Corruption Perception Index 2020
Corruption Perception Index ranks countries by perceived corruption levels. It influences investment decisions.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 88 index | |
2 | New Zealand | 88 index | |
3 | Finland | 85 index | |
4 | Singapore | 85 index | |
5 | Sweden | 85 index | |
6 | Switzerland | 85 index | |
7 | Norway | 84 index | |
8 | Netherlands | 82 index | |
9 | Germany | 80 index | |
10 | Luxembourg | 80 index | |
11 | Australia | 77 index | |
12 | Canada | 77 index | |
13 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 77 index | |
14 | United Kingdom | 77 index | |
15 | Austria | 76 index | |
16 | Belgium | 76 index | |
17 | Estonia | 75 index | |
18 | Iceland | 75 index | |
19 | Japan | 74 index | |
20 | Ireland | 72 index | |
21 | United Arab Emirates | 71 index | |
22 | Uruguay | 71 index | |
23 | France | 69 index | |
24 | Bhutan | 68 index | |
25 | Chile | 67 index | |
26 | United States | 67 index | |
27 | Seychelles | 66 index | |
28 | Taiwan | 65 index | |
29 | Barbados | 64 index | |
30 | Bahamas | 63 index | |
31 | Qatar | 63 index | |
32 | Spain | 62 index | |
33 | Portugal | 61 index | |
34 | South Korea | 61 index | |
35 | Botswana | 60 index | |
36 | Brunei Darussalam | 60 index | |
37 | Israel | 60 index | |
38 | Lithuania | 60 index | |
39 | Slovenia | 60 index | |
40 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 59 index | |
41 | Cabo Verde | 58 index | |
42 | Costa Rica | 57 index | |
43 | Cyprus | 57 index | |
44 | Latvia | 57 index | |
45 | Georgia | 56 index | |
46 | Poland | 56 index | |
47 | Saint Lucia | 56 index | |
48 | Dominica | 55 index | |
49 | Czech Republic | 54 index | |
50 | Oman | 54 index | |
51 | Rwanda | 54 index | |
52 | Grenada | 53 index | |
53 | Italy | 53 index | |
54 | Malta | 53 index | |
55 | Mauritius | 53 index | |
56 | Saudi Arabia | 53 index | |
57 | Malaysia | 51 index | |
58 | Namibia | 51 index | |
59 | Greece | 50 index | |
60 | Armenia | 49 index | |
61 | Jordan | 49 index | |
62 | Slovakia | 49 index | |
63 | Belarus | 47 index | |
64 | Croatia | 47 index | |
65 | Cuba | 47 index | |
66 | Sao Tome and Principe | 47 index | |
67 | Montenegro | 45 index | |
68 | Senegal | 45 index | |
69 | Bulgaria | 44 index | |
70 | Hungary | 44 index | |
71 | Jamaica | 44 index | |
72 | Romania | 44 index | |
73 | South Africa | 44 index | |
74 | Tunisia | 44 index | |
75 | Ghana | 43 index | |
76 | Maldives | 43 index | |
77 | Vanuatu | 43 index | |
78 | Argentina | 42 index | |
79 | Bahrain | 42 index | |
80 | China | 42 index | |
81 | Kuwait | 42 index | |
82 | Solomon Islands | 42 index | |
83 | Benin | 41 index | |
84 | Guyana | 41 index | |
85 | Lesotho | 41 index | |
86 | Burkina Faso | 40 index | |
87 | Timor-Leste | 40 index | |
88 | India | 40 index | |
89 | Morocco | 40 index | |
90 | Trinidad and Tobago | 40 index | |
91 | Turkey | 40 index | |
92 | Colombia | 39 index | |
93 | Ecuador | 39 index | |
94 | Brazil | 38 index | |
95 | Ethiopia | 38 index | |
96 | Kazakhstan | 38 index | |
97 | Peru | 38 index | |
98 | Serbia | 38 index | |
99 | Sri Lanka | 38 index | |
100 | Suriname | 38 index | |
101 | Tanzania | 38 index | |
102 | Gambia | 37 index | |
103 | Indonesia | 37 index | |
104 | Albania | 36 index | |
105 | Algeria | 36 index | |
106 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 36 index | |
107 | El Salvador | 36 index | |
108 | Thailand | 36 index | |
109 | Vietnam | 36 index | |
110 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 35 index | |
111 | Mongolia | 35 index | |
112 | North Macedonia | 35 index | |
113 | Panama | 35 index | |
114 | Republic of Moldova | 34 index | |
115 | Philippines | 34 index | |
116 | Egypt | 33 index | |
117 | Eswatini | 33 index | |
118 | Nepal | 33 index | |
119 | Sierra Leone | 33 index | |
120 | Ukraine | 33 index | |
121 | Zambia | 33 index | |
122 | Niger | 32 index | |
123 | Bolivia | 31 index | |
124 | Kenya | 31 index | |
125 | Kyrgyzstan | 31 index | |
126 | Mexico | 31 index | |
127 | Pakistan | 31 index | |
128 | Azerbaijan | 30 index | |
129 | Gabon | 30 index | |
130 | Malawi | 30 index | |
131 | Mali | 30 index | |
132 | Russia | 30 index | |
133 | Laos | 29 index | |
134 | Mauritania | 29 index | |
135 | Togo | 29 index | |
136 | Dominican Republic | 28 index | |
137 | Guinea | 28 index | |
138 | Liberia | 28 index | |
139 | Myanmar | 28 index | |
140 | Paraguay | 28 index | |
141 | Angola | 27 index | |
