Corruption Perception Index 2018
Corruption Perception Index ranks countries by perceived corruption levels. It influences investment decisions.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 88 index | |
2 | New Zealand | 87 index | |
3 | Finland | 85 index | |
4 | Singapore | 85 index | |
5 | Sweden | 85 index | |
6 | Switzerland | 85 index | |
7 | Norway | 84 index | |
8 | Netherlands | 82 index | |
9 | Canada | 81 index | |
10 | Luxembourg | 81 index | |
11 | Germany | 80 index | |
12 | United Kingdom | 80 index | |
13 | Australia | 77 index | |
14 | Austria | 76 index | |
15 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 76 index | |
16 | Iceland | 76 index | |
17 | Belgium | 75 index | |
18 | Estonia | 73 index | |
19 | Ireland | 73 index | |
20 | Japan | 73 index | |
21 | France | 72 index | |
22 | United States | 71 index | |
23 | United Arab Emirates | 70 index | |
24 | Uruguay | 70 index | |
25 | Barbados | 68 index | |
26 | Bhutan | 68 index | |
27 | Chile | 67 index | |
28 | Seychelles | 66 index | |
29 | Bahamas | 65 index | |
30 | Portugal | 64 index | |
31 | Brunei Darussalam | 63 index | |
32 | Taiwan | 63 index | |
33 | Qatar | 62 index | |
34 | Botswana | 61 index | |
35 | Israel | 61 index | |
36 | Poland | 60 index | |
37 | Slovenia | 60 index | |
38 | Cyprus | 59 index | |
39 | Czech Republic | 59 index | |
40 | Lithuania | 59 index | |
41 | Georgia | 58 index | |
42 | Latvia | 58 index | |
43 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 58 index | |
44 | Spain | 58 index | |
45 | Cabo Verde | 57 index | |
46 | Dominica | 57 index | |
47 | South Korea | 57 index | |
48 | Costa Rica | 56 index | |
49 | Rwanda | 56 index | |
50 | Saint Lucia | 55 index | |
51 | Malta | 54 index | |
52 | Namibia | 53 index | |
53 | Grenada | 52 index | |
54 | Italy | 52 index | |
55 | Oman | 52 index | |
56 | Mauritius | 51 index | |
57 | Slovakia | 50 index | |
58 | Jordan | 49 index | |
59 | Saudi Arabia | 49 index | |
60 | Croatia | 48 index | |
61 | Cuba | 47 index | |
62 | Malaysia | 47 index | |
63 | Romania | 47 index | |
64 | Hungary | 46 index | |
65 | Sao Tome and Principe | 46 index | |
66 | Vanuatu | 46 index | |
67 | Greece | 45 index | |
68 | Montenegro | 45 index | |
69 | Senegal | 45 index | |
70 | Belarus | 44 index | |
71 | Jamaica | 44 index | |
72 | Solomon Islands | 44 index | |
73 | Morocco | 43 index | |
74 | South Africa | 43 index | |
75 | Suriname | 43 index | |
76 | Tunisia | 43 index | |
77 | Bulgaria | 42 index | |
78 | Burkina Faso | 41 index | |
79 | Ghana | 41 index | |
80 | India | 41 index | |
81 | Kuwait | 41 index | |
82 | Lesotho | 41 index | |
83 | Trinidad and Tobago | 41 index | |
84 | Turkey | 41 index | |
85 | Argentina | 40 index | |
86 | Benin | 40 index | |
87 | China | 39 index | |
88 | Serbia | 39 index | |
89 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 38 index | |
90 | Eswatini | 38 index | |
91 | Indonesia | 38 index | |
92 | Sri Lanka | 38 index | |
93 | Gambia | 37 index | |
94 | Guyana | 37 index | |
95 | Mongolia | 37 index | |
96 | North Macedonia | 37 index | |
97 | Panama | 37 index | |
98 | Albania | 36 index | |
99 | Bahrain | 36 index | |
100 | Colombia | 36 index | |
101 | Philippines | 36 index | |
102 | Tanzania | 36 index | |
103 | Thailand | 36 index | |
104 | Algeria | 35 index | |
105 | Armenia | 35 index | |
106 | Brazil | 35 index | |
107 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 35 index | |
108 | Timor-Leste | 35 index | |
109 | Egypt | 35 index | |
110 | El Salvador | 35 index | |
111 | Peru | 35 index | |
112 | Zambia | 35 index | |
113 | Ecuador | 34 index | |
114 | Ethiopia | 34 index | |
115 | Niger | 34 index | |
116 | Republic of Moldova | 33 index | |
117 | Pakistan | 33 index | |
118 | Vietnam | 33 index | |
119 | Liberia | 32 index | |
120 | Malawi | 32 index | |
121 | Mali | 32 index | |
122 | Ukraine | 32 index | |
123 | Djibouti | 31 index | |
124 | Gabon | 31 index | |
125 | Kazakhstan | 31 index | |
126 | Maldives | 31 index | |
127 | Nepal | 31 index | |
128 | Dominican Republic | 30 index | |
129 | Sierra Leone | 30 index | |
130 | Togo | 30 index | |
131 | Bolivia | 29 index | |
132 | Honduras | 29 index | |
133 | Kyrgyzstan | 29 index | |
134 | Laos | 29 index | |
135 | Myanmar | 29 index | |
136 | Paraguay | 29 index | |
137 | Guinea | 28 index | |
138 | Iran | 28 index | |
139 | Lebanon | 28 index | |
140 | Mexico | 28 index | |
