Labor Productivity Output 2002
Labor productivity output measures economic efficiency by calculating GDP per hour worked in each country.
Newer data is available: Labor Productivity Output by country 2023 →
Where does your country rank? Pick it to see its position.
Related Economy statistics
More ↓Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Norway | 87.464 USD | |
2 | Luxembourg | 71.854 USD | |
3 | Netherlands | 66.047 USD | |
4 | Belgium | 64.025 USD | |
5 | France | 63.588 USD | |
6 | United Kingdom | 63.061 USD | |
7 | Sweden | 63.057 USD | |
8 | United States | 61.877 USD | |
9 | Germany | 60.346 USD | |
10 | Ireland | 60.147 USD | |
11 | Denmark | 58.695 USD | |
12 | Austria | 56.26 USD | |
13 | Finland | 55.761 USD | |
14 | Switzerland | 55.722 USD | |
15 | Australia | 55.344 USD | |
16 | Italy | 53.204 USD | |
17 | Canada | 52.196 USD | |
18 | Iceland | 51.287 USD | |
19 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 47.627 USD | |
20 | Japan | 46.569 USD | |
21 | Spain | 45.946 USD | |
22 | Taiwan | 45.697 USD | |
23 | Israel | 45.242 USD | |
24 | Cyprus | 41.217 USD | |
25 | New Zealand | 40.308 USD | |
26 | Greece | 38.018 USD | |
27 | Singapore | 34.864 USD | |
28 | Slovenia | 34.664 USD | |
29 | Malta | 32.989 USD | |
30 | Czech Republic | 31.331 USD | |
31 | Portugal | 30.289 USD | |
32 | Slovakia | 30.031 USD | |
33 | Hungary | 29.387 USD | |
34 | South Korea | 27.433 USD | |
35 | Poland | 26.685 USD | |
36 | Croatia | 26.129 USD | |
37 | Mexico | 26.035 USD | |
38 | Trinidad and Tobago | 24.674 USD | |
39 | Lithuania | 23.844 USD | |
40 | Turkey | 23.539 USD | |
41 | Estonia | 21.936 USD | |
42 | Argentina | 20.691 USD | |
43 | Latvia | 20.476 USD | |
44 | Bulgaria | 20.168 USD | |
45 | Uruguay | 18.99 USD | |
46 | South Africa | 17.391 USD | |
47 | Malaysia | 16.218 USD | |
48 | Chile | 15.619 USD | |
49 | Costa Rica | 13.245 USD | |
50 | Dominican Republic | 13.082 USD | |
51 | Romania | 12.961 USD | |
52 | Venezuela | 12.257 USD | |
53 | Brazil | 12.234 USD | |
54 | Russia | 11.601 USD | |
55 | Colombia | 9.711 USD | |
56 | Ecuador | 8.944 USD | |
57 | Jamaica | 8.566 USD | |
58 | Sri Lanka | 7.973 USD | |
59 | Thailand | 7.399 USD | |
60 | Peru | 6.692 USD | |
61 | Philippines | 6.543 USD | |
62 | Pakistan | 5.994 USD | |
63 | Indonesia | 4.908 USD | |
64 | China | 4.038 USD | |
65 | Vietnam | 2.736 USD | |
66 | India | 2.629 USD | |
67 | Bangladesh | 2.25 USD | |
68 | Cambodia | 1.402 USD | |
69 | Myanmar | 1.293 USD |
- #1
Norway
- #2
Luxembourg
- #3
Netherlands
- #4
Belgium
- #5
France
- #6
United Kingdom
- #7
Sweden
- #8
United States
- #9
Germany
- #10
Ireland
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #69
Myanmar
- #68
Cambodia
- #67
Bangladesh
- #66
India
- #65
Vietnam
- #64
China
- #63
Indonesia
- #62
Pakistan
- #61
Philippines
- #60
Peru
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Insights by country
Cyprus
In 2002, Cyprus achieved a global rank of #24 with a Labor Productivity Output of 41.2168 USD. This figure positioned Cyprus well above the global average, indicating a robust economic performance relative to many countries. Key drivers of this productivity included a well-developed service sector, particularly in tourism and finance, alongside a skilled labor force supported by a strong education system.
Trinidad and Tobago
In 2002, Trinidad and Tobago achieved a global rank of #38 with a Labor Productivity Output of 24.674236 USD. This figure is notably higher than the regional average for Caribbean nations, which often struggle with lower productivity levels. Key drivers of this productivity include the country's rich natural resources, particularly in oil and gas, which have historically fueled economic growth and investment in infrastructure.
Switzerland
In 2002, Switzerland achieved a global rank of #14 with a Labor Productivity Output of 55.72206 USD. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Switzerland's robust economic environment and highly skilled workforce. Key drivers include the country's strong emphasis on innovation, a well-established financial sector, and a commitment to high-quality education and training.
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka ranked #58 for Labor Productivity Output in 2002, with a value of 7.9734735 USD. This figure places Sri Lanka below many of its regional peers, reflecting challenges in economic diversification and workforce skills compared to higher-ranked countries. Key drivers of this productivity level include the country's reliance on agriculture and textiles, sectors that often face constraints in technology adoption and labor efficiency.
Jamaica
In 2002, Jamaica ranked #57 globally in Labor Productivity Output with a value of 8.566368 USD. This figure is notably lower than the average productivity levels in the Caribbean region, indicating challenges in economic efficiency. Contributing factors to Jamaica's labor productivity include a reliance on tourism and agriculture, which often offer lower wages and limited technological advancement compared to more industrialized nations.
Ecuador
In 2002, Ecuador had a Labor Productivity Output of 8.94394 USD, ranking #56 out of 69 countries. This figure is notably lower than many of its Latin American neighbors, reflecting challenges in economic diversification and investment in human capital. Key drivers of this productivity level include a reliance on primary sector exports, such as oil and agriculture, and limited access to advanced technology and training for the workforce.
