Youth Unemployment Rate 2002
Youth unemployment rate shows the percentage of young people actively seeking but unable to find work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Djibouti | 66.37 % | |
2 | North Macedonia | 58.444 % | |
3 | Montenegro | 55.43 % | |
4 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 54.884 % | |
5 | Eswatini | 51.557 % | |
6 | Libya | 46.894 % | |
7 | Algeria | 46.034 % | |
8 | Botswana | 43.486 % | |
9 | South Africa | 43.35 % | |
10 | Poland | 43.322 % | |
11 | New Caledonia | 42.549 % | |
12 | Namibia | 41.736 % | |
13 | Argentina | 41.353 % | |
14 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 41.074 % | |
15 | Congo | 39.249 % | |
16 | State of Palestine | 38.739 % | |
17 | Angola | 38.428 % | |
18 | Uruguay | 37.887 % | |
19 | Slovakia | 37.428 % | |
20 | Croatia | 36.533 % | |
21 | Bulgaria | 35.608 % | |
22 | Jordan | 35.349 % | |
23 | Gabon | 34.845 % | |
24 | Somalia | 33.7 % | |
25 | Saint Lucia | 33.507 % | |
26 | French Polynesia | 33.02 % | |
27 | Serbia | 31.327 % | |
28 | Tunisia | 30.395 % | |
29 | Finland | 28.8 % | |
30 | Albania | 28.774 % | |
31 | Sri Lanka | 28.545 % | |
32 | Venezuela | 27.187 % | |
33 | Italy | 27.171 % | |
34 | Guam | 27.07 % | |
35 | Colombia | 26.895 % | |
36 | Greece | 26.711 % | |
37 | Haiti | 26.489 % | |
38 | Suriname | 26.45 % | |
39 | Egypt | 26.4 % | |
40 | Zambia | 25.983 % | |
41 | Mauritius | 25.739 % | |
42 | Latvia | 25.252 % | |
43 | Iran | 25.174 % | |
44 | Georgia | 25.086 % | |
45 | Chile | 24.977 % | |
46 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.254 % | |
47 | Sudan | 24.115 % | |
48 | Cabo Verde | 23.98 % | |
49 | Guyana | 23.901 % | |
50 | Saudi Arabia | 23.889 % | |
51 | Puerto Rico | 23.327 % | |
52 | Barbados | 22.994 % | |
53 | Romania | 22.688 % | |
54 | Lesotho | 22.382 % | |
55 | Azerbaijan | 21.604 % | |
56 | Spain | 21.544 % | |
57 | Indonesia | 21.434 % | |
58 | United States Virgin Islands | 21.234 % | |
59 | Uzbekistan | 20.986 % | |
60 | Trinidad and Tobago | 20.929 % | |
61 | Israel | 20.845 % | |
62 | India | 20.761 % | |
63 | Syrian Arab Republic | 20.684 % | |
64 | Brazil | 20.603 % | |
65 | Lebanon | 20.473 % | |
66 | Lithuania | 20.422 % | |
67 | Bahamas | 20.375 % | |
68 | Belize | 20.362 % | |
69 | Estonia | 20.194 % | |
70 | Turkmenistan | 19.761 % | |
71 | Belarus | 19.298 % | |
72 | Yemen | 19.237 % | |
73 | Nepal | 18.955 % | |
74 | Turkey | 18.944 % | |
75 | Ukraine | 18.926 % | |
76 | France | 18.846 % | |
77 | South Sudan | 18.446 % | |
78 | Brunei Darussalam | 17.892 % | |
79 | Morocco | 17.599 % | |
80 | Kazakhstan | 16.697 % | |
81 | Iraq | 16.64 % | |
82 | Jamaica | 16.598 % | |
83 | Paraguay | 16.531 % | |
84 | Czech Republic | 15.982 % | |
85 | Belgium | 15.652 % | |
86 | Russia | 15.558 % | |
87 | Mauritania | 15.49 % | |
88 | Malta | 15.433 % | |
89 | Rwanda | 15.368 % | |
90 | Republic of Moldova | 15.334 % | |
91 | Equatorial Guinea | 15.063 % | |
92 | Slovenia | 14.904 % | |
93 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 14.814 % | |
94 | Gambia | 14.592 % | |
95 | Costa Rica | 14.457 % | |
96 | Vanuatu | 14.368 % | |
97 | Ghana | 14.261 % | |
98 | Panama | 13.852 % | |
99 | Canada | 13.618 % | |
100 | Oman | 13.526 % | |
101 | Norway | 13.036 % | |