141 | Papua New Guinea | 28 index | |
142 | Russia | 28 index | |
143 | Comoros | 27 index | |
144 | Guatemala | 27 index | |
145 | Kenya | 27 index | |
146 | Mauritania | 27 index | |
147 | Nigeria | 27 index | |
148 | Bangladesh | 26 index | |
149 | Central African Republic | 26 index | |
150 | Uganda | 26 index | |
151 | Azerbaijan | 25 index | |
152 | Cameroon | 25 index | |
153 | Madagascar | 25 index | |
154 | Nicaragua | 25 index | |
155 | Tajikistan | 25 index | |
156 | Eritrea | 24 index | |
157 | Mozambique | 23 index | |
158 | Uzbekistan | 23 index | |
159 | Zimbabwe | 22 index | |
160 | Cambodia | 20 index | |
161 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 20 index | |
162 | Haiti | 20 index | |
163 | Turkmenistan | 20 index | |
164 | Angola | 19 index | |
165 | Chad | 19 index | |
166 | Congo | 19 index | |
167 | Iraq | 18 index | |
168 | Venezuela | 18 index | |
169 | Burundi | 17 index | |
170 | Libya | 17 index | |
171 | Afghanistan | 16 index | |
172 | Equatorial Guinea | 16 index | |
173 | Guinea-Bissau | 16 index | |
174 | Sudan | 16 index | |
175 | North Korea | 14 index | |
176 | Yemen | 14 index | |
177 | South Sudan | 13 index | |
178 | Syrian Arab Republic | 13 index | |
179 | Somalia | 10 index |
- #1
Denmark
- #2
New Zealand
- #3
Finland
- #4
Singapore
- #5
Sweden
- #6
Switzerland
- #7
Norway
- #8
Netherlands
- #9
Canada
- #10
Luxembourg
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #179
Somalia
- #178
Syrian Arab Republic
- #177
South Sudan
- #176
Yemen
- #175
North Korea
- #174
Sudan
- #173
Guinea-Bissau
- #172
Equatorial Guinea
- #171
Afghanistan
- #170
Libya
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Corruption Perception Index (CPI) for 2018 was led by Denmark with the highest score of 88, while the global range spanned from a low of 10 to this peak. The global average score was 43.15, indicating a widespread perception of corruption across many nations.
High-Performing Nations: Governance and Stability
The countries scoring highest on the Corruption Perception Index in 2018, such as Denmark (88), New Zealand (87), and Sweden (85), share common traits that contribute to their top rankings. These nations are characterized by stable governance, effective public institutions, and strong legal frameworks. For instance, Denmark is renowned for its transparent public sector and robust anti-corruption policies. Similarly, New Zealand benefits from stringent regulatory controls and a culture of accountability. These factors collectively enhance public trust and minimize corruption risks.
Challenges in Low-Scoring Regions
The bottom of the CPI reflects significant governance challenges. Somalia, with a score of 10, and South Sudan and the Syrian Arab Republic, both scoring 13, illustrate the impact of prolonged conflict and weak institutional structures. In these regions, the absence of effective governance frameworks and ongoing conflicts severely undermine transparency and accountability, fostering environments conducive to corruption. For example, Somalia has struggled with instability and limited governmental reach, exacerbating corruption perceptions.
Analyzing Year-over-Year Changes
Notable improvements in the CPI were seen in countries like Oman and Gambia, with increases of 8.00 and 7.00 points respectively. Oman's rise can be attributed to efforts in enhancing regulatory frameworks and public sector reforms aimed at increasing transparency. Conversely, countries like Azerbaijan and Burundi experienced significant declines, with drops of 6.00 and 5.00 points. These declines often reflect political upheavals or deteriorating governance standards, as seen in Burundi, where political tensions have undermined efforts to combat corruption.
Correlation with Economic and Policy Factors
There is a discernible correlation between economic stability and CPI scores. Nations like Singapore (85) and Switzerland (85) not only rank high due to rigorous anti-corruption measures but also benefit from strong economic frameworks that support these policies. Economic prosperity often provides the resources necessary to implement comprehensive anti-corruption strategies, thereby fostering environments less susceptible to corrupt practices. Conversely, countries like Yemen (14) and Guinea-Bissau (16) face economic challenges that impede the development of effective anti-corruption measures, perpetuating low scores.
