Independence 2006
Independence measures a country's self-governance. Compare global rankings, explore interactive maps, and analyze historical trends.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
- #1
Aruba
- #2
China
- #3
Andorra
- #4
Azerbaijan
- #5
Barbados
- #6
Botswana
- #7
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #8
Albania
- #9
Djibouti
- #10
Belarus
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #216
Samoa
- #215
Wallis and Futuna Islands
- #214
British Virgin Islands
- #213
Uzbekistan
- #212
United Kingdom
- #211
Tuvalu
- #210
Iran
- #209
Iceland
- #208
Haiti
- #207
Guinea
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2006, Japan led the world in the measure of Independence with a value of 660, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 1.00 to a maximum of 660.00. The global average for Independence in 2006 was 27.93, providing a benchmark for understanding how countries compare in terms of self-governance.
Top Performers in Independence
The data for 2006 reveals a significant disparity in the levels of Independence among countries, with Japan at the forefront with a score of 660. This high level of Independence can be attributed to Japan's robust economic infrastructure, technological advancement, and stable political environment. Following Japan, France recorded a value of 486, reflecting its strong centralized government and influential global role, particularly within the European Union. China, with a score of 221, showcases a different model of Independence, driven by its rapid economic growth and increasing global influence.
Other notable countries in the top ten include Luxembourg (183) and Greece (182). Luxembourg's high score can be understood through its strong financial sector and diplomatic influence in Europe. Greece's position reflects its historical emphasis on sovereignty and national identity, despite economic challenges.
Understanding the Lowest Scores
At the other end of the spectrum, several countries share the lowest possible score of 1, including Slovakia, Australia, Uzbekistan, and Switzerland. These low scores may not necessarily indicate a lack of self-governance but could reflect the methodological nuances of how Independence is measured, possibly taking into account external dependencies or international engagements. For instance, Switzerland, despite its renowned neutrality and self-sufficiency, participates in numerous international agreements that might affect its score.
Similarly, Australia and Slovakia maintain strong international ties through organizations like the United Nations and regional alliances, which could contribute to their lower scores despite their robust democratic institutions.
Factors Influencing Independence
Several factors can influence a country's level of Independence, including economic strength, geopolitical stability, and historical context. For example, Japan's high score reflects its economic independence and minimal reliance on foreign aid. In contrast, countries with lower scores, such as Tuvalu and Benin, might be more dependent on international aid and external support due to their smaller economies and developmental challenges.
Geopolitical factors also play a crucial role. Countries like Iran and Brunei Darussalam, despite having significant natural resources, might score lower due to international sanctions or reliance on a limited range of exports, affecting their overall Independence.
Year-over-Year Trends and Changes
The year-over-year analysis indicates a general decrease in the average Independence score by -0.54 or -0.5%. Notably, Austria experienced the most substantial decline, dropping by 98.00 points or -85.2%. This sharp decrease could be attributed to changes in its political landscape or increased integration within the European Union, affecting its perceived self-governance.
In contrast, top-ranking countries like Japan, France, and China saw no change in their scores, indicating stability in their levels of Independence. This stability could reflect consistent economic performance and political stability, reinforcing their positions as global leaders in self-governance.
Overall, the 2006 data on Independence highlights the complex interplay of economic, political, and historical factors that shape a country's ability to self-govern. While some countries maintain high levels of Independence, others face challenges that influence their scores, offering insights into global governance dynamics.
Data Source
CIA World Factbook
The World Factbook, also known as the CIA World Factbook, was a reference resource produced by the US Central Intelligence Agency between 1962 and 2026 with almanac-style information about the countries of the world. From 1971 it was not classified, and available to the public in print since 1975, initially by the CIA, and later the Government Publishing Office.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Independence data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data