102 | Sweden | 12.924 % | |
103 | Australia | 12.794 % | |
104 | Dominican Republic | 12.721 % | |
105 | Tonga | 12.509 % | |
106 | Armenia | 12.095 % | |
107 | United States | 11.935 % | |
108 | Samoa | 11.891 % | |
109 | Nicaragua | 11.88 % | |
110 | Hungary | 11.754 % | |
111 | New Zealand | 11.728 % | |
112 | Fiji | 11.447 % | |
113 | Malaysia | 11.191 % | |
114 | Central African Republic | 11.017 % | |
115 | China, Macao SAR | 10.844 % | |
116 | United Kingdom | 10.779 % | |
117 | El Salvador | 10.777 % | |
118 | Singapore | 10.767 % | |
119 | Portugal | 10.448 % | |
120 | Eritrea | 10.428 % | |
121 | Afghanistan | 10.181 % | |
122 | Cameroon | 10.117 % | |
123 | Japan | 10.062 % | |
124 | Zimbabwe | 9.886 % | |
125 | Timor-Leste | 9.72 % | |
126 | Mongolia | 9.66 % | |
127 | Comoros | 9.561 % | |
128 | Ecuador | 9.507 % | |
129 | Germany | 9.285 % | |
130 | Philippines | 9.169 % | |
131 | Maldives | 8.945 % | |
132 | China | 8.919 % | |
133 | North Korea | 7.995 % | |
134 | South Korea | 7.902 % | |
135 | Bangladesh | 7.782 % | |
136 | Madagascar | 7.645 % | |
137 | Cyprus | 7.449 % | |
138 | Ireland | 7.358 % | |
139 | Togo | 7.295 % | |
140 | CΓ΄te d'Ivoire | 7.278 % | |
141 | Sierra Leone | 7.247 % | |
142 | Nigeria | 7.219 % | |
143 | Austria | 7.137 % | |
144 | Denmark | 7.043 % | |
145 | Honduras | 6.963 % | |
146 | Luxembourg | 6.948 % | |
147 | Malawi | 6.937 % | |
148 | Kenya | 6.885 % | |
149 | Cuba | 6.83 % | |
150 | Mozambique | 6.246 % | |
151 | United Arab Emirates | 6.184 % | |
152 | Iceland | 6.158 % | |
153 | Mexico | 6.093 % | |
154 | Peru | 5.935 % | |
155 | Thailand | 5.756 % | |
156 | Tajikistan | 5.713 % | |
157 | Guinea | 5.636 % | |
158 | Switzerland | 5.586 % | |
159 | Bhutan | 5.49 % | |
160 | Tanzania | 5.451 % | |
161 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 5.21 % | |
162 | Uganda | 5.147 % | |
163 | Papua New Guinea | 4.941 % | |
164 | Bolivia | 4.744 % | |
165 | Kyrgyzstan | 4.576 % | |
166 | Netherlands | 4.54 % | |
167 | Ethiopia | 4.472 % | |
168 | Vietnam | 4.418 % | |
169 | Burkina Faso | 4.414 % | |
170 | Kuwait | 4.224 % | |
171 | Bahrain | 4.162 % | |
172 | Burundi | 3.871 % | |
173 | Niger | 3.831 % | |
174 | Guinea-Bissau | 3.828 % | |
175 | Laos | 3.746 % | |
176 | Solomon Islands | 3.701 % | |
177 | Guatemala | 3.442 % | |
178 | Liberia | 3.099 % | |
179 | Senegal | 2.938 % | |
180 | Qatar | 2.728 % | |
181 | Mali | 2.113 % | |
182 | Cambodia | 1.395 % | |
183 | Myanmar | 1.333 % | |
184 | Chad | 1.117 % | |
185 | Pakistan | 0.95 % | |
186 | Benin | 0.826 % |
- #1
Djibouti
- #2
North Macedonia
- #3
Montenegro
- #4
Bosnia and Herzegovina
- #5
Eswatini
- #6
Libya
- #7
Algeria
- #8
Botswana
- #9
South Africa
- #10
Poland
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Benin
- #185
Pakistan
- #184
Chad
- #183
Myanmar
- #182
Cambodia
- #181
Mali
- #180
Qatar
- #179
Senegal
- #178
Liberia
- #177
Guatemala
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2002, Djibouti recorded the highest Youth Unemployment Rate globally at 66.37%, while the range of youth unemployment rates spanned from 0.83% to 66.37% across 186 countries. The global average youth unemployment rate was 17.64%, providing a significant benchmark for understanding global employment challenges among young people.
