Dentist Density 2014
Dentist density measures the number of dentists per 10,000 people, indicating healthcare access.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Greece | 12.6 per 10,000 people | |
2 | Monaco | 10.5 per 10,000 people | |
3 | Bulgaria | 10 per 10,000 people | |
4 | Estonia | 9.3 per 10,000 people | |
5 | Lithuania | 9.1 per 10,000 people | |
6 | North Macedonia | 8.8 per 10,000 people | |
7 | Portugal | 8.8 per 10,000 people | |
8 | Norway | 8.7 per 10,000 people | |
9 | Luxembourg | 8.6 per 10,000 people | |
10 | Germany | 8.5 per 10,000 people | |
11 | Iceland | 8.4 per 10,000 people | |
12 | Andorra | 8.3 per 10,000 people | |
13 | Sweden | 8.2 per 10,000 people | |
14 | Israel | 8 per 10,000 people | |
15 | Croatia | 7.9 per 10,000 people | |
16 | Italy | 7.8 per 10,000 people | |
17 | Denmark | 7.7 per 10,000 people | |
18 | Czech Republic | 7.5 per 10,000 people | |
19 | Romania | 7.4 per 10,000 people | |
20 | Finland | 7.3 per 10,000 people | |
21 | Belgium | 7.2 per 10,000 people | |
22 | Spain | 7.1 per 10,000 people | |
23 | Cyprus | 7 per 10,000 people | |
24 | Latvia | 7 per 10,000 people | |
25 | Slovenia | 6.6 per 10,000 people | |
26 | France | 6.5 per 10,000 people | |
27 | San Marino | 6.5 per 10,000 people | |
28 | Hungary | 6.3 per 10,000 people | |
29 | Canada | 6.2 per 10,000 people | |
30 | Austria | 6 per 10,000 people | |
31 | United States | 6 per 10,000 people | |
32 | Ireland | 5.9 per 10,000 people | |
33 | Ukraine | 5.9 per 10,000 people | |
34 | Belarus | 5.7 per 10,000 people | |
35 | Georgia | 5.7 per 10,000 people | |
36 | Republic of Moldova | 5.3 per 10,000 people | |
37 | United Kingdom | 5.3 per 10,000 people | |
38 | Switzerland | 5.1 per 10,000 people | |
39 | Netherlands | 4.9 per 10,000 people | |
40 | Slovakia | 4.9 per 10,000 people | |
41 | Malta | 4.6 per 10,000 people | |
42 | Armenia | 3.9 per 10,000 people | |
43 | Kazakhstan | 3.6 per 10,000 people | |
44 | Poland | 3.4 per 10,000 people | |
45 | Serbia | 3.2 per 10,000 people | |
46 | Turkey | 3 per 10,000 people | |
47 | Azerbaijan | 2.7 per 10,000 people | |
48 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2.3 per 10,000 people | |
49 | Kyrgyzstan | 1.6 per 10,000 people | |
50 | Uzbekistan | 1.6 per 10,000 people | |
51 | Tajikistan | 1.4 per 10,000 people | |
52 | Turkmenistan | 1 per 10,000 people | |
53 | Montenegro | 0.4 per 10,000 people |
- #1
Greece
- #2
Monaco
- #3
Bulgaria
- #4
Estonia
- #5
Lithuania
- #6
North Macedonia
- #7
Portugal
- #8
Norway
- #9
Luxembourg
- #10
Germany
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #53
Montenegro
- #52
Turkmenistan
- #51
Tajikistan
- #50
Uzbekistan
- #49
Kyrgyzstan
- #48
Bosnia and Herzegovina
- #47
Azerbaijan
- #46
Turkey
- #45
Serbia
- #44
Poland
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2014, Greece led the world in Dentist Density with a rate of 12.6 dentists per 10,000 people, while Montenegro had the lowest at 0.40. Globally, the range of dentist density spanned from 0.40 to 12.60, with an average of 6.17 dentists per 10,000 people. This metric highlights disparities in healthcare access across different countries.
Economic Factors Influencing Dentist Density
Countries with higher dentist densities, such as Greece (12.6), Monaco (10.5), and Bulgaria (10), often correlate with higher economic development and urbanization. These nations typically have the resources to support extensive healthcare infrastructure, including dental services. In contrast, countries like Montenegro (0.4) and Turkmenistan (1) reflect lower dentist densities that can be attributed to limited healthcare budgets and less urbanized areas. These economic constraints hinder the expansion of dental services, impacting overall healthcare access.
Geographic and Demographic Patterns
Geographic and demographic factors also play a critical role in determining dentist density. For instance, smaller European nations like Monaco (10.5) and Estonia (9.3) benefit from compact urban centers, where healthcare services, including dentistry, are more accessible. Conversely, larger or more rural countries, such as Uzbekistan (1.6) and Kyrgyzstan (1.6), face challenges in providing widespread dental coverage due to their expansive territories and dispersed populations.
Policy Impacts and Healthcare Prioritization
National healthcare policies significantly impact dentist density. Countries like Portugal (8.8) and Norway (8.7) have robust public healthcare systems that prioritize dental care, leading to higher dentist densities. On the other hand, nations such as Turkey (3) and Serbia (3.2) may not prioritize dental care within their public health policies, resulting in lower densities. These policy choices reflect differing national priorities and resource allocations within healthcare systems.
