Old-Age Dependency Ratio 2001
Old-age dependency ratio compares the number of elderly dependents to working-age people, affecting economic sustainability.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Holy See | 42.534 % | |
2 | Monaco | 34.729 % | |
3 | Italy | 27.515 % | |
4 | Sweden | 26.669 % | |
5 | Japan | 26.592 % | |
6 | Belgium | 25.766 % | |
7 | Greece | 25.752 % | |
8 | Isle of Man | 25.592 % | |
9 | Germany | 24.9 % | |
10 | France | 24.773 % | |
11 | Bulgaria | 24.716 % | |
12 | Spain | 24.517 % | |
13 | Croatia | 24.363 % | |
14 | Portugal | 24.308 % | |
15 | Serbia | 24.305 % | |
16 | United Kingdom | 24.304 % | |
17 | Gibraltar | 23.348 % | |
18 | Norway | 23.085 % | |
19 | Guernsey | 22.942 % | |
20 | Switzerland | 22.9 % | |
21 | Austria | 22.825 % | |
22 | Montserrat | 22.714 % | |
23 | Estonia | 22.622 % | |
24 | Latvia | 22.599 % | |
25 | San Marino | 22.59 % | |
26 | Finland | 22.522 % | |
27 | Denmark | 22.233 % | |
28 | Hungary | 21.949 % | |
29 | Lithuania | 21.43 % | |
30 | Faroe Islands | 21.382 % | |
31 | Uruguay | 21.066 % | |
32 | Luxembourg | 20.769 % | |
33 | Romania | 20.26 % | |
34 | Slovenia | 20.224 % | |
35 | Belarus | 20.127 % | |
36 | Jersey | 20.069 % | |
37 | Netherlands | 19.96 % | |
38 | Ukraine | 19.721 % | |
39 | Czech Republic | 19.678 % | |
40 | Georgia | 19.516 % | |
41 | Australia | 18.566 % | |
42 | Canada | 18.419 % | |
43 | Puerto Rico | 18.346 % | |
44 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | 18.178 % | |
45 | Malta | 18.175 % | |
46 | United States | 18.144 % | |
47 | Poland | 18.113 % | |
48 | Martinique | 18.075 % | |
49 | New Zealand | 18.023 % | |
50 | Russia | 17.777 % | |
51 | Iceland | 17.774 % | |
52 | Andorra | 17.682 % | |
53 | Saint Helena | 17.278 % | |
54 | Montenegro | 17.077 % | |
55 | Barbados | 16.782 % | |
56 | Dominica | 16.643 % | |
57 | Ireland | 16.514 % | |
58 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 16.481 % | |
59 | Slovakia | 16.365 % | |
60 | Guadeloupe | 16.07 % | |
61 | Bermuda | 15.968 % | |
62 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 15.724 % | |
63 | Israel | 15.664 % | |
64 | Argentina | 15.598 % | |
65 | Republic of Moldova | 15.24 % | |
66 | North Macedonia | 14.877 % | |
67 | Liechtenstein | 14.792 % | |
68 | Cyprus | 14.694 % | |
69 | Niue | 14.669 % | |
70 | Grenada | 14.639 % | |
71 | Curaçao | 14.628 % | |
72 | Cuba | 14.582 % | |
73 | Armenia | 14.566 % | |
74 | United States Virgin Islands | 13.496 % | |
75 | Chile | 12.808 % | |
76 | Taiwan | 12.387 % | |
77 | Tokelau | 12.257 % | |
78 | Saint Barthélemy | 12.189 % | |
79 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 12.113 % | |
80 | Albania | 11.996 % | |
81 | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 11.545 % | |
82 | Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba | 11.536 % | |
83 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.535 % | |
84 | Seychelles | 11.349 % | |
85 | Antigua and Barbuda | 11.234 % | |
86 | Anguilla | 11.019 % | |
87 | Réunion | 10.763 % | |
88 | Saint Lucia | 10.591 % | |
89 | Bahamas | 10.516 % | |
90 | China | 10.457 % | |
91 | South Korea | 10.366 % | |
92 | Cook Islands | 10.34 % | |
93 | Kazakhstan | 10.27 % | |
94 | China, Macao SAR | 10.104 % | |
95 | Tuvalu | 10.101 % | |
96 | Aruba | 10.061 % | |
97 | North Korea | 9.868 % | |
98 | Jamaica | 9.717 % | |
99 | Tonga | 9.675 % | |
100 | Vietnam | 9.563 % | |
101 | Wallis and Futuna Islands | 9.547 % | |
102 | Bolivia | 9.392 % | |
103 | Sri Lanka | 9.341 % | |
104 | Turkey | 9.278 % | |
105 | Thailand | 9.158 % | |
106 | Mauritius | 9.062 % | |
107 | Cabo Verde | 9.026 % | |
108 | Costa Rica | 8.931 % | |
109 | Kyrgyzstan | 8.92 % | |
110 | Azerbaijan | 8.901 % | |
111 | Gabon | 8.873 % | |
112 | Tunisia | 8.674 % | |
113 | New Caledonia | 8.546 % | |
114 | El Salvador | 8.459 % | |
115 | Singapore | 8.456 % | |
116 | Mexico | 8.41 % | |
