Government Health Expenditure Per Capita 2005
Government health expenditure per capita measures the average spending on health services per person in a country.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | United States | 6,428.602 USD | |
2 | Monaco | 5,878.007 USD | |
3 | Luxembourg | 5,818.146 USD | |
4 | Switzerland | 5,661.174 USD | |
5 | Norway | 5,584.689 USD | |
6 | Iceland | 5,079.689 USD | |
7 | Denmark | 4,436.074 USD | |
8 | Ireland | 3,938.191 USD | |
9 | Netherlands | 3,823.481 USD | |
10 | Austria | 3,720.024 USD | |
11 | France | 3,575.025 USD | |
12 | Sweden | 3,546.787 USD | |
13 | Germany | 3,544.566 USD | |
14 | United Kingdom | 3,528.162 USD | |
15 | Belgium | 3,415.646 USD | |
16 | Canada | 3,268.469 USD | |
17 | Finland | 3,236.858 USD | |
18 | San Marino | 3,055.632 USD | |
19 | Australia | 2,995.873 USD | |
20 | Japan | 2,892.605 USD | |
21 | Italy | 2,669.728 USD | |
22 | New Zealand | 2,295.372 USD | |
23 | Andorra | 2,279.531 USD | |
24 | Spain | 2,074.331 USD | |
25 | Greece | 1,935.268 USD | |
26 | Portugal | 1,814.354 USD | |
27 | Israel | 1,509.106 USD | |
28 | Slovenia | 1,449.189 USD | |
29 | Qatar | 1,386.016 USD | |
30 | Malta | 1,378.239 USD | |
31 | Cyprus | 1,366.017 USD | |
32 | Bahamas | 1,153.216 USD | |
33 | Barbados | 963.078 USD | |
34 | South Korea | 944.551 USD | |
35 | Singapore | 908.376 USD | |
36 | United Arab Emirates | 898.365 USD | |
37 | Hungary | 895.203 USD | |
38 | Czech Republic | 852.652 USD | |
39 | Palau | 810.104 USD | |
40 | Kuwait | 727.254 USD | |
41 | Croatia | 726.611 USD | |
42 | Brunei Darussalam | 657.319 USD | |
43 | Antigua and Barbuda | 641.316 USD | |
44 | Slovakia | 601.313 USD | |
45 | Bahrain | 557.957 USD | |
46 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 556.972 USD | |
47 | Estonia | 549.63 USD | |
48 | Saudi Arabia | 545.736 USD | |
49 | Trinidad and Tobago | 530.352 USD | |
50 | Chile | 495.56 USD | |
51 | Marshall Islands | 490.599 USD | |
52 | Mexico | 483.98 USD | |
53 | Poland | 465.7 USD | |
54 | Seychelles | 457.771 USD | |
55 | Uruguay | 445.282 USD | |
56 | Latvia | 440.81 USD | |
57 | Lithuania | 438.933 USD | |
58 | Namibia | 402.201 USD | |
59 | South Africa | 400.536 USD | |
60 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 397.916 USD | |
61 | Argentina | 395.646 USD | |
62 | Brazil | 387.931 USD | |
63 | Turkey | 357.402 USD | |
64 | Lebanon | 347.403 USD | |
65 | Maldives | 335.138 USD | |
66 | Saint Lucia | 333.374 USD | |
67 | Cuba | 331.504 USD | |
68 | Nauru | 328.928 USD | |
69 | Oman | 326.91 USD | |
70 | Grenada | 326.092 USD | |
71 | Turkmenistan | 324.812 USD | |
72 | Panama | 323.051 USD | |
73 | Costa Rica | 313.484 USD | |
74 | Serbia | 307.547 USD | |
75 | Botswana | 281.388 USD | |
76 | Russia | 270.144 USD | |
77 | Bulgaria | 267.741 USD | |
78 | Dominica | 263.661 USD | |
79 | Romania | 254.53 USD | |
80 | Jamaica | 243.578 USD | |
81 | Suriname | 241.684 USD | |
82 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 241.64 USD | |
83 | Tuvalu | 232.033 USD | |
84 | North Macedonia | 229.812 USD | |
85 | El Salvador | 225.174 USD | |
86 | Eswatini | 217.261 USD | |
87 | Libya | 209.878 USD | |
88 | Colombia | 209.683 USD | |
89 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 197.632 USD | |
90 | Belarus | 196.138 USD | |
91 | Mauritius | 192.139 USD | |
92 | Gabon | 188.914 USD | |
93 | Jordan | 185.03 USD | |
94 | Belize | 181.246 USD | |
95 | Ecuador | 170.442 USD | |
96 | Tunisia | 169.846 USD | |
97 | Iran | 169.815 USD | |
98 | Dominican Republic | 168.858 USD | |
99 | Malaysia | 162.177 USD | |
100 | State of Palestine | 158.43 USD | |
101 | Albania | 149.975 USD | |
