Corruption Perception Index 2014
Corruption Perception Index ranks countries by perceived corruption levels. It influences investment decisions.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 92 index | |
2 | New Zealand | 91 index | |
3 | Finland | 89 index | |
4 | Sweden | 87 index | |
5 | Norway | 86 index | |
6 | Switzerland | 86 index | |
7 | Singapore | 84 index | |
8 | Netherlands | 83 index | |
9 | Luxembourg | 82 index | |
10 | Canada | 81 index | |
11 | Australia | 80 index | |
12 | Germany | 79 index | |
13 | Iceland | 79 index | |
14 | United Kingdom | 78 index | |
15 | Belgium | 76 index | |
16 | Japan | 76 index | |
17 | Barbados | 74 index | |
18 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 74 index | |
19 | Ireland | 74 index | |
20 | United States | 74 index | |
21 | Chile | 73 index | |
22 | Uruguay | 73 index | |
23 | Austria | 72 index | |
24 | Bahamas | 71 index | |
25 | Saint Lucia | 71 index | |
26 | United Arab Emirates | 70 index | |
27 | Estonia | 69 index | |
28 | France | 69 index | |
29 | Qatar | 69 index | |
30 | Bhutan | 65 index | |
31 | Botswana | 63 index | |
32 | Cyprus | 63 index | |
33 | Portugal | 63 index | |
34 | Puerto Rico | 63 index | |
35 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 62 index | |
36 | Poland | 61 index | |
37 | Taiwan | 61 index | |
38 | Israel | 60 index | |
39 | Spain | 60 index | |
40 | Dominica | 58 index | |
41 | Lithuania | 58 index | |
42 | Slovenia | 58 index | |
43 | Cabo Verde | 57 index | |
44 | Latvia | 55 index | |
45 | Malta | 55 index | |
46 | Seychelles | 55 index | |
47 | South Korea | 55 index | |
48 | Costa Rica | 54 index | |
49 | Hungary | 54 index | |
50 | Mauritius | 54 index | |
51 | Georgia | 52 index | |
52 | Malaysia | 52 index | |
53 | Czech Republic | 51 index | |
54 | Slovakia | 50 index | |
55 | Bahrain | 49 index | |
56 | Jordan | 49 index | |
57 | Lesotho | 49 index | |
58 | Namibia | 49 index | |
59 | Rwanda | 49 index | |
60 | Saudi Arabia | 49 index | |
61 | Croatia | 48 index | |
62 | Ghana | 48 index | |
63 | Cuba | 46 index | |
64 | North Macedonia | 45 index | |
65 | Oman | 45 index | |
66 | Turkey | 45 index | |
67 | Kuwait | 44 index | |
68 | South Africa | 44 index | |
69 | Brazil | 43 index | |
70 | Bulgaria | 43 index | |
71 | Eswatini | 43 index | |
72 | Greece | 43 index | |
73 | Italy | 43 index | |
74 | Romania | 43 index | |
75 | Senegal | 43 index | |
76 | Montenegro | 42 index | |
77 | Sao Tome and Principe | 42 index | |
78 | Serbia | 41 index | |
79 | Tunisia | 40 index | |
80 | Benin | 39 index | |
81 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 39 index | |
82 | El Salvador | 39 index | |
83 | Mongolia | 39 index | |
84 | Morocco | 39 index | |
85 | Burkina Faso | 38 index | |
86 | India | 38 index | |
87 | Jamaica | 38 index | |
88 | Peru | 38 index | |
89 | Philippines | 38 index | |
90 | Sri Lanka | 38 index | |
91 | Thailand | 38 index | |
92 | Trinidad and Tobago | 38 index | |
93 | Zambia | 38 index | |
94 | Armenia | 37 index | |
95 | Colombia | 37 index | |
96 | Egypt | 37 index | |
97 | Gabon | 37 index | |
98 | Liberia | 37 index | |
99 | Panama | 37 index | |
100 | Algeria | 36 index | |
101 | China | 36 index | |
102 | Suriname | 36 index | |
103 | Bolivia | 35 index | |
104 | Mexico | 35 index | |
105 | Republic of Moldova | 35 index | |
106 | Niger | 35 index | |
107 | Argentina | 34 index | |
108 | Djibouti | 34 index | |
109 | Indonesia | 34 index | |
110 | Albania | 33 index | |
111 | Ecuador | 33 index | |
112 | Ethiopia | 33 index | |
113 | Malawi | 33 index | |
114 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 32 index | |
115 | Dominican Republic | 32 index | |
116 | Guatemala | 32 index | |
117 | Mali | 32 index | |
118 | Belarus | 31 index | |
119 | Mozambique | 31 index | |
120 | Sierra Leone | 31 index | |
121 | Tanzania | 31 index | |
122 | Vietnam | 31 index | |
123 | Guyana | 30 index | |
124 | Mauritania | 30 index | |
125 | Azerbaijan | 29 index | |
126 | Gambia | 29 index | |
127 | Honduras | 29 index | |
128 | Kazakhstan | 29 index | |
129 | Nepal | 29 index | |
130 | Pakistan | 29 index | |
131 | Togo | 29 index | |
132 | Timor-Leste | 28 index | |
133 | Madagascar | 28 index | |
134 | Nicaragua | 28 index | |
135 | Cameroon | 27 index | |
136 | Iran | 27 index | |
137 | Kyrgyzstan | 27 index | |
138 | Lebanon | 27 index | |
139 | Nigeria | 27 index | |
140 | Russia | 27 index | |
141 | Comoros | 26 index | |
142 | Uganda | 26 index | |
143 | Ukraine | 26 index | |