117 | Guam | 8.401 % | |
118 | Comoros | 8.377 % | |
119 | Lebanon | 8.203 % | |
120 | Samoa | 8.167 % | |
121 | Lesotho | 8.138 % | |
122 | Brazil | 8.034 % | |
123 | Panama | 8.01 % | |
124 | Ecuador | 7.977 % | |
125 | Indonesia | 7.946 % | |
126 | Uzbekistan | 7.94 % | |
127 | Myanmar | 7.917 % | |
128 | Sao Tome and Principe | 7.884 % | |
129 | South Africa | 7.876 % | |
130 | Guinea | 7.765 % | |
131 | Venezuela | 7.689 % | |
132 | Suriname | 7.626 % | |
133 | Greenland | 7.584 % | |
134 | Palau | 7.427 % | |
135 | Cayman Islands | 7.423 % | |
136 | India | 7.388 % | |
137 | Peru | 7.371 % | |
138 | Colombia | 7.307 % | |
139 | Dominican Republic | 7.203 % | |
140 | Guatemala | 7.129 % | |
141 | Morocco | 7.099 % | |
142 | Algeria | 7.093 % | |
143 | Trinidad and Tobago | 7.09 % | |
144 | Belize | 7.052 % | |
145 | Paraguay | 7.014 % | |
146 | Nepal | 6.954 % | |
147 | Malawi | 6.869 % | |
148 | Maldives | 6.84 % | |
149 | French Polynesia | 6.796 % | |
150 | Turkmenistan | 6.792 % | |
151 | Bhutan | 6.786 % | |
152 | Egypt | 6.77 % | |
153 | Iran | 6.722 % | |
154 | Guinea-Bissau | 6.691 % | |
155 | Sierra Leone | 6.657 % | |
156 | Tajikistan | 6.592 % | |
157 | British Virgin Islands | 6.574 % | |
158 | Pakistan | 6.507 % | |
159 | Guyana | 6.498 % | |
160 | Nicaragua | 6.444 % | |
161 | Haiti | 6.392 % | |
162 | Cameroon | 6.343 % | |
163 | Malaysia | 6.319 % | |
164 | Solomon Islands | 6.289 % | |
165 | Mali | 6.272 % | |
166 | Laos | 6.268 % | |
167 | Eritrea | 6.211 % | |
168 | French Guiana | 6.19 % | |
169 | Zimbabwe | 6.185 % | |
170 | Equatorial Guinea | 6.136 % | |
171 | Senegal | 6.101 % | |
172 | Benin | 6.079 % | |
173 | Syrian Arab Republic | 6.032 % | |
174 | Kiribati | 5.989 % | |
175 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 5.885 % | |
176 | Bangladesh | 5.868 % | |
177 | Gambia | 5.866 % | |
178 | Mauritania | 5.858 % | |
179 | American Samoa | 5.833 % | |
180 | Libya | 5.829 % | |
181 | Liberia | 5.825 % | |
182 | Ghana | 5.81 % | |
183 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 5.787 % | |
184 | Saint Martin (French part) | 5.784 % | |
185 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 5.738 % | |
186 | Chad | 5.732 % | |
187 | Iraq | 5.709 % | |
188 | Burkina Faso | 5.706 % | |
189 | Togo | 5.706 % | |
190 | Botswana | 5.703 % | |
191 | Nigeria | 5.691 % | |
192 | Yemen | 5.655 % | |
193 | Fiji | 5.646 % | |
194 | Namibia | 5.645 % | |
195 | Congo | 5.62 % | |
196 | Sudan | 5.604 % | |
197 | Mongolia | 5.523 % | |
198 | Djibouti | 5.514 % | |
199 | Honduras | 5.436 % | |
200 | Madagascar | 5.387 % | |
201 | Uganda | 5.334 % | |
202 | Ethiopia | 5.277 % | |
203 | Tanzania | 5.262 % | |
204 | Cambodia | 5.254 % | |
205 | Angola | 5.213 % | |
206 | Philippines | 5.191 % | |
207 | Somalia | 5.178 % | |
208 | Mozambique | 5.144 % | |
209 | Vanuatu | 5.109 % | |
210 | Jordan | 4.842 % | |
211 | Burundi | 4.781 % | |
212 | Afghanistan | 4.755 % | |
213 | South Sudan | 4.699 % | |
214 | Côte d'Ivoire | 4.667 % | |
215 | State of Palestine | 4.621 % | |
216 | Zambia | 4.605 % | |
217 | Niger | 4.498 % | |
218 | Mayotte | 4.433 % | |
219 | Eswatini | 4.405 % | |
220 | Papua New Guinea | 4.401 % | |
221 | Timor-Leste | 4.398 % | |
222 | Rwanda | 4.371 % | |
223 | Western Sahara | 4.368 % | |
224 | Central African Republic | 4.351 % | |
225 | Kenya | 4.27 % | |
226 | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 4.266 % | |
227 | Brunei Darussalam | 4.194 % | |
228 | Oman | 4.119 % | |
229 | Marshall Islands | 4.015 % | |
230 | Saudi Arabia | 3.723 % | |
231 | Bahrain | 3.23 % | |
232 | Nauru | 2.665 % | |
233 | Northern Mariana Islands | 2.296 % | |
234 | Kuwait | 2.277 % | |
235 | United Arab Emirates | 1.734 % | |
236 | Qatar | 1.624 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #236
Qatar
- #235
United Arab Emirates
- #234
Kuwait
- #233
Northern Mariana Islands