102 | Kazakhstan | 139.579 USD | |
103 | Guatemala | 132.419 USD | |
104 | Georgia | 132.225 USD | |
105 | Kiribati | 131.886 USD | |
106 | Peru | 123.254 USD | |
107 | Equatorial Guinea | 122.755 USD | |
108 | Samoa | 121.242 USD | |
109 | Fiji | 120.211 USD | |
110 | Ukraine | 114.633 USD | |
111 | Tonga | 108.293 USD | |
112 | Algeria | 100.837 USD | |
113 | Honduras | 97.864 USD | |
114 | Morocco | 97.197 USD | |
115 | Cabo Verde | 96.089 USD | |
116 | Armenia | 95.551 USD | |
117 | Paraguay | 95.181 USD | |
118 | Thailand | 90.611 USD | |
119 | Solomon Islands | 89.026 USD | |
120 | Guyana | 85.357 USD | |
121 | Sao Tome and Principe | 80.131 USD | |
122 | Republic of Moldova | 79.332 USD | |
123 | Nicaragua | 73.657 USD | |
124 | China | 73.003 USD | |
125 | Comoros | 67.801 USD | |
126 | Syrian Arab Republic | 62.293 USD | |
127 | Vanuatu | 61.934 USD | |
128 | Egypt | 59.468 USD | |
129 | Sri Lanka | 55.4 USD | |
130 | Angola | 54.661 USD | |
131 | Iraq | 53.055 USD | |
132 | Nigeria | 52.243 USD | |
133 | Bolivia | 51.762 USD | |
134 | Bhutan | 46.794 USD | |
135 | Côte d'Ivoire | 46.694 USD | |
136 | Philippines | 45.676 USD | |
137 | Djibouti | 45.126 USD | |
138 | Zambia | 44.996 USD | |
139 | Cameroon | 43.108 USD | |
140 | Lesotho | 41.667 USD | |
141 | Vietnam | 38.97 USD | |
142 | Ghana | 38.517 USD | |
143 | Yemen | 38.27 USD | |
144 | Mongolia | 38.043 USD | |
145 | Sudan | 37.075 USD | |
146 | Senegal | 36.006 USD | |
147 | Kyrgyzstan | 34.937 USD | |
148 | Azerbaijan | 34.352 USD | |
149 | Indonesia | 34.098 USD | |
150 | Mauritania | 34.005 USD | |
151 | Gambia | 33.204 USD | |
152 | Uzbekistan | 32.513 USD | |
153 | Cambodia | 32.337 USD | |
154 | Chad | 31.276 USD | |
155 | Kenya | 30.994 USD | |
156 | Congo | 30.903 USD | |
157 | Tanzania | 27.714 USD | |
158 | India | 27.498 USD | |
159 | Papua New Guinea | 27.497 USD | |
160 | Sierra Leone | 26.049 USD | |
161 | Uganda | 25.868 USD | |
162 | Timor-Leste | 25.725 USD | |
163 | Haiti | 25.259 USD | |
164 | Benin | 25.125 USD | |
165 | Afghanistan | 25.114 USD | |
166 | Rwanda | 25.021 USD | |
167 | Mali | 23.974 USD | |
168 | Eritrea | 21.927 USD | |
169 | Burkina Faso | 21.343 USD | |
170 | Guinea-Bissau | 20.999 USD | |
171 | Togo | 20.97 USD | |
172 | Guinea | 19.664 USD | |
173 | Pakistan | 19.59 USD | |
174 | Liberia | 19.146 USD | |
175 | Niger | 18.671 USD | |
176 | Mozambique | 18.407 USD | |
177 | Tajikistan | 17.385 USD | |
178 | Laos | 17.331 USD | |
179 | Malawi | 17.24 USD | |
180 | Madagascar | 15.95 USD | |
181 | Nepal | 14.147 USD | |
182 | Central African Republic | 13.935 USD | |
183 | Bangladesh | 11.314 USD | |
184 | Burundi | 11.131 USD | |
185 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 8.551 USD | |
186 | Myanmar | 7.653 USD | |
187 | Ethiopia | 6.482 USD |
- #1
United States
- #2
Monaco
- #3
Luxembourg
- #4
Switzerland
- #5
Norway
- #6
Iceland
- #7
Denmark
- #8
Ireland
- #9
Netherlands
- #10
Austria
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #187
Ethiopia
- #186
Myanmar
- #185
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #184
Burundi
- #183
Bangladesh
- #182
Central African Republic
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Madagascar
- #179
Malawi
- #178
Laos
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2005, the United States led the world in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita with a substantial spending of USD 6428.60, while the global range spanned from a mere USD 6.48 to this high mark. The average expenditure across the 187 countries with available data was USD 731.75, providing a benchmark for understanding disparities in health funding worldwide.