In conclusion, the Corruption Perception Index for 2018 highlights significant disparities in perceived corruption levels across the globe. The index underscores the importance of robust governance structures, economic stability, and effective policy implementation in mitigating corruption. By analyzing both the top-performing and struggling nations, it becomes evident that addressing corruption requires a multifaceted approach tailored to the unique challenges and strengths of each country.
Frequently Asked Questions About Corruption Perception Index in 2018
Which country had the highest Corruption Perception Index in 2018?
Denmark had the highest Corruption Perception Index in 2018 with a score of 88.
Which country had the lowest Corruption Perception Index in 2018?
Somalia had the lowest Corruption Perception Index in 2018 with a score of 10.
What was the average Corruption Perception Index value in 2018?
The average Corruption Perception Index value in 2018 was 43.15.
What was the median Corruption Perception Index value in 2018?
The median Corruption Perception Index value in 2018 was 38.
How many countries were included in the Corruption Perception Index dataset in 2018?
The dataset included 179 countries in 2018.
Which countries were in the top 3 for the Corruption Perception Index in 2018?
The top 3 countries in the Corruption Perception Index in 2018 were Denmark, New Zealand, and Sweden.
Insights by country
Thailand
In 2018, Thailand ranked #102 with a Corruption Perception Index value of 36 index out of 179 countries. This score is below the regional average for Southeast Asia, indicating significant challenges in governance compared to its neighbors. Key drivers of this perception include ongoing political instability, a history of military influence in governance, and limited transparency in public sector processes.
India
In 2018, India had a Corruption Perception Index value of 41 index, ranking #79 out of 179 countries. This score places India below the global average, highlighting significant challenges in governance compared to higher-ranked nations like New Zealand, which consistently scores above 80. Factors contributing to India's score include widespread bureaucratic inefficiencies, political corruption, and a complex regulatory environment that can hinder transparency and accountability.
Finland
In 2018, Finland achieved a Corruption Perception Index score of 85 index, ranking #3 out of 179 countries. This score positions Finland significantly above the global average, reflecting its strong institutional frameworks and low levels of corruption compared to many nations. Key drivers of this impressive ranking include Finland's transparent governance practices, robust legal systems, and a strong emphasis on public sector integrity.
Haiti
In 2018, Haiti ranked #162 out of 179 countries on the Corruption Perception Index, with a value of 20 index. This places Haiti among the lowest globally, significantly below the regional average for the Caribbean. Contributing factors include longstanding political instability, weak governance structures, and pervasive poverty, which undermine efforts to combat corruption and promote transparency.
Belgium
In 2018, Belgium achieved a Corruption Perception Index value of 75 index, ranking #17 out of 179 countries. This places Belgium above the global average, indicating a relatively low level of perceived corruption compared to many nations. Factors contributing to this perception include a strong legal framework, active civil society, and a robust public administration that emphasizes transparency and accountability.
Somalia
In 2018, Somalia ranked #179 with a Corruption Perception Index value of 10 index, the lowest score globally. This places Somalia significantly behind regional neighbors, highlighting a pervasive issue of corruption in governance. The country's ongoing conflict, lack of effective institutions, and weak rule of law are critical drivers of this low perception, severely hindering efforts for economic recovery and stability.
Ukraine
In 2018, Ukraine had a Corruption Perception Index of 32 index, ranking #122 out of 179 countries. This score is significantly lower than the regional average for Eastern Europe, indicating persistent challenges in governance and transparency. Key drivers of this low perception include ongoing political instability, the influence of oligarchs, and a history of weak institutional frameworks that hinder anti-corruption efforts.
United States
In 2018, the United States achieved a Corruption Perception Index value of 71 index, ranking #22 out of 179 countries. This places the U.S. above the global average, indicating a relatively low perception of corruption compared to many nations, though it still trails behind top performers like Denmark and New Zealand. Factors contributing to this score include a strong legal framework and active civil society, although challenges such as political polarization and campaign finance issues continue to raise concerns about transparency.
El Salvador
In 2018, El Salvador had a Corruption Perception Index value of 35 index, ranking #107 out of 179 countries. This score is significantly lower than the regional average for Latin America, indicating a challenging environment for governance and transparency. Contributing factors to this low perception include high levels of crime, political instability, and pervasive corruption within public institutions.
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde achieved a Corruption Perception Index value of 57 index in 2018, ranking #45 out of 179 countries. This score is notably higher than the global average, indicating a relatively low perception of corruption compared to many nations. Factors contributing to this positive perception include the country's stable political environment and effective governance, which have fostered transparency and accountability in public institutions.
Data Source
Corruption Perceptions Index | Our World in Data
The Corruption Perceptions Index, compiled by Transparency International and featured on Our World in Data, measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption in various countries. It provides country-level statistics that reflect the perceptions of businesspeople and experts regarding corruption, using a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Corruption Perception Index data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data