- #232
Nauru
- #231
Bahrain
- #230
Saudi Arabia
- #229
Marshall Islands
- #228
Oman
- #227
Brunei Darussalam
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2001, the country with the highest Old-Age Dependency Ratio was the Holy See, with a staggering 42.53%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 5.39% in Madagascar to the maximum observed in the Holy See. The global average Old-Age Dependency Ratio in 2001 stood at 12.46%, offering a snapshot of the demographic pressures facing nations worldwide.
Demographic Drivers of High Dependency Ratios
The Old-Age Dependency Ratio is significantly influenced by demographic factors such as life expectancy and birth rates. Countries with higher ratios, such as Italy (27.52%) and Japan (26.59%), often have higher life expectancies and lower birth rates. These nations typically have well-developed healthcare systems and policies that have historically led to longer lifespans. Conversely, a declining birth rate means fewer young people enter the workforce, increasing the proportion of older dependents. This demographic trend presents a challenge for economic sustainability, as a smaller working-age population supports a growing elderly demographic.
Economic Implications and Policy Responses
Countries with high Old-Age Dependency Ratios face unique economic challenges. For instance, Sweden (26.67%) and Germany (24.90%) must allocate substantial resources to healthcare, pensions, and elder care. This can strain public finances and necessitate policy interventions such as increasing the retirement age or incentivizing higher birth rates. Economic strategies in these nations often focus on sustaining workforce participation and productivity to balance the demographic scales. On the other hand, countries like Madagascar (5.39%) and Honduras (5.44%) benefit from a younger population, which can drive economic growth if effectively harnessed through education and employment opportunities.
Geopolitical and Cultural Influences
Geopolitical and cultural factors also play crucial roles in shaping the Old-Age Dependency Ratio. In Monaco (34.73%) and the Holy See (42.53%), the high ratios can be attributed to the unique demographic compositions influenced by their small populations and specific geopolitical statuses. Cultural attitudes towards family size and elder care can also impact these ratios. For example, in Greece (25.75%), traditional family structures and cultural norms may influence the care and support systems for the elderly, reflecting in the higher dependency ratio.
Contrasting Trends in Developing Nations
In contrast, developing nations such as Nigeria (5.69%) and Yemen (5.65%) exhibit some of the lowest Old-Age Dependency Ratios due to higher birth rates and lower life expectancies. These countries often have larger young populations, which can be an economic boon if coupled with effective policies fostering education and job creation. However, these nations must also prepare for the eventual demographic transition as healthcare improves and life expectancy increases, potentially shifting the dependency dynamics in the future.
Overall, the Old-Age Dependency Ratio in 2001 highlights critical demographic challenges and opportunities across the globe. Countries with high ratios must address the economic implications of an aging population, while those with lower ratios have the potential to harness their youthful demographics for economic development. Understanding these patterns is essential for policymakers aiming to create sustainable economic strategies in the face of shifting demographic landscapes.
Frequently Asked Questions About Old-Age Dependency Ratio in 2001
Which country had the highest old-age dependency ratio in 2001?
The Holy See had the highest old-age dependency ratio in 2001, with a value of 42.53%.
Which country had the lowest old-age dependency ratio in 2001?