Latvia
In 2002, Latvia ranked #43 globally with a Labor Productivity Output of 20.475597 USD. This figure is notably lower than the top-ranked country, Luxembourg, which highlights the challenges faced by Latvia's economy. Key drivers of this output include a transition from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented one, along with significant foreign investment aimed at modernizing its industries.
Australia
In 2002, Australia ranked #15 globally with a Labor Productivity Output of 55.343575 USD. This figure positions Australia above the global average, reflecting a strong economic performance compared to many neighboring countries. Key drivers of this productivity include Australia's advanced service sector, significant investments in technology, and a skilled workforce, all contributing to efficient output levels.
Bangladesh
In 2002, Bangladesh ranked #67 globally for Labor Productivity Output, with a value of 2.2502403 USD. This figure is notably low compared to neighboring India, which had a significantly higher productivity output during the same period. Contributing factors to this low productivity include a large informal labor market and challenges in infrastructure, which hinder efficient production processes.
Dominican Republic
In 2002, the Dominican Republic ranked #50 globally with a Labor Productivity Output of 13.081678 USD. This figure is notably lower than the top-ranked country, which demonstrates the challenges faced in enhancing productivity levels. Key drivers of this statistic include a reliance on tourism and agriculture, sectors that often provide lower productivity compared to manufacturing and technology-driven industries.
Analysis & Context
In 2002, Norway led the world in Labor Productivity Output with a remarkable figure of 87.46 USD per hour worked, while the global range spanned from a low of 1.29 USD to a high of 87.46 USD. This metric, calculated across 69 countries, averaged at 31.31 USD, providing a snapshot of economic efficiency worldwide.
Economic Efficiency and High Productivity Nations
The top performers in Labor Productivity Output for 2002 were predominantly European countries, with Luxembourg and the Netherlands following Norway at 71.85 USD and 66.05 USD per hour worked, respectively. These countries benefit from advanced economic structures, high levels of technology integration, and strong institutional frameworks that support efficient production processes. For instance, Luxembourg's financial services sector contributes significantly to its high productivity, while the Netherlands benefits from a robust logistics and trade infrastructure. The presence of the United States in the top ten, with a productivity output of 61.88 USD, underscores the role of innovation and scale in enhancing productivity.
Low Productivity and Development Challenges
At the other end of the spectrum, countries like Myanmar and Cambodia reported the lowest labor productivity outputs, with figures of 1.29 USD and 1.40 USD respectively. These low figures are often attributed to several factors, including limited access to technology, lower levels of education, and a reliance on agriculture and low-value industries. For example, Bangladesh and India, with outputs of 2.25 USD and 2.63 USD, highlight the challenges faced by densely populated countries trying to transition from agrarian economies to more industrialized ones.
Year-over-Year Changes and Economic Dynamics
Analyzing year-over-year changes in Labor Productivity Output reveals significant movements. Ireland experienced the largest increase, rising by 6.68 USD (12.5%), which can be attributed to its growing technology and pharmaceutical sectors. Conversely, Norway saw a decrease of 2.41 USD (-2.7%), reflecting potential fluctuations in its oil-dependent economy. Similarly, Argentina faced a decline of 1.96 USD (-8.7%) amidst economic instability, highlighting how macroeconomic factors and policy decisions can impact productivity.
Influence of Policy and Economic Structure
The disparities in labor productivity output across countries can often be linked to specific economic policies and structural characteristics. In high-output countries, policies promoting innovation, education, and infrastructure development have been pivotal. For instance, France and Germany, with outputs of 63.59 USD and 60.35 USD respectively, benefit from comprehensive industrial policies and skilled labor forces. In contrast, countries with lower productivity often grapple with policy challenges, such as India's efforts to reform labor laws and improve industrial relations.
The 2002 data on Labor Productivity Output not only reflects the economic efficiency of nations but also underscores the importance of strategic policy-making and investment in technology and human capital. The stark contrasts between countries highlight the diverse economic landscapes and the varying stages of development and industrialization across the globe.
Frequently Asked Questions About Labor Productivity Output in 2002
Which country had the highest labor productivity output in 2002?
Norway had the highest labor productivity output in 2002, with 87.46 USD per hour worked.
Which country had the lowest labor productivity output in 2002?
Myanmar had the lowest labor productivity output in 2002, with 1.29 USD per hour worked.
What was the average labor productivity output across all countries in 2002?
The average labor productivity output across all 69 countries in 2002 was 31.31 USD per hour worked.
What was the median labor productivity output in 2002?
The median labor productivity output in 2002 was 26.68 USD per hour worked.
Which countries were in the top 10 for labor productivity output in 2002?
The top 10 countries for labor productivity output in 2002 were Norway, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Belgium, France, United Kingdom, Sweden, United States, Germany, and Ireland.
What was the range of labor productivity output in 2002?
The range of labor productivity output in 2002 spanned from Myanmar's 1.29 USD to Norway's 87.46 USD per hour worked.
Data Source
Productivity: output per hour worked | Feenstra et al. – Penn World Table via Our World in Data
Data produced by Feenstra et al. – Penn World Table, compiled and published by Our World in Data as "Productivity: output per hour worked".
Visit Data SourceCite this page
Geo Factbook. (n.d.). Labor Productivity Output by Country, 2002. Retrieved November 13, 2026, from https://geofactbook.com/fact/labor-productivity-output/2002
The figures on this page come from Productivity: output per hour worked | Feenstra et al. – Penn World Table via Our World in Data. For academic work, cite the original source as well.
›Embed this ranking on your site
Free to embed with attribution. Shows the top 10 countries and links back to the full ranking.