Internet Usage Rate by Country (% of Population) 2003
Discover the internet usage rate by country, showcasing the percentage of the population online. This statistic highlights digital accessibility and connectivity trends globally, emphasizing the importance of internet access in today's world.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 64.2 % |
2 | Bermuda | 56.522 % |
3 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 52.2 % |
4 | Belgium | 49.97 % |
5 | Austria | 42.7 % |
6 | Barbados | 39.69 % |
7 | Czech Republic | 34.3 % |
8 | Cyprus | 30.09 % |
9 | China, Macao SAR | 25.742 % |
10 | Chile | 25.474 % |
11 | Croatia | 22.75 % |
12 | Bahrain | 21.555 % |
13 | Aruba | 20.8 % |
14 | Costa Rica | 20.334 % |
15 | Bahamas | 20 % |
16 | Brunei Darussalam | 19.595 % |
17 | Antigua and Barbuda | 17.229 % |
18 | Andorra | 13.546 % |
19 | Brazil | 13.208 % |
20 | Bulgaria | 12.04 % |
21 | Argentina | 11.914 % |
22 | Colombia | 7.389 % |
23 | China | 6.2 % |
24 | Cuba | 5.241 % |
25 | Armenia | 4.575 % |
26 | Cabo Verde | 4.325 % |
27 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3.965 % |
28 | Bolivia | 3.509 % |
29 | Botswana | 3.345 % |
30 | Bhutan | 2.437 % |
31 | Algeria | 2.195 % |
32 | Albania | 0.972 % |
33 | Benin | 0.951 % |
34 | Comoros | 0.848 % |
35 | Côte d'Ivoire | 0.759 % |
36 | Cameroon | 0.588 % |
37 | Congo | 0.46 % |
38 | Burkina Faso | 0.373 % |
39 | Angola | 0.371 % |
40 | Chad | 0.32 % |
41 | Cambodia | 0.261 % |
42 | Burundi | 0.201 % |
43 | Bangladesh | 0.164 % |
44 | Afghanistan | 0.088 % |
45 | Australia | NaN % |
46 | Azerbaijan | NaN % |
47 | Belarus | NaN % |
48 | Belize | NaN % |
49 | British Virgin Islands | NaN % |
50 | Cayman Islands | NaN % |
51 | Central African Republic | 0.152 % |
52 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 0.135 % |
53 | Curaçao | NaN % |
54 | Iceland | 83.14 % |
55 | Denmark | 76.26 % |
56 | Finland | 69.22 % |
57 | Faroe Islands | 58.913 % |
58 | Germany | 55.9 % |
59 | Greenland | 54.534 % |
60 | Japan | 48.435 % |
61 | Estonia | 45.32 % |
62 | France | 36.14 % |
63 | Ireland | 34.31 % |
64 | Guam | 33.717 % |
65 | Italy | 29.04 % |
66 | Gibraltar | 28.326 % |
67 | Latvia | 26.98 % |
68 | Dominica | 23.62 % |
69 | Kuwait | 22.403 % |
70 | Hungary | 21.63 % |
71 | Israel | 19.593 % |
72 | Grenada | 18.645 % |
73 | Greece | 17.8 % |
74 | French Polynesia | 14.124 % |
75 | Jordan | 8.466 % |
76 | Dominican Republic | 7.898 % |
77 | Jamaica | 7.8 % |
78 | Iran | 6.934 % |
79 | Fiji | 6.725 % |
80 | Honduras | 4.8 % |
81 | Guatemala | 4.549 % |
82 | Ecuador | 4.46 % |
83 | Egypt | 4.038 % |
84 | Kyrgyzstan | 3.909 % |
85 | Kiribati | 3 % |
86 | Kenya | 2.942 % |
87 | Gabon | 2.66 % |
88 | Georgia | 2.559 % |
89 | El Salvador | 2.5 % |
90 | Eswatini | 2.437 % |
91 | Gambia | 2.437 % |
92 | Guyana | 2.4 % |
93 | Indonesia | 2.387 % |
94 | Kazakhstan | 2 % |
95 | India | 1.686 % |
96 | Guinea-Bissau | 1.354 % |
97 | Djibouti | 0.626 % |
98 | Equatorial Guinea | 0.521 % |
99 | Eritrea | NaN % |
100 | Haiti | 1.647 % |
101 | Ghana | 1.193 % |
102 | Iraq | 0.6 % |
103 | Guinea | 0.451 % |
104 | Ethiopia | 0.106 % |
105 | Kosovo | NaN % |
106 | Norway | 78.13 % |
107 | Netherlands | 64.35 % |
108 | New Zealand | 60.963 % |
109 | Liechtenstein | 58.81 % |
110 | Luxembourg | 54.55 % |
111 | Monaco | 49.491 % |
112 | Malaysia | 34.971 % |
113 | Malta | 31.64 % |
114 | Portugal | 29.67 % |
115 | New Caledonia | 26.408 % |
116 | Lithuania | 25.91 % |
117 | Poland | 24.87 % |
118 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 22.97 % |