Year-over-Year Trends and Changes
The year-over-year changes in dentist density reveal significant shifts in certain countries. Israel experienced the most substantial increase with a rise of 1.00 (14.3%), reflecting potential improvements in healthcare infrastructure or policy changes that favor dental care. Similarly, Andorra saw an increase of 0.80 (10.7%), signaling positive developments in its healthcare system. In contrast, Ukraine experienced a notable decrease of 0.80 (-11.9%), possibly due to economic or political challenges affecting healthcare services. These trends highlight how external factors can influence healthcare access and priorities over time.
Conclusion
The disparity in Dentist Density across countries in 2014 underscores the influence of economic, geographic, and policy factors on healthcare access. Countries with higher densities tend to have better-developed healthcare systems and urban infrastructure, whereas those with lower densities face economic and logistical challenges. The year-over-year changes further illustrate how dynamic and responsive healthcare metrics can be to external pressures and policy shifts. Understanding these patterns is crucial for addressing global healthcare inequalities and improving access to dental care worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Dentist Density in 2014
Which country had the highest dentist density in 2014?
Greece had the highest dentist density in 2014, with 12.6 dentists per 10,000 people.
Which country had the lowest dentist density in 2014?
Montenegro had the lowest dentist density in 2014, with 0.4 dentists per 10,000 people.
What was the average dentist density across countries in 2014?
The average dentist density across the 53 countries in 2014 was 6.17 dentists per 10,000 people.
What was the median dentist density in 2014?
The median dentist density in 2014 was 6.5 dentists per 10,000 people.
Which countries were in the top 3 for dentist density in 2014?
The top 3 countries for dentist density in 2014 were Greece with 12.6, Monaco with 10.5, and Bulgaria with 10 dentists per 10,000 people.
What is the range of dentist density values in 2014?
The range of dentist density values in 2014 was from 0.4 dentists per 10,000 people in Montenegro to 12.6 in Greece.
Insights by country
Armenia
In 2014, Armenia had a Dentist Density of 3.9 per 10,000 people, ranking #42 out of 53 countries. This figure is lower than the global average, indicating a relative shortage of dental professionals compared to many nations. Contributing factors include Armenia's economic challenges and a smaller healthcare sector, which can limit access to dental care for its population.
Turkey
In 2014, Turkey had a dentist density of 3 per 10,000 people, ranking #46 out of 53 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating a relative scarcity of dental professionals in the country. Contributing factors include a growing population that may outpace the training and distribution of dentists, as well as economic challenges that limit access to dental care in certain regions.
Bulgaria
In 2014, Bulgaria achieved a global rank of #3 with a dentist density of 10 per 10,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the regional average in Eastern Europe, indicating a strong healthcare infrastructure. Contributing factors include Bulgaria's emphasis on dental education and training, resulting in a well-distributed workforce, as well as a growing dental tourism sector that attracts patients from neighboring countries.
Germany
In 2014, Germany achieved a global rank of #10 with a Dentist Density of 8.5 per 10,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the European average, reflecting the country's robust healthcare system and emphasis on preventive care. Contributing factors include Germany's strong economy, which supports extensive healthcare access, and a well-established educational framework for dental professionals.
Kazakhstan
In 2014, Kazakhstan had a Dentist Density of 3.6 per 10,000 people, ranking #43 out of 53 countries. This figure is below the global average, indicating a relative shortage of dental professionals compared to higher-ranked countries. Contributing factors include the country's vast geographic expanse, which complicates access to dental care, and a healthcare system that has historically faced challenges in rural areas, impacting the distribution of dentists.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranked #48 globally in 2014 for Dentist Density, with a value of 2.3 per 10,000 people. This figure is notably lower than the regional average, reflecting challenges in healthcare access compared to neighboring countries like Croatia, which has a higher density of dental professionals. Contributing factors include the country's post-war economic struggles and a healthcare system that has not fully developed to meet the population's needs.
Switzerland
In 2014, Switzerland ranked #38 globally with a Dentist Density of 5.1 per 10,000 people. This figure is relatively low compared to neighboring countries like Germany, which has a higher dentist density. Contributing factors to this statistic include Switzerland's high standard of living and healthcare access, which encourages preventive dental care, but also a smaller population size that may limit the number of practicing dentists.
Georgia
In 2014, Georgia had a Dentist Density of 5.7 per 10,000 people, ranking #35 out of 53 countries. This figure is relatively low compared to the European average, which tends to be higher due to more established healthcare systems. The dentist density in Georgia is influenced by its economic transition post-Soviet Union, which has affected healthcare accessibility and the distribution of dental professionals across the country.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan ranked #47 globally in 2014 for Dentist Density, with a value of 2.7 per 10,000 people. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare access compared to higher-ranked countries. Factors contributing to this statistic include economic constraints and a healthcare system that is still developing, which affects the availability of dental professionals in urban and rural areas alike.
Serbia
In 2014, Serbia had a Dentist Density of 3.2 per 10,000 people, ranking #45 out of 53 countries. This figure is notably lower than many European nations, indicating a potential gap in dental healthcare access compared to regional averages. Contributing factors include Serbia's economic challenges and a healthcare system that has historically been underfunded, impacting the availability of dental professionals.
Data Source
Density of dentists - Sustainable Development Goals - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) provides data on the density of dentists as part of its Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) indicators, offering country-level statistics that reflect the availability of dental healthcare professionals. This dataset aids in assessing healthcare access and quality across member states.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dentist Density data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.