144 | Bangladesh | 25 index | |
145 | Guinea | 25 index | |
146 | Kenya | 25 index | |
147 | Laos | 25 index | |
148 | Papua New Guinea | 25 index | |
149 | Central African Republic | 24 index | |
150 | Paraguay | 24 index | |
151 | Congo | 23 index | |
152 | Tajikistan | 23 index | |
153 | Chad | 22 index | |
154 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 22 index | |
155 | Cambodia | 21 index | |
156 | Myanmar | 21 index | |
157 | Zimbabwe | 21 index | |
158 | Burundi | 20 index | |
159 | Syrian Arab Republic | 20 index | |
160 | Angola | 19 index | |
161 | Guinea-Bissau | 19 index | |
162 | Haiti | 19 index | |
163 | Venezuela | 19 index | |
164 | Yemen | 19 index | |
165 | Eritrea | 18 index | |
166 | Libya | 18 index | |
167 | Uzbekistan | 18 index | |
168 | Turkmenistan | 17 index | |
169 | Iraq | 16 index | |
170 | South Sudan | 15 index | |
171 | Afghanistan | 12 index | |
172 | Sudan | 11 index | |
173 | North Korea | 8 index | |
174 | Somalia | 8 index |
- #1
Denmark
- #2
New Zealand
- #3
Finland
- #4
Sweden
- #5
Norway
- #6
Switzerland
- #7
Singapore
- #8
Netherlands
- #9
Luxembourg
- #10
Canada
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #174
Somalia
- #173
North Korea
- #172
Sudan
- #171
Afghanistan
- #170
South Sudan
- #169
Iraq
- #168
Turkmenistan
- #167
Uzbekistan
- #166
Libya
- #165
Eritrea
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Corruption Perception Index in 2014 was led by Denmark with the highest score of 92, while the global range spanned from 8 to 92. The average score across the 174 countries surveyed was 43.33, providing a benchmark for understanding global corruption perceptions.
High-Performing Nations and Governance Impact
Countries with the highest scores on the Corruption Perception Index in 2014, such as Denmark (92), New Zealand (91), and Finland (89), are often characterized by transparent governance structures and strong legal frameworks. These nations typically have robust anti-corruption policies, independent judicial systems, and active civil societies that promote accountability. For instance, Sweden (87) and Switzerland (86) are known for their well-regulated public sectors and low tolerance for corruption. Such environments attract foreign investment by minimizing the risk associated with corrupt practices, thus fostering economic stability and growth.
Challenges in Low-Scoring Countries
At the other end of the spectrum, countries like Somalia and North Korea scored the lowest with 8, reflecting severe governance and institutional challenges. These nations often face issues such as political instability, lack of transparency, and ineffective law enforcement, which hinder development and deter investment. Sudan (11) and Afghanistan (12) also struggle with persistent conflicts and weak state structures, exacerbating corruption issues. In such environments, corruption can become entrenched, impacting public service delivery and eroding trust in governmental institutions.
Year-over-Year Changes and Influencing Factors
In 2014, several countries experienced notable changes in their corruption perceptions. Egypt and Cรดte d'Ivoire saw the most significant improvements, each with a 5.00 point increase. These improvements can be attributed to political reforms and anti-corruption initiatives aimed at enhancing transparency and governance. Conversely, Turkey experienced a 5.00 point decrease, highlighting growing concerns over government transparency and press freedom. Similarly, China saw a decline of 4.00 points, reflecting ongoing challenges in reducing corruption despite high-profile anti-corruption campaigns.
Economic Impact and Investment Decisions
The Corruption Perception Index significantly influences investment decisions, as perceived corruption levels correlate with economic risk. High-scoring countries like Singapore (84) and Canada (81) are often seen as safe havens for investors, offering stable business environments and predictable legal systems. On the other hand, low-scoring countries such as Iraq (16) and Libya (18) may struggle to attract foreign investment due to the perceived high risk of corruption. Investors typically seek environments where the rule of law is upheld, and corruption does not impede business operations, making the Corruption Perception Index a valuable tool for assessing investment climates worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Corruption Perception Index in 2014
Which country had the highest Corruption Perception Index in 2014?
