Protected Land Area Percentage 2018

Fiji

In 2018, Fiji ranked #169 globally with a Protected Land Area Percentage of 5.4%. This figure is notably lower than the global average of approximately 15% for protected land areas. The limited protection in Fiji can be attributed to its focus on tourism and agriculture, which often prioritize land development over conservation efforts.

Djibouti

In 2018, Djibouti ranked #198 globally with a Protected Land Area Percentage of 1.6%. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting Djibouti's limited natural resources and arid climate. The country's focus on economic development, particularly in port services and logistics, often prioritizes industrial growth over environmental conservation.

Israel

In 2018, Israel ranked #75 globally with a Protected Land Area Percentage of 19.9 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating a significant opportunity for expansion in conservation efforts. Factors contributing to this statistic include Israel's high population density and urban development pressures, which prioritize land for housing and agriculture over preservation.

Gibraltar

In 2018, Gibraltar ranked #28 globally for Protected Land Area Percentage, with a value of 32.4 %. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, illustrating Gibraltar's commitment to environmental conservation. The key drivers behind this statistic include its small geographic size, which allows for focused conservation efforts, and a strong local policy framework prioritizing the protection of natural habitats.

Botswana

Botswana ranked #38 globally with a Protected Land Area Percentage of 29.1% in 2018. This figure is notable as it exceeds the global average, reflecting the country's commitment to conservation compared to many nations. Key drivers of this high percentage include Botswana's vast landscapes and a strong policy framework focused on wildlife preservation and eco-tourism, which are vital to its economy.

Kenya

In 2018, Kenya ranked #124 globally with a Protected Land Area Percentage of 12.4%. This figure is below the global average, indicating a need for enhanced conservation efforts compared to top-ranked countries like Bhutan, which boasts over 50% protected land. Key drivers of Kenya's protected land area include its rich biodiversity and the ongoing challenges of balancing economic development with conservation policies, particularly in areas heavily reliant on tourism and agriculture.

Eritrea

Eritrea ranked #170 globally with a Protected Land Area Percentage of 4.9% in 2018. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating limited areas designated for conservation compared to countries with more robust environmental policies.

The low percentage can be attributed to Eritrea's focus on economic development and agricultural expansion, which often prioritizes land use over preservation. Additionally, the country's challenging geographic conditions and limited resources hinder the establishment of protected areas.

Italy

In 2018, Italy ranked #69 globally with a Protected Land Area Percentage of 21.5%. This percentage is relatively high compared to some neighboring countries, reflecting Italy's commitment to preserving its diverse ecosystems. Key drivers behind this statistic include Italy's rich biodiversity, extensive national parks, and strong environmental protection policies that prioritize conservation efforts in both urban and rural areas.

Chad

In 2018, Chad ranked #72 globally with a Protected Land Area Percentage of 20.4%. This percentage is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Chad's commitment to conservation in a region where environmental challenges are significant. The country's diverse ecosystems, including the Sahelian and Saharan landscapes, drive the need for protected areas to safeguard biodiversity and combat desertification.

South Korea

In 2018, South Korea achieved a Protected Land Area Percentage of 11.7 %, ranking #129 out of 210 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating a limited commitment to land conservation compared to higher-ranking nations. The relatively low percentage can be attributed to South Korea's rapid urbanization and industrial development, which have prioritized economic growth over environmental preservation.