119 | Palau | 21.602 % |
120 | Puerto Rico | 19.707 % |
121 | Qatar | 19.242 % |
122 | North Macedonia | 19.07 % |
123 | Mexico | 12.9 % |
124 | Mauritius | 12.187 % |
125 | Peru | 11.6 % |
126 | Panama | 9.987 % |
127 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 9.233 % |
128 | Romania | 8.9 % |
129 | Russia | 8.299 % |
130 | Lebanon | 8 % |
131 | Republic of Moldova | 7.408 % |
132 | Oman | 7.256 % |
133 | Maldives | 5.977 % |
134 | Pakistan | 5.041 % |
135 | Philippines | 4.858 % |
136 | Namibia | 3.36 % |
137 | Morocco | 3.353 % |
138 | Libya | 2.815 % |
139 | Marshall Islands | 2.57 % |
140 | Paraguay | 2.112 % |
141 | Nicaragua | 1.88 % |
142 | Lesotho | 1.533 % |
143 | Papua New Guinea | 1.374 % |
144 | Nigeria | 0.559 % |
145 | Mauritania | 0.424 % |
146 | Madagascar | 0.423 % |
147 | Mozambique | 0.42 % |
148 | Nepal | 0.383 % |
149 | Mali | 0.31 % |
150 | Malawi | 0.279 % |
151 | Liberia | 0.032 % |
152 | Mongolia | NaN % |
153 | Montenegro | NaN % |
154 | Rwanda | 0.357 % |
155 | Niger | 0.156 % |
156 | Myanmar | 0.024 % |
157 | Nauru | NaN % |
158 | Sweden | 79.13 % |
159 | South Korea | 65.5 % |
160 | Switzerland | 65.1 % |
161 | United Kingdom | 64.82 % |
162 | United States | 61.697 % |
163 | Singapore | 53.838 % |
164 | San Marino | 50.004 % |
165 | Slovakia | 43.04 % |
166 | Spain | 39.93 % |
167 | Slovenia | 31.855 % |
168 | United Arab Emirates | 29.478 % |
169 | United States Virgin Islands | 27.429 % |
170 | Trinidad and Tobago | 25.972 % |
171 | Saint Lucia | 20.983 % |
172 | Uruguay | 15.937 % |
173 | Seychelles | 14.593 % |
174 | Turkey | 12.33 % |
175 | Sao Tome and Principe | 10.162 % |
176 | Thailand | 9.299 % |
177 | Saudi Arabia | 8.002 % |
178 | Venezuela | 7.5 % |
179 | Tuvalu | 6.9 % |
180 | Tunisia | 6.491 % |
181 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 6.462 % |
182 | Suriname | 4.72 % |
183 | Ukraine | 3.148 % |
184 | Tonga | 2.986 % |
185 | Samoa | 2.8 % |
186 | Senegal | 2.101 % |
187 | Serbia | NaN % |
188 | South Africa | 7.008 % |
189 | State of Palestine | 4.131 % |
190 | Vanuatu | 3.903 % |
191 | Vietnam | 3.78 % |
192 | Syrian Arab Republic | 3.398 % |
193 | Uzbekistan | 1.913 % |
194 | Zimbabwe | 1.8 % |
195 | Sri Lanka | 1.459 % |
196 | Togo | 1.2 % |
197 | Zambia | 0.98 % |
198 | Tanzania | 0.677 % |
199 | Yemen | 0.605 % |
200 | Solomon Islands | 0.556 % |
201 | Sudan | 0.538 % |
202 | Uganda | 0.465 % |
203 | Turkmenistan | 0.425 % |
204 | Somalia | 0.376 % |
205 | Laos | 0.334 % |
206 | Sierra Leone | 0.19 % |
207 | South Sudan | NaN % |
208 | Tajikistan | 0.065 % |
209 | North Korea | 0 % |
210 | Timor-Leste | NaN % |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Canada
- #2
Bermuda
- #3
China, Hong Kong SAR
- #4
Belgium
- #5
Austria
- #6
Barbados
- #7
Czech Republic
- #8
Cyprus
- #9
China, Macao SAR
- #10
Chile
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #210
Timor-Leste
- #209
North Korea
- #208
Tajikistan
- #207
South Sudan
- #206
Sierra Leone
- #205
Laos
- #204
Somalia
- #203
Turkmenistan
- #202
Uganda
- #201
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The global landscape of the Internet in 2003 marked a pivotal moment in digital connectivity, with the "Internet Usage Rate by Country (% of Population)" providing insight into how different nations embraced the digital age. This statistic serves as a barometer for digital accessibility, highlighting both progress and challenges. In this year, the data reflected significant disparities in internet access among countries, underlining the digital divide that was prevalent at the time.