Denmark had the highest Corruption Perception Index in 2014 with a score of 92.
Which country had the lowest Corruption Perception Index in 2014?
Somalia had the lowest Corruption Perception Index in 2014 with a score of 8.
What was the average Corruption Perception Index value across all countries in 2014?
The average Corruption Perception Index value across all countries in 2014 was 43.33.
What was the median Corruption Perception Index value in 2014?
The median Corruption Perception Index value in 2014 was 38.
How many countries were included in the Corruption Perception Index dataset in 2014?
The Corruption Perception Index dataset in 2014 included 174 countries.
Which countries were in the top 10 of the Corruption Perception Index in 2014?
The top 10 countries in the Corruption Perception Index in 2014 were Denmark, New Zealand, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, Norway, Singapore, Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Canada.
Insights by country
Cambodia
Cambodia ranked #156 with a Corruption Perception Index value of 21 index in 2014. This score places Cambodia among the lowest in Southeast Asia, significantly below the regional average, indicating a high level of perceived corruption. Factors contributing to this low ranking include weak governance, limited accountability in public institutions, and ongoing issues related to political patronage and nepotism.
Malawi
In 2014, Malawi had a Corruption Perception Index value of 33 index, ranking #113 out of 174 countries. This score indicates significant challenges, as it is below the regional average for sub-Saharan Africa, which often struggles with governance issues. Factors contributing to Malawi's low score include a history of political instability, inadequate institutional frameworks, and persistent economic difficulties, which hinder effective anti-corruption measures.
Afghanistan
In 2014, Afghanistan ranked #171 out of 174 countries on the Corruption Perception Index, with a score of 12 index. This score places Afghanistan among the lowest globally, reflecting a significant challenge compared to regional neighbors, many of which have higher perceptions of governance. Factors contributing to this low perception include ongoing conflict, weak institutional frameworks, and pervasive corruption within government sectors, undermining public trust and effective governance.
Benin
In 2014, Benin had a Corruption Perception Index of 39 index, ranking #81 out of 174 countries. This score is below the regional average for West Africa, indicating significant challenges in governance and transparency. Factors contributing to this perception include political instability, limited accountability mechanisms, and ongoing issues with public sector corruption that hinder economic development and foreign investment.
Montenegro
In 2014, Montenegro had a Corruption Perception Index value of 42 index, ranking #76 out of 174 countries. This score reflects a significant challenge, as it is below the regional average for Southeast Europe, indicating persistent issues with corruption. Factors contributing to this perception include a history of political instability, a reliance on tourism, and ongoing reforms that have yet to fully address governance and accountability in public institutions.
Kazakhstan
In 2014, Kazakhstan had a Corruption Perception Index of 29 index, ranking #128 out of 174 countries. This score places Kazakhstan below the global average, reflecting significant challenges in governance compared to higher-ranked nations like Denmark, which consistently scores above 85. Factors contributing to this low perception include a lack of transparency in government processes, widespread bureaucratic corruption, and a political landscape dominated by a single party, which limits accountability.
Ecuador
Ecuador's Corruption Perception Index in 2014 was 33 index, ranking it #111 out of 174 countries. This score reflects significant challenges in governance, particularly when compared to regional neighbors like Colombia, which had a higher perception of integrity. Key drivers of Ecuador's low score include ongoing political instability and allegations of corruption within public institutions, impacting citizen trust and foreign investment.
Albania
In 2014, Albania had a Corruption Perception Index value of 33 index, ranking #110 out of 174 countries. This score is significantly below the European Union average, indicating persistent challenges in governance and transparency. Key drivers of this low perception include a history of political instability, weak institutional frameworks, and widespread corruption in public administration.
Brazil
In 2014, Brazil ranked #69 with a Corruption Perception Index value of 43 index out of 174 countries. This score reflects significant corruption challenges, especially when compared to neighboring Argentina, which scored 38. Factors contributing to Brazil's perceived corruption include widespread political scandals, such as the Operation Car Wash investigation, and systemic issues within public institutions that undermine governance and accountability.
Armenia
In 2014, Armenia had a Corruption Perception Index of 37 index, ranking #94 out of 174 countries. This score is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting ongoing challenges in governance and transparency. Key factors contributing to this perception include a legacy of political instability and economic reforms that have not fully addressed corruption in public institutions.
Data Source
Corruption Perceptions Index | Our World in Data
The Corruption Perceptions Index, compiled by Transparency International and featured on Our World in Data, measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption in various countries. It provides country-level statistics that reflect the perceptions of businesspeople and experts regarding corruption, using a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Corruption Perception Index data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data