142 | Djibouti | 27 index | |
143 | Papua New Guinea | 27 index | |
144 | Uganda | 27 index | |
145 | Bangladesh | 26 index | |
146 | Central African Republic | 26 index | |
147 | Uzbekistan | 26 index | |
148 | Cameroon | 25 index | |
149 | Guatemala | 25 index | |
150 | Iran | 25 index | |
151 | Lebanon | 25 index | |
152 | Madagascar | 25 index | |
153 | Mozambique | 25 index | |
154 | Nigeria | 25 index | |
155 | Tajikistan | 25 index | |
156 | Honduras | 24 index | |
157 | Zimbabwe | 24 index | |
158 | Nicaragua | 22 index | |
159 | Cambodia | 21 index | |
160 | Chad | 21 index | |
161 | Comoros | 21 index | |
162 | Eritrea | 21 index | |
163 | Iraq | 21 index | |
164 | Afghanistan | 19 index | |
165 | Burundi | 19 index | |
166 | Congo | 19 index | |
167 | Guinea-Bissau | 19 index | |
168 | Turkmenistan | 19 index | |
169 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 18 index | |
170 | Haiti | 18 index | |
171 | North Korea | 18 index | |
172 | Libya | 17 index | |
173 | Equatorial Guinea | 16 index | |
174 | Sudan | 16 index | |
175 | Venezuela | 15 index | |
176 | Yemen | 15 index | |
177 | Syrian Arab Republic | 14 index | |
178 | Somalia | 12 index | |
179 | South Sudan | 12 index |
- #1
Denmark
- #2
New Zealand
- #3
Finland
- #4
Singapore
- #5
Sweden
- #6
Switzerland
- #7
Norway
- #8
Netherlands
- #9
Germany
- #10
Luxembourg
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #179
South Sudan
- #178
Somalia
- #177
Syrian Arab Republic
- #176
Yemen
- #175
Venezuela
- #174
Sudan
- #173
Equatorial Guinea
- #172
Libya
- #171
North Korea
- #170
Haiti
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Corruption Perception Index 2020 identifies Denmark and New Zealand as the countries with the highest perceived integrity, each scoring 88 on the index. Conversely, the spectrum of global corruption perception spans from a high of 88 to a low of 12 in South Sudan and Somalia. The global average score for 2020 was 43.39, highlighting widespread concerns about corruption across many nations.
High-Performing Nations: The Case of Denmark and New Zealand
Leading the Corruption Perception Index in 2020, both Denmark and New Zealand scored 88, reflecting their robust governance frameworks and strong legal institutions. These countries benefit from transparent public sectors and active civil societies, which serve as critical deterrents to corruption. For instance, Denmarkโs commitment to anti-corruption is evident in its stringent regulatory practices and effective public sector auditing. Similarly, New Zealand's comprehensive legal framework and independent judiciary contribute to its high score, fostering an environment of accountability and transparency.
Challenges in the Lowest Scoring Nations
The lowest scores in the Corruption Perception Index 2020 were recorded by South Sudan and Somalia, both scoring 12. These nations face persistent challenges, including political instability and weak institutional frameworks, which exacerbate corruption levels. In South Sudan, ongoing conflict and lack of governance structures hinder anti-corruption efforts. Similarly, Somalia struggles with fragmented political systems and limited enforcement of anti-corruption laws, contributing to its low index score.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes
Examining the year-over-year changes, Maldives experienced the most significant improvement, with an increase of 14.00 points, representing a 48.3% rise. This reflects recent reforms aimed at increasing governmental transparency and reducing corruption. Armenia also saw notable progress, gaining 7.00 points, driven by governmental efforts to strengthen anti-corruption measures and promote judicial independence.
Conversely, Suriname experienced the most considerable decline, with a decrease of 6.00 points, a 13.6% drop. This decline may be attributed to political upheavals and economic challenges that have weakened institutional integrity. Similarly, Comoros faced a reduction of 4.00 points, reflecting ongoing issues with governance and enforcement of anti-corruption policies.
The Impact of Economic and Policy Factors
Economic stability and policy frameworks significantly influence a country's corruption perception. Nations like Singapore and Sweden, both scoring 85, showcase the benefits of economic prosperity coupled with strong regulatory systems. These countries utilize well-structured policies to combat corruption, fostering a culture of integrity and accountability.