Global Leaders in Connectivity
In 2003, several countries stood out for their high internet usage rates, showcasing their advanced digital infrastructure. Iceland led the world with a remarkable 83.14% of its population online, followed closely by Sweden at 79.13% and Norway at 78.13%. These figures underscore the strong emphasis on technology and connectivity in Nordic countries, which have consistently prioritized digital innovation and investment. The high penetration rates in these nations were driven by government policies supporting universal internet access, robust telecommunications infrastructure, and a tech-savvy population eager to embrace the digital world.
Regional Disparities in Internet Access
While some countries were at the forefront of internet adoption, others lagged significantly. The data revealed stark contrasts, with North Korea, Myanmar, and Liberia reporting some of the lowest internet usage rates, ranging from 0% to 0.031%. These figures highlight the ongoing challenges in developing adequate internet infrastructure and addressing political or economic barriers. The lack of internet access in these regions can be attributed to factors such as limited telecommunications infrastructure, regulatory restrictions, and economic constraints. Such disparities emphasize the need for targeted policies to bridge the digital divide and promote inclusive digital growth.
Growth Trends and Innovations
The year 2003 also saw significant year-over-year changes in internet usage across various countries. Spain experienced the largest increase, with a remarkable growth of 19.54 percentage points, reflecting a 95.8% surge in internet adoption. Other notable increases were observed in Luxembourg and Kuwait, with growth rates of 36.9% and 118.6% respectively. These trends indicate a burgeoning interest in digital technologies driven by economic reforms, investments in telecommunication infrastructure, and cultural shifts towards connectivity. Such advancements were crucial in shaping the digital trajectories of these nations, positioning them for future growth in the information age.
The varying internet usage rates in 2003 also had profound economic and social implications. Countries with higher internet penetration, such as the United Kingdom (64.82%) and Canada (64.2%), were better positioned to leverage digital technologies for economic development, innovation, and competitive advantage. In these regions, the internet became a catalyst for new business models, enhancing productivity and creating new opportunities for employment and entrepreneurship. Conversely, countries with low internet usage faced challenges in participating in the global digital economy, which could hinder their economic growth and development.
Future Projections and Policy Implications
As the global community moved forward from 2003, the data on internet usage underscored the importance of strategic policy interventions to ensure equitable access to digital technologies. Countries with low penetration rates needed to prioritize investments in infrastructure, address regulatory barriers, and foster an inclusive digital environment. The burgeoning growth in internet usage in several countries suggested a positive trajectory, yet it also highlighted the need for continued focus on reducing disparities. Policymakers were tasked with promoting digital literacy, expanding connectivity to underserved areas, and fostering international cooperation to support a more connected and equitable global community.