Economic Instability and High Youth Unemployment
The stark differences in youth unemployment rates can often be traced to economic instability and structural issues within specific countries. For instance, North Macedonia and Montenegro had rates of 58.44% and 55.43% respectively, reflecting the economic transitions and challenges these countries faced in the early 2000s. Similarly, Bosnia and Herzegovina had a youth unemployment rate of 54.88%, indicating ongoing recovery issues from the conflicts of the 1990s.
In Africa, countries such as Eswatini and South Africa displayed high youth unemployment rates of 51.56% and 43.35% respectively. These figures can be attributed to a combination of rapid population growth, insufficient job creation, and economic policies that have historically marginalized young job seekers. The situation in Libya and Algeria also highlights the impact of political instability and dependency on oil revenues, with youth unemployment at 46.89% and 46.03% respectively.
Low Youth Unemployment in Developing Economies
Conversely, some developing countries reported remarkably low youth unemployment rates, often due to high levels of informal employment. Benin and Pakistan, for example, had youth unemployment rates of just 0.83% and 0.95% respectively. These figures reflect economies where young people often engage in subsistence agriculture or informal sector jobs that do not register in official unemployment statistics.
This trend is also visible in countries like Myanmar and Cambodia, with youth unemployment rates of 1.33% and 1.40%. Here, the lack of formal job opportunities pushes youth into informal labor markets, which may not be ideal but do provide some form of employment, thus keeping official unemployment rates low.
Year-over-Year Trends and Significant Changes
Analyzing the year-over-year changes in youth unemployment rates reveals some notable shifts. State of Palestine experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 7.46% (23.8%), reflecting ongoing political and economic instability. Similarly, Georgia and Paraguay saw increases of 6.31% (33.6%) and 5.31% (47.3%) respectively, indicating economic challenges and possibly ineffective youth employment policies.
In contrast, Lithuania exhibited the most substantial decrease in youth unemployment, dropping by 11.10% (-35.2%). This decrease could be attributed to successful integration into the European market and effective labor policies. Other countries like Guam and Estonia also saw decreases of 4.45% (-14.1%) and 3.65% (-15.3%), possibly due to improving economic conditions and targeted employment programs.
Policy Implications and Future Directions
The wide disparity in youth unemployment rates across countries in 2002 underscores the importance of tailored economic policies and labor market interventions. Countries with high youth unemployment rates need to focus on diversifying their economies, improving education systems, and creating more inclusive labor markets. In contrast, nations with low unemployment should aim to transition informal employment into more stable, formal job opportunities to ensure sustainable economic growth.
Understanding these patterns is crucial for policymakers aiming to address youth unemployment effectively. By learning from both high and low unemployment contexts, countries can adopt best practices and avoid pitfalls as they strive to improve employment outcomes for young people globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Unemployment Rate in 2002
Which country had the highest youth unemployment rate in 2002?
Djibouti had the highest youth unemployment rate in 2002, with 66.37%.