Economic Prosperity and Health Expenditure
The data reveals a strong correlation between a country's economic wealth and its health expenditure per capita. Monaco, Luxembourg, and Switzerland follow the United States with expenditures of USD 5878.01, USD 5818.15, and USD 5661.17 respectively. These nations boast high GDP per capita, enabling substantial investment in healthcare. Such financial capacity allows for comprehensive health services and robust public health infrastructures, which are essential for sustaining high living standards.
Conversely, countries like Ethiopia and Myanmar, with expenditures of only USD 6.48 and USD 7.65 respectively, highlight the challenges faced by nations with limited economic resources. These low figures often reflect constrained government budgets and competing priorities that limit public health investment.
Policy Influences on Health Spending
Government policy plays a critical role in determining health expenditure levels. For instance, Norway and Iceland, spending USD 5584.69 and USD 5079.69 per capita respectively, benefit from policies that prioritize universal healthcare coverage. Such frameworks ensure that a significant portion of national budgets is allocated to health services, reflecting a societal commitment to health as a public good.
On the other end, countries like the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Burundi, with expenditures of USD 8.55 and USD 11.13, often lack the institutional structures and policy frameworks necessary for significant health investment. In these contexts, external aid and non-governmental organizations frequently supplement government spending.
Year-over-Year Changes in Expenditure
Analyzing year-over-year changes, Iceland experienced the largest increase in government health expenditure per capita, rising by USD 665.46, a 15.1% increase. This significant growth can be attributed to a strong economic performance and increasing governmental focus on healthcare improvements. Similarly, Norway and Ireland saw increases of USD 487.34 and USD 455.03 respectively, reflecting similar economic and policy-driven enhancements in health funding.
However, some countries experienced decreases, such as Panama and Lebanon, with reductions of USD 21.36 and USD 20.61. These declines may be indicative of economic constraints or shifts in government priorities away from health spending.
Regional Disparities and Their Implications
The data underscores significant regional disparities in health expenditure. High-income regions, particularly in North America and Western Europe, consistently show higher per capita spending. These regions benefit from well-established healthcare systems and economic stability, allowing governments to allocate substantial resources to health.
In contrast, Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Southeast Asia face significant challenges. Countries like Malawi and Laos, with expenditures of USD 17.24 and USD 17.33, exemplify regions where limited resources and high disease burden necessitate increased international support and innovative policy solutions to improve health outcomes.
Understanding these disparities is crucial for global health strategies, as they highlight areas where international aid and policy interventions can be most impactful.
Frequently Asked Questions About Government Health Expenditure Per Capita in 2005
Which country had the highest government health expenditure per capita in 2005?
The United States had the highest government health expenditure per capita in 2005, with 6,429 USD.
What was the average government health expenditure per capita across all countries in 2005?
The average government health expenditure per capita across all countries in 2005 was 732 USD.
Which country had the lowest government health expenditure per capita in 2005?
Ethiopia had the lowest government health expenditure per capita in 2005, with 6.48 USD.
What was the median government health expenditure per capita in 2005?
The median government health expenditure per capita in 2005 was 181 USD.
What are the top three countries in government health expenditure per capita in 2005?
The top three countries in government health expenditure per capita in 2005 were the United States (6,429 USD), Monaco (5,878 USD), and Luxembourg (5,818 USD).
What is the range of government health expenditure per capita among the countries in 2005?
The range of government health expenditure per capita among the countries in 2005 spans from 6.48 USD in Ethiopia to 6,429 USD in the United States.
Insights by country
Denmark
In 2005, Denmark ranked #7 globally in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 4436.07421875 USD. This figure is significantly above the global average, reflecting Denmark's commitment to universal healthcare. Key drivers include a robust welfare state, high taxation levels, and a strong emphasis on public health policies, which collectively ensure comprehensive healthcare access for its citizens.
China
In 2005, China ranked #124 globally in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 73.00266266 USD. This figure is significantly lower than many of its neighbors, reflecting a broader trend of underinvestment in healthcare compared to countries like Japan or South Korea. Key drivers behind this expenditure include China's rapid economic growth during this period, which prioritized infrastructure over health spending, and a large population that places immense pressure on the healthcare system.
Equatorial Guinea
In 2005, Equatorial Guinea's Government Health Expenditure Per Capita was 122.75533295 USD, ranking #107 out of 187 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating limited investment in public health compared to wealthier nations. The country's relatively high oil revenues have not translated into proportional health spending, largely due to governance issues and a lack of infrastructure development in the healthcare sector.