The "Internet Usage Rate by Country (% of Population)" in 2003 provided a snapshot of a world at the cusp of digital transformation. As countries navigated this evolving landscape, their ability to harness the potential of the internet would play a crucial role in shaping their future economic and social development.
Insights by country
Liechtenstein
In 2003, Liechtenstein achieved an impressive Internet usage rate of 58.81%, ranking 14th out of 210 countries in terms of internet penetration among its population. This statistic reflects the country's early adoption of digital technologies and a strong infrastructure supporting internet access.
The relatively high internet usage rate can be attributed to several factors, including Liechtenstein's developed economy, high standard of living, and a strong emphasis on education and technology. The small size of the country also allows for quicker implementation of technological advancements compared to larger nations.
Moreover, the government of Liechtenstein has historically encouraged digital innovation and investment in telecommunications, facilitating broader access to the internet. As of 2003, this trend was indicative of the nation's commitment to integrating modern technology into everyday life, laying the groundwork for further growth in internet usage in subsequent years.
Cameroon
In 2003, Cameroon had an internet usage rate of 0.587623%, ranking 162 out of 210 countries in terms of the percentage of its population using the internet. This low rate reflects the country's limited technological infrastructure and access to digital resources at the time.
Several factors contributed to this statistic, including a lack of widespread telecommunications networks, high costs associated with internet access, and limited digital literacy among the population. Additionally, economic challenges and a focus on more pressing social issues likely impeded the growth of internet usage.
Interestingly, by comparison, many countries in the region were also experiencing low internet penetration rates during this period, highlighting a broader trend in Sub-Saharan Africa. As of 2023, internet usage has significantly increased across the continent, illustrating the rapid technological advancements and investments in infrastructure over the past two decades.
Georgia
In 2003, Georgia had an internet usage rate of 2.56% of its population, ranking 131 out of 210 countries in terms of internet penetration. This low percentage reflects the country's ongoing challenges in telecommunications infrastructure and broader socio-economic factors following the turbulent political and economic landscape of the early 2000s.
The limited access to the internet during this period can be attributed to several factors, including the aftermath of the civil conflicts in the 1990s, which hampered the development of necessary technological infrastructure. Additionally, economic constraints and a relatively low level of digital literacy among the population further impeded widespread internet adoption.
As a point of comparison, the global average internet usage rate in the early 2000s was significantly higher, indicating that many countries had already begun to experience the benefits of digital connectivity. Over the subsequent years, however, Georgia made notable advancements in improving its internet infrastructure, contributing to a steady increase in usage rates.
Chad
In 2003, Chad ranked 180 out of 210 countries in terms of internet usage, with an estimated 0.320309% of its population having access to the internet. This low percentage reflects the country’s underdeveloped telecommunications infrastructure and limited access to modern technology.
Factors contributing to this low internet usage rate include high levels of poverty, a lack of investment in technological development, and geographical challenges that hinder the establishment of internet connectivity. Additionally, political instability and social issues have further impeded efforts to expand internet access.
During this period, Chad faced significant challenges in bridging the digital divide, which has implications for education, economic development, and access to information. The global trend toward increasing internet penetration highlights the disparities faced by countries like Chad in achieving connectivity.
El Salvador
In 2003, El Salvador ranked 132nd out of 210 countries in terms of internet usage, with a rate of only 2.5% of the population having access to the internet. This low percentage reflects the country's early stage of internet adoption, which was influenced by various factors including limited infrastructure, economic constraints, and a lack of digital literacy.
The relatively low internet usage can be attributed to the country's economic situation at the time, where a significant portion of the population lived below the poverty line, making it challenging for many to afford internet access. Additionally, rural areas were particularly underserved in terms of telecommunications infrastructure, further exacerbating the digital divide.
As a point of comparison, global internet usage was rapidly increasing during this period, driven by technological advancements and decreasing costs of internet services. By contrast, El Salvador's internet penetration was significantly lower than many of its regional neighbors, highlighting the challenges the country faced in bridging the digital gap.
Zimbabwe
In 2003, Zimbabwe had an internet usage rate of 1.8% of its population, ranking 144th out of 210 countries. This low percentage reflects significant barriers to internet access, including limited infrastructure, high costs of connectivity, and economic challenges faced by the country during a period of political instability.
