Administrative Divisions 2000
Explore administrative divisions across 266+ countries with interactive maps and rankings to understand regional governance and demographics.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #214
Wallis and Futuna Islands
- #213
United States Virgin Islands
- #212
British Virgin Islands
- #211
Taiwan
- #210
Tuvalu
- #209
Sao Tome and Principe
- #208
Tonga
- #207
Tokelau
- #206
Turks and Caicos Islands
- #205
Singapore
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In the year 2000, Slovenia led the world in the number of Administrative Divisions with a total of 136. The global range of administrative divisions spanned from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 136. The average number of administrative divisions across the 181 countries with available data was 18.51, providing a benchmark for understanding governance structures worldwide.
Understanding the Extremes: Slovenia vs. Saint Helena
Slovenia's position as the country with the most administrative divisions can be attributed to its decentralized governance model, which emphasizes local autonomy and efficient regional management. This structure facilitates tailored governance and economic policies at a local level. In contrast, Saint Helena had the fewest divisions, with just 1, reflective of its small population and geographic size, which do not necessitate further administrative subdivisions. Countries like Sao Tome and Principe and Tajikistan also had minimal administrative divisions, reinforcing the correlation between the size of a country, both in terms of geography and population, and the complexity of its administrative structure.
Regional Governance Patterns
Countries with extensive administrative divisions often have diverse populations or complex geographic landscapes. For instance, New Zealand, with 93 divisions, manages its governance across various islands and regions, each with unique needs and identities. Similarly, Turkey and Thailand, with 80 and 76 divisions respectively, manage vast and diverse territories that require nuanced governance approaches to address regional disparities and promote balanced development. The presence of numerous divisions in these countries facilitates localized governance, enabling more effective policy implementation and public service delivery.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The average year-over-year change in the number of administrative divisions was a slight decrease of -0.12 divisions, or -0.3%. However, some countries experienced significant changes. Nigeria saw the most substantial increase, adding 6 divisions, a 20.0% rise, reflecting its ongoing efforts to manage Africa's largest economy and diverse ethnic landscape more effectively. Iran also increased its divisions by 3, a 12.0% growth, likely in response to its complex social and geographic challenges.
Conversely, the Republic of Moldova experienced the most significant decrease, shedding 30 divisions, a -75.0% reduction. This drastic change could be linked to efforts to streamline governance and improve administrative efficiency. Other countries like Indonesia and Croatia saw minor reductions, reflecting adjustments in administrative strategies to enhance governance effectiveness.
Economic and Policy Drivers
The number of administrative divisions in a country is often influenced by economic and policy considerations. Countries with rapidly growing economies, such as Vietnam and Philippines (both with 73 divisions), may establish more divisions to better manage economic development and regional disparities. These divisions allow for more targeted policy-making, which can be crucial for sustaining economic growth and addressing regional inequalities.
In countries like Greece and Georgia, with 51 and 53 divisions respectively, historical and political factors play a significant role. Historical governance structures and the need to accommodate diverse political and ethnic groups often lead to a higher number of administrative divisions. This division aids in maintaining political stability and fostering social cohesion by ensuring representation for various groups within the governmental framework.
The analysis of administrative divisions in 2000 reveals a complex interplay of geographic, economic, and political factors that shape how countries organize their governance structures. Understanding these patterns provides valuable insights into the challenges and strategies nations employ to manage their territories effectively.
Insights by country
Aruba
In 2000, Aruba ranked #200 with none for Administrative Divisions, indicating its status as part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. This places Aruba among the lowest globally, as many countries have distinct administrative divisions for governance. The absence of separate divisions is largely due to Aruba's small geographic size and population, which simplifies its administrative structure and aligns with its governance under Dutch sovereignty.
Singapore
In 2000, Singapore ranked #208 globally for Administrative Divisions, with a value of none. This ranking is notably low compared to its regional neighbors, which typically have multiple administrative units. Singapore's unique status as a city-state, with a compact geographic area and a centralized governance structure, contributes to the absence of distinct administrative divisions.
Saudi Arabia
In 2000, Saudi Arabia had 13 Administrative Divisions, ranking #92 out of 214 countries. This number is relatively low compared to its regional neighbors, reflecting the kingdom's vast geographical expanse and centralized governance structure. The limited number of divisions is driven by Saudi Arabia's focus on maintaining strong administrative control over its territories, which is critical for managing its significant oil resources and ensuring national security.
Togo
Togo ranked #167 globally in 2000 with 5 Administrative Divisions. This number is lower than many of its West African neighbors, reflecting a relatively simple administrative structure compared to countries like Ghana, which has more divisions. The limited number of divisions in Togo can be attributed to its smaller geographic size and population, which influences governance and administrative efficiency.
United Arab Emirates
In 2000, the United Arab Emirates ranked #147 globally with 7 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, which typically have more divisions to manage their administrative needs. The UAE's unique federal structure, consisting of seven emirates, allows for a centralized governance model that supports its rapid economic development and urbanization.
Suriname
In 2000, Suriname ranked #115 globally with 10 Administrative Divisions. This number is relatively low compared to regional neighbors like French Guiana, which has a more complex administrative structure. The limited number of divisions in Suriname can be attributed to its small population and geographic size, which influences administrative efficiency and governance.
New Zealand
In 2000, New Zealand ranked #2 globally with 93 Administrative Divisions, indicating a robust local governance structure. This figure is significantly higher than many countries, reflecting New Zealand's commitment to decentralized administration compared to the global average. The extensive network of divisions is driven by the country's geographic diversity and the need for tailored local governance to address varying regional needs.
Lithuania
In 2000, Lithuania ranked #17 globally with 44 Administrative Divisions. This figure is notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting a robust local governance structure. The number of divisions is driven by Lithuania's historical context and efforts to decentralize administrative power following its independence from the Soviet Union. These divisions facilitate local administration and public service delivery across the country.
Zimbabwe
In 2000, Zimbabwe had 8 Administrative Divisions, ranking #138 out of 214 countries. This number is relatively low compared to regional neighbors like South Africa, which has nine provinces, indicating a different administrative structure. The limited number of divisions reflects Zimbabwe's historical context, where colonial boundaries and centralized governance have shaped its administrative divisions and local governance policies.
Thailand
In 2000, Thailand ranked #4 globally with 76 Administrative Divisions. This figure is significantly higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting the country's extensive local governance structure. The high number of divisions is driven by Thailand's diverse geography and population distribution, which necessitates localized administration to effectively manage resources and services across urban and rural areas.
Data Source
CIA World Factbook
The World Factbook, also known as the CIA World Factbook, was a reference resource produced by the US Central Intelligence Agency between 1962 and 2026 with almanac-style information about the countries of the world. From 1971 it was not classified, and available to the public in print since 1975, initially by the CIA, and later the Government Publishing Office.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Administrative Divisions data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data