Afghanistan
In 2005, Afghanistan ranked #165 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 25.11388779 USD. This expenditure is significantly lower than many of its neighbors, reflecting the challenges faced by the country in terms of health infrastructure and funding. Factors contributing to this low expenditure include ongoing conflict, limited economic resources, and a lack of stable governance, which hinder effective health policy implementation.
Albania
In 2005, Albania ranked #101 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 149.97515869 USD. This amount is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in healthcare funding compared to higher-ranked countries. The relatively low expenditure is influenced by Albania's transitional economy, which has struggled with limited resources and investment in public health infrastructure since the fall of communism.
Ecuador
In 2005, Ecuador ranked #95 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, spending 170.44190979 USD per individual. This figure is below the global average, reflecting challenges in public health funding compared to higher-ranked countries. Contributing factors include Ecuador's economic constraints and a focus on other developmental priorities, which impact overall health investment. Additionally, the country's diverse geography complicates healthcare delivery, particularly in rural areas.
Canada
In 2005, Canada ranked #16 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, spending 3268.46850586 USD per person. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Canada's commitment to publicly funded healthcare. Contributing to this expenditure are Canada's universal healthcare system and a strong emphasis on health services, driven by its aging population and diverse demographic needs.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan ranked #148 globally in 2005 for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita at 34.35204697 USD. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating limited public investment in health compared to wealthier nations. Contributing factors include Azerbaijan's economic transition post-Soviet Union and ongoing challenges in public health infrastructure, which have affected overall health spending.
Sweden
In 2005, Sweden ranked #12 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita at 3546.78686523 USD. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Sweden's commitment to universal healthcare. Key drivers include the country's strong welfare state model and high taxation levels, which fund comprehensive health services for its citizens.
Libya
In 2005, Libya had a Government Health Expenditure Per Capita of 209.878479 USD, ranking #87 out of 187 countries. This expenditure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by Libya in its healthcare funding compared to more developed nations. Factors such as ongoing political instability and economic sanctions have historically impacted Libya's ability to allocate sufficient resources for health services, affecting overall public health outcomes.
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde ranked #115 in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita in 2005, with a value of 96.08917999 USD. This expenditure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in healthcare funding compared to wealthier nations. Factors influencing this statistic include Cabo Verde's limited natural resources and reliance on tourism, which can affect government revenue and, consequently, health investments.
Cuba
Cuba ranked #67 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita in 2005, with a value of 331.50354004 USD. This expenditure is notable compared to the global average, reflecting Cuba's commitment to healthcare despite economic challenges. The country’s extensive public health system is driven by a focus on preventive care and a strong emphasis on education, which has historically prioritized health outcomes over economic factors.
Angola
In 2005, Angola ranked #130 globally with a Government Health Expenditure Per Capita of 54.66142273 USD. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the country's ongoing challenges in health funding compared to wealthier nations. Factors such as Angola's post-civil war recovery, economic instability, and reliance on oil revenues have constrained public health investments, impacting overall healthcare accessibility and quality.
Congo
In 2005, Congo ranked #156 globally with a Government Health Expenditure Per Capita of 30.90304375 USD. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the country's ongoing challenges in healthcare funding. Factors contributing to this low expenditure include economic instability, limited government resources, and a lack of infrastructure, which hinder effective health service delivery.
Rwanda
In 2005, Rwanda ranked #166 globally with a Government Health Expenditure Per Capita of 25.02086639 USD. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the country's challenges in healthcare funding compared to wealthier nations. The low expenditure can be attributed to Rwanda's economic constraints following the 1994 genocide, which devastated its infrastructure and human resources, necessitating ongoing recovery efforts in public health and economic development.
Belarus
In 2005, Belarus ranked #90 globally with a Government Health Expenditure Per Capita of 196.13806152 USD. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by the country's healthcare system compared to more developed nations. Economic constraints and a centralized healthcare policy have limited investment in health services, impacting the overall quality and accessibility of care for the population.
Senegal
In 2005, Senegal ranked #146 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 36.00606155 USD. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the country's ongoing challenges in healthcare funding compared to wealthier nations. Limited economic resources, coupled with a high prevalence of infectious diseases, have constrained Senegal's ability to invest more in health services.
Data Source
Current health expenditure per capita (current US$)
The World Bank provides comprehensive data on current health expenditure per capita in current US dollars, offering insights into health financing across countries. This dataset allows for comparisons of health spending on a per-person basis, facilitating analysis of health system investments globally.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Government Health Expenditure Per Capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.