The underdeveloped telecommunications sector, coupled with a lack of investment in technology, contributed to Zimbabwe's relatively low internet penetration at the time. Additionally, widespread economic hardships and hyperinflation limited the ability of citizens to afford internet services or devices.
As a point of reference, the global average internet penetration was rapidly increasing during this period, highlighting the disparities in digital access between Zimbabwe and many other nations. The situation in Zimbabwe exemplifies the broader issues of digital divide and access to information technology in developing regions.
Qatar
In 2003, Qatar had an internet usage rate of 19.24%, ranking 64th out of 210 countries in terms of internet penetration. This statistic reflects the country's early stages of digital adoption, as it was beginning to invest in telecommunications infrastructure and technology education.
The relatively low percentage of internet users during this period can be attributed to several factors, including the nascent state of technological development, limited accessibility in rural areas, and a smaller population base. Despite these challenges, Qatar's government initiated various initiatives aimed at enhancing digital connectivity, which would later lead to significant growth in internet usage.
By 2023, Qatar has become one of the leaders in the region regarding internet connectivity and digital services, showcasing a remarkable transformation from its early 21st-century status. This evolution reflects broader global trends towards increasing internet accessibility and the pivotal role of technology in economic development.
Ireland
In 2003, Ireland ranked 32nd out of 210 countries in terms of internet usage, with a rate of 34.31% of its population accessing the internet. This figure reflects the significant growth of internet accessibility in Ireland during the early 2000s, as the country was undergoing a technological transformation.
Several factors contributed to this statistic, including the expansion of telecommunications infrastructure, increasing affordability of personal computers, and a burgeoning interest in digital technologies among the Irish population. The government also played a role through initiatives aimed at enhancing information and communication technology (ICT) in education and public services.
Interestingly, by the mid-2000s, Ireland was recognized as one of the fastest-growing economies in the European Union, often referred to as the "Celtic Tiger," which further accelerated technological adoption and internet penetration in subsequent years.
Mozambique
In 2003, Mozambique ranked 173rd out of 210 countries in terms of internet usage, with an internet penetration rate of only 0.42% of the population. This low figure reflects the country's limited access to technology and infrastructure, significantly affecting the ability of its citizens to connect to the internet.
The minimal internet usage rate in Mozambique can be attributed to several factors, including economic challenges, insufficient telecommunications infrastructure, and high levels of poverty. Many areas, especially rural regions, lacked the necessary resources to support internet connectivity, and the cost of accessing technology was prohibitively high for the majority of the population.
Furthermore, the early 2000s saw Mozambique recovering from years of civil conflict, which had devastated its infrastructure and hindered development. In comparison, countries with higher internet penetration rates during this period often had more robust economies and established technological frameworks, highlighting the disparities in global digital access.
Madagascar
In 2003, Madagascar ranked 172nd out of 210 countries in terms of Internet usage rate, with only 0.423252% of its population having access to the Internet. This low percentage reflects the significant challenges faced by the nation in terms of telecommunications infrastructure and economic development.
The limited Internet penetration can be attributed to various factors, including high poverty levels, inadequate infrastructure, and a lack of investment in technology. Furthermore, Madagascar's geographic isolation as an island nation complicates the logistics of establishing widespread connectivity.
As a point of reference, the global average Internet usage rate in 2003 was substantially higher, indicating that many countries were already experiencing the benefits of digital connectivity. The growth of the Internet in Madagascar has since been a focus of development initiatives aimed at enhancing accessibility and promoting economic opportunities.
Data Source
International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
ITU is the United Nations specialized agency for digital technologies (ICTs). The Organization is made up of a membership of 194 Member States and more than 1000 companies, universities and international and regional organizations. Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, and with regional offices on every continent, ITU is the oldest agency in the UN family – has been connecting people for over 160 years.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Internet Usage Rate by Country (% of Population) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Communications Facts
Press Freedom Index Score
The Press Freedom Index Score measures the level of media freedom in countries worldwide. A higher score indicates stronger press independence, essential for democracy and transparency. Understanding these scores helps highlight the importance of free expression in society.
View dataBrowse All Communications
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data