Qatar had the lowest old-age dependency ratio in 2001, with a value of 1.62%.
What was the average old-age dependency ratio across all countries in 2001?
The average old-age dependency ratio across all countries in 2001 was 11.21%.
What was the median old-age dependency ratio in 2001?
The median old-age dependency ratio in 2001 was 8.29%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for old-age dependency ratio in 2001?
The top 3 countries for old-age dependency ratio in 2001 were the Holy See (42.53%), Monaco (34.73%), and Italy (27.52%).
What was the range of old-age dependency ratios among countries in 2001?
In 2001, the range of old-age dependency ratios among countries was from 1.62% in Qatar to 42.53% in the Holy See.
Insights by country
China, Hong Kong SAR
In 2001, China, Hong Kong SAR had an Old-Age Dependency Ratio of 15.723694 %, ranking #62 out of 236 countries. This ratio was relatively low compared to many developed nations, reflecting a younger demographic profile in the region. Factors contributing to this statistic include the region's robust economic growth, which has supported a higher working-age population, and effective healthcare policies that have improved life expectancy without a proportional increase in the elderly population.
Ireland
In 2001, Ireland had an Old-Age Dependency Ratio of 16.513937 %, ranking #57 out of 236 countries. This ratio is relatively low compared to many European nations, reflecting a younger population demographic. Contributing factors include Ireland's high birth rates during the late 20th century and significant emigration patterns, which have influenced the age structure of the population.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
In 2001, Bosnia and Herzegovina had an Old-Age Dependency Ratio of 16.481066 %, ranking #58 out of 236 countries. This ratio indicates a relatively moderate level of dependency compared to many European nations, particularly those with aging populations like Italy or Germany. Contributing factors include Bosnia and Herzegovina's demographic trends, where a significant portion of the population is still in the working-age bracket, alongside economic challenges that affect health and social services for the elderly.
Guadeloupe
In 2001, Guadeloupe had an Old-Age Dependency Ratio of 16.070488 %, ranking #60 out of 236 countries. This ratio is relatively low compared to countries like Japan, which has one of the highest dependency ratios globally due to its aging population. The lower ratio in Guadeloupe can be attributed to a younger demographic profile and a relatively stable birth rate, which helps to balance the aging population's impact on the economy.
Afghanistan
In 2001, Afghanistan had an Old-Age Dependency Ratio of 4.7550197 %, ranking #212 out of 236 countries. This low ratio indicates a relatively young population compared to global averages, where many developed nations face higher dependency ratios due to aging demographics. Contributing factors include Afghanistan's prolonged conflict, which has affected population stability, and a high birth rate that skews the demographic towards younger age groups.
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan's Old-Age Dependency Ratio in 2001 was 10.26979 %, ranking it #93 out of 236 countries. This ratio reflects a relatively lower burden of elderly dependents compared to many developed nations, where ratios often exceed 20%. Contributing factors include Kazakhstan's youthful demographic profile and ongoing economic reforms that have fostered a growing labor force, allowing for a more favorable dependency balance.
Benin
In 2001, Benin had an Old-Age Dependency Ratio of 6.0785775 %, ranking #172 out of 236 countries. This figure is significantly lower than many developed nations, reflecting a younger population structure. Contributing factors include a high birth rate and a lower life expectancy compared to global averages, which indicates that a smaller proportion of the population is elderly and reliant on the working-age population for support.
Mali
Mali's Old-Age Dependency Ratio in 2001 was 6.2719235 %, ranking it #165 out of 236 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a relatively young population compared to many developed nations. Contributing factors include Mali's high fertility rates and a predominantly youthful demographic structure, which reflects ongoing economic challenges and limited access to healthcare that impacts longevity.
Greenland
In 2001, Greenland had an Old-Age Dependency Ratio of 7.5842915 %, ranking #133 out of 236 countries. This ratio is notably lower than many European nations, which often experience higher dependency ratios due to aging populations. The relatively low figure in Greenland can be attributed to its youthful demographic profile and a smaller elderly population, influenced by migration patterns and limited healthcare access in remote areas.
Albania
In 2001, Albania had an Old-Age Dependency Ratio of 11.996258 %, ranking #80 out of 236 countries. This figure is relatively low compared to many European nations, reflecting a younger population structure. Factors contributing to this ratio include Albania's historical emigration patterns and a relatively high birth rate during the late 20th century, which have influenced its demographic profile.
Data Source
Old-age dependency ratio | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive statistical data and visualizations on global development issues. The old-age dependency ratio dataset specifically offers insights into the ratio of older dependents to the working-age population across various countries.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Old-Age Dependency Ratio data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data