 on Administrative Divisions provides a window into how different countries structure their internal governance to meet unique geographic, economic, and demographic needs. Understanding these divisions is crucial for grasping the complexities of regional governance and its implications for national development.
Insights by country
Latvia
In 1996, Latvia had 30 rank in the world for Administrative Divisions, with a total of 26 divisions. This places Latvia among the countries with a relatively high number of administrative divisions compared to its Baltic neighbors, Estonia and Lithuania. The structure of these divisions reflects Latvia's historical governance and regional diversity, which is shaped by its geographic position and demographic distribution following independence from the Soviet Union.
Equatorial Guinea
In 1996, Equatorial Guinea had 7 administrative divisions, ranking #140 out of 209 countries. This number is relatively low compared to many neighboring countries in Central Africa, which often have more complex administrative structures. The limited number of divisions can be attributed to Equatorial Guinea's small population and geographic size, which influences its governance and administrative needs.
Haiti
In 1996, Haiti ranked #118 globally with 9 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to many other countries in the region, reflecting Haiti's unique administrative structure. The country's historical challenges, including political instability and economic difficulties, have influenced its administrative organization and governance capacity.
Hungary
In 1996, Hungary ranked #17 globally with 38 Administrative Divisions. This number is notable as it is higher than many of its regional peers, reflecting a well-structured local governance system. The administrative divisions in Hungary are primarily driven by its historical context and the need for effective regional management, balancing economic development and cultural diversity across the country.
Ireland
In 1996, Ireland had 26 administrative divisions, ranking #29 out of 209 countries. This number is relatively high compared to some of its European neighbors, reflecting a commitment to local governance. The structure of these divisions is influenced by Ireland's historical context, including its counties and the need for effective regional administration to support economic development and public services.
Argentina
In 1996, Argentina ranked #42 globally with 23 Administrative Divisions. This number is notable when compared to neighboring Brazil, which has 26 divisions, highlighting Argentina's relatively streamlined administrative structure. The country's divisions are largely influenced by its historical development and geographic diversity, which includes vast regions such as Patagonia and the Pampas, necessitating distinct administrative oversight.
Japan
In 1996, Japan ranked #12 globally with 47 Administrative Divisions. This figure is notable compared to its regional neighbors, as many countries in East Asia have fewer divisions, reflecting Japan's unique governance structure. The extensive number of divisions is driven by Japan's geographic diversity and historical administrative practices, which cater to its complex urban and rural landscapes.
Cameroon
In 1996, Cameroon had 10 Administrative Divisions, ranking #99 out of 209 countries. This number is relatively low compared to many other African nations, which often have more subdivisions for local governance. The structure of Cameroon's divisions is influenced by its colonial history, where French and British administrative practices shaped the current divisions, alongside the country's diverse ethnic groups and geographic features that necessitate localized governance.
Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan ranked #151 globally with 6 Administrative Divisions in 1996. This number is relatively low compared to regional neighbors, which often have more extensive administrative structures. The limited number of divisions can be attributed to Kyrgyzstan's geographic size and its post-Soviet administrative legacy, which has influenced the decentralization of governance in the country.
Greenland
In 1996, Greenland ranked #169 globally with 3 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to many other countries, reflecting its vast geographic size and sparse population. The limited administrative divisions are primarily driven by Greenland's unique geographic challenges and its status as an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, which influences its governance structure and local administrative needs.
Data Source
CIA World Factbook
The World Factbook, also known as the CIA World Factbook, was a reference resource produced by the US Central Intelligence Agency between 1962 and 2026 with almanac-style information about the countries of the world. From 1971 it was not classified, and available to the public in print since 1975, initially by the CIA, and later the Government Publishing Office.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Administrative Divisions data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data