In contrast, countries with weaker economies and less stringent policies, such as Venezuela (score of 15) and Sudan (score of 16), struggle with high levels of perceived corruption. Economic hardships often exacerbate the challenges of implementing effective anti-corruption measures, as resources are limited and enforcement mechanisms are weak.
Overall, the Corruption Perception Index 2020 highlights the nuanced landscape of global corruption, where strong governance and economic stability play pivotal roles in determining a country's position on the index. The data underscores the importance of continued efforts in policy reform and institutional strengthening to combat corruption effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions About Corruption Perception Index in 2020
Which country had the highest Corruption Perception Index in 2020?
Denmark had the highest Corruption Perception Index in 2020, with a score of 88.
What was the average Corruption Perception Index value in 2020?
The average Corruption Perception Index value in 2020 was 43.39.
Which country had the lowest Corruption Perception Index in 2020?
South Sudan had the lowest Corruption Perception Index in 2020, with a score of 12.
What was the median Corruption Perception Index value in 2020?
The median Corruption Perception Index value in 2020 was 40.
How many countries were included in the Corruption Perception Index dataset for 2020?
The Corruption Perception Index dataset for 2020 included 179 countries.
Which countries were among the top 10 in the Corruption Perception Index in 2020?
The top 10 countries in the Corruption Perception Index in 2020 included Denmark, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, Germany, and Luxembourg.
Insights by country
Ecuador
Ecuador's Corruption Perception Index in 2020 was 39 index, ranking it #93 out of 179 countries. This score is below the regional average for Latin America, indicating significant challenges in governance and transparency. Factors contributing to this perception include ongoing political instability, economic difficulties, and a history of corruption scandals that have affected public trust in institutions.
Bhutan
In 2020, Bhutan achieved a Corruption Perception Index value of 68 index, ranking #24 out of 179 countries. This score is notably higher than the global average, indicating a relatively low perception of corruption compared to many nations. Bhutan's strong performance can be attributed to its commitment to good governance and the promotion of transparency, alongside its unique approach to development that prioritizes Gross National Happiness over mere economic growth.
Madagascar
In 2020, Madagascar ranked #152 globally with a Corruption Perception Index value of 25 index. This score places Madagascar significantly lower than the regional average for Sub-Saharan Africa, indicating a serious issue with corruption compared to its neighbors. Factors contributing to this low perception include political instability, a lack of effective governance, and widespread poverty, which undermine public trust and accountability in institutions.
Mexico
In 2020, Mexico had a Corruption Perception Index value of 31 index, ranking #126 out of 179 countries. This score is significantly lower than the regional average for Latin America, which often reflects ongoing challenges in governance and law enforcement. Factors contributing to this perception include widespread corruption in law enforcement and political institutions, as well as the influence of organized crime on public officials.
Peru
In 2020, Peru had a Corruption Perception Index of 38 index, ranking #98 out of 179 countries. This score is below the regional average for Latin America, indicating significant challenges in governance compared to neighbors like Chile, which ranks higher. Key drivers of this perception include ongoing political instability, corruption scandals involving high-ranking officials, and inadequate enforcement of anti-corruption laws.
Norway
In 2020, Norway achieved a Corruption Perception Index score of 84 index, ranking #7 out of 179 countries. This score is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Norway's strong governance and low levels of corruption compared to many nations. Key drivers of this high ranking include a robust welfare system, transparency in public administration, and a high level of trust in government institutions.
Georgia
In 2020, Georgia achieved a Corruption Perception Index value of 56 index, ranking #45 out of 179 countries. This score is notably higher than the global average, reflecting ongoing reforms aimed at improving governance and reducing corruption. Key drivers of this performance include significant anti-corruption measures implemented since the early 2000s and a commitment to transparency in public administration.
Mauritius
In 2020, Mauritius achieved a Corruption Perception Index score of 53 index, ranking #55 out of 179 countries. This score is notably higher than the average in Sub-Saharan Africa, indicating a relatively lower level of perceived corruption in the region. Factors contributing to this perception include Mauritius's stable political environment, effective governance, and a commitment to transparency in its public sector.
Pakistan
In 2020, Pakistan ranked #127 with a Corruption Perception Index value of 31 index out of 179 countries. This score is significantly lower than the regional average for South Asia, indicating persistent governance challenges. Factors contributing to this perception of corruption include political instability, inadequate enforcement of anti-corruption laws, and a lack of transparency in public institutions.
Ireland
In 2020, Ireland achieved a Corruption Perception Index value of 72 index, ranking #20 out of 179 countries. This score positions Ireland above the global average, reflecting a relatively low level of perceived corruption compared to many other nations. Key factors contributing to this positive perception include strong legal frameworks, a robust regulatory environment, and a commitment to transparency in governance.
Data Source
Corruption Perceptions Index | Our World in Data
The Corruption Perceptions Index, compiled by Transparency International and featured on Our World in Data, measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption in various countries. It provides country-level statistics that reflect the perceptions of businesspeople and experts regarding corruption, using a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Corruption Perception Index data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data