Which country had the lowest youth unemployment rate in 2002?
Benin had the lowest youth unemployment rate in 2002, with 0.83%.
What was the average youth unemployment rate across all countries in 2002?
The average youth unemployment rate across all countries in 2002 was 17.64%.
What was the median youth unemployment rate in 2002?
The median youth unemployment rate in 2002 was 14.7%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth unemployment rates in 2002?
The top 3 countries for youth unemployment rates in 2002 were Djibouti (66.37%), North Macedonia (58.44%), and Montenegro (55.43%).
What was the youth unemployment rate range among the countries in 2002?
The youth unemployment rate ranged from 0.83% in Benin to 66.37% in Djibouti in 2002.
Insights by country
Liberia
In 2002, Liberia had a Youth Unemployment Rate of 3.099 %, ranking #178 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably low compared to many nations emerging from conflict, reflecting the challenging economic conditions in the region. The country's recovery from years of civil war and instability has limited job creation, particularly for young people entering the workforce.
United States
In 2002, the United States had a Youth Unemployment Rate of 11.935%, ranking #107 out of 186 countries. This rate was higher than the global average, reflecting challenges faced by young job seekers in a recovering economy. Contributing factors included the aftermath of the 2001 recession, which led to slower job growth, and a mismatch between the skills of young workers and the demands of the labor market.
Denmark
In 2002, Denmark had a youth unemployment rate of 7.043%, ranking #144 out of 186 countries. This rate was higher than the European Union average at the time, reflecting challenges in integrating young individuals into the labor market. Contributing factors included a strong emphasis on vocational training and labor market policies that encouraged flexibility, but also a period of economic restructuring that affected job availability for youth.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
In 2002, Bosnia and Herzegovina had a Youth Unemployment Rate of 54.884%, ranking #4 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting challenges in the labor market. Key factors contributing to this high unemployment include the country's post-war economic recovery struggles, a lack of job creation in the private sector, and a mismatch between educational outcomes and labor market needs.
China
In 2002, China had a Youth Unemployment Rate of 8.919%, ranking #132 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly higher than many neighboring countries, reflecting the challenges of a rapidly changing economy. Key factors contributing to this statistic included a large influx of young workers into the job market and the structural shifts from agriculture to industry, which often left many youth without the necessary skills for available positions.
Republic of Moldova
In 2002, the Republic of Moldova had a youth unemployment rate of 15.334%, ranking #90 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting significant economic challenges in the post-Soviet transition. Contributing factors included a lack of job opportunities in key sectors and a high rate of emigration, which limited the local labor market's capacity to absorb young workers.
Vanuatu
In 2002, Vanuatu had a Youth Unemployment Rate of 14.368 %, ranking #96 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than that of many neighboring Pacific island nations, indicating significant challenges in youth employment. Contributing factors include Vanuatu's reliance on tourism and agriculture, which are often seasonal and vulnerable to external shocks, as well as limited diversification in its economy.
Czech Republic
In 2002, the Czech Republic had a Youth Unemployment Rate of 15.982%, ranking #84 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in the labor market for young individuals. Key factors contributing to this rate included the transition from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented one, which created structural unemployment, particularly among youth seeking entry-level positions.
Poland
In 2002, Poland had a Youth Unemployment Rate of 43.322%, ranking #10 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly higher than the European Union average at the time, reflecting the challenges faced by young job seekers in transitioning from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented one. Contributing factors included a lack of job creation in sectors appealing to youth and a mismatch between educational outcomes and labor market needs.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan's Youth Unemployment Rate in 2002 was 21.604%, ranking it #55 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting challenges faced by the country's labor market. The high youth unemployment can be attributed to the transition from a centrally planned economy to a market economy, which created significant job mismatches and limited opportunities for young workers.
Data Source
Youth unemployment rate
Our World in Data is an online publication that presents empirical research and data on global issues. The "Youth unemployment rate" dataset offers country-level statistics on the unemployment rates specifically for young people, allowing for comparative analysis across different nations and time periods.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Unemployment Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data