Government Health Expenditure Per Capita 2001
Government health expenditure per capita measures the average spending on health services per person in a country.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | United States | 4,901.675 USD | |
2 | Switzerland | 3,751.752 USD | |
3 | Luxembourg | 3,109.201 USD | |
4 | Norway | 3,099.003 USD | |
5 | Monaco | 3,050.577 USD | |
6 | Denmark | 2,597.973 USD | |
7 | Iceland | 2,528.546 USD | |
8 | Japan | 2,488.652 USD | |
9 | Germany | 2,338.122 USD | |
10 | Austria | 2,315.423 USD | |
11 | San Marino | 2,202.078 USD | |
12 | France | 2,192.716 USD | |
13 | Netherlands | 2,175.73 USD | |
14 | Sweden | 2,154.634 USD | |
15 | United Kingdom | 2,074.599 USD | |
16 | Canada | 2,041.875 USD | |
17 | Belgium | 1,879.935 USD | |
18 | Ireland | 1,823.735 USD | |
19 | Finland | 1,810.404 USD | |
20 | Italy | 1,586.673 USD | |
21 | Australia | 1,550.374 USD | |
22 | Israel | 1,509.445 USD | |
23 | Andorra | 1,378.708 USD | |
24 | New Zealand | 1,053.736 USD | |
25 | Spain | 1,045.051 USD | |
26 | Portugal | 1,015.55 USD | |
27 | Greece | 1,004.815 USD | |
28 | Bahamas | 995.718 USD | |
29 | Slovenia | 826.226 USD | |
30 | Cyprus | 782.162 USD | |
31 | Singapore | 690.013 USD | |
32 | United Arab Emirates | 689.293 USD | |
33 | Malta | 685.984 USD | |
34 | Uruguay | 679.423 USD | |
35 | Argentina | 660.634 USD | |
36 | Barbados | 643.116 USD | |
37 | Palau | 640.584 USD | |
38 | Qatar | 598.736 USD | |
39 | Antigua and Barbuda | 572.208 USD | |
40 | Kuwait | 553.751 USD | |
41 | South Korea | 503.158 USD | |
42 | Saudi Arabia | 482.104 USD | |
43 | Brunei Darussalam | 474.117 USD | |
44 | Bahrain | 457.597 USD | |
45 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 440.216 USD | |
46 | Lebanon | 416.575 USD | |
47 | Czech Republic | 388.544 USD | |
48 | Croatia | 387.813 USD | |
49 | Mexico | 364.397 USD | |
50 | Hungary | 359.698 USD | |
51 | Nauru | 349.017 USD | |
52 | Seychelles | 334.483 USD | |
53 | Chile | 323.633 USD | |
54 | Panama | 296.751 USD | |
55 | Saint Lucia | 285.049 USD | |
56 | Poland | 282.821 USD | |
57 | Trinidad and Tobago | 272.729 USD | |
58 | Brazil | 271.561 USD | |
59 | Grenada | 271.038 USD | |
60 | Marshall Islands | 269.221 USD | |
61 | Tuvalu | 261.71 USD | |
62 | Oman | 259.591 USD | |
63 | Costa Rica | 258.001 USD | |
64 | Libya | 255.771 USD | |
65 | Dominica | 231.523 USD | |
66 | Maldives | 229.8 USD | |
67 | Lithuania | 218.818 USD | |
68 | Estonia | 214.704 USD | |
69 | Slovakia | 212.222 USD | |
70 | Latvia | 205.02 USD | |
71 | Botswana | 203.012 USD | |
72 | South Africa | 202.811 USD | |
73 | Namibia | 201.469 USD | |
74 | Cuba | 198.499 USD | |
75 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 181.29 USD | |
76 | Jamaica | 180.661 USD | |
77 | Belize | 163.112 USD | |
78 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 162.934 USD | |
79 | El Salvador | 162.305 USD | |
80 | Jordan | 161.339 USD | |
81 | North Macedonia | 150.431 USD | |
82 | Turkey | 148.862 USD | |
83 | Dominican Republic | 143.325 USD | |
84 | Colombia | 138.476 USD | |
85 | State of Palestine | 127.379 USD | |
86 | Gabon | 120.902 USD | |
87 | Turkmenistan | 120.846 USD | |
88 | Bulgaria | 119.83 USD | |
89 | Russia | 117.878 USD | |
90 | Mauritius | 116.361 USD | |
91 | Malaysia | 114.917 USD | |
92 | Tunisia | 114.005 USD | |
93 | Serbia | 112.198 USD | |
94 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 105.11 USD | |
95 | Guatemala | 100.02 USD | |
96 | Iran | 93.23 USD | |
97 | Paraguay | 91.844 USD | |
98 | Suriname | 91.738 USD | |
99 | Peru | 89.366 USD | |
100 | Kiribati | 85.888 USD | |
101 | Romania | 78.818 USD | |
102 | Eswatini | 75.413 USD | |
103 | Albania | 73.922 USD | |
104 | Belarus | 73.366 USD | |
105 | Ecuador | 72.792 USD | |
106 | Egypt | 68.673 USD | |
107 | Honduras | 67.137 USD | |
108 | Algeria | 67.059 USD | |
109 | Cabo Verde | 63.558 USD | |
110 | Fiji | 61.499 USD | |
111 | Solomon Islands | 60.233 USD | |
112 | Guyana | 60.099 USD | |
113 | Syrian Arab Republic | 57.71 USD | |
114 | Nicaragua | 57.691 USD | |
115 | Thailand | 57.194 USD | |
116 | Morocco | 56.554 USD | |
117 | Georgia | 56.368 USD | |
118 | Samoa | 56.097 USD | |
119 | Gambia | 55.65 USD | |
120 | Tonga | 55.277 USD | |
121 | Kazakhstan | 49.367 USD | |
122 | Sao Tome and Principe | 47.148 USD | |
123 | Vanuatu | 45.735 USD | |
124 | Comoros | 45.346 USD | |
125 | Bolivia | 44.882 USD | |
126 | China | 44.36 USD | |
127 | Ukraine | 44.143 USD | |
128 | Sri Lanka | 39.872 USD | |
129 | Bhutan | 35.089 USD | |
130 | Djibouti | 33.614 USD | |
131 | Armenia | 31.907 USD | |
132 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 30.584 USD | |
133 | Uzbekistan | 30.463 USD | |
134 | Cameroon | 29.823 USD | |
135 | Equatorial Guinea | 29.592 USD | |
136 | Angola | 29.261 USD | |
137 | Lesotho | 28.221 USD | |
138 | Mongolia | 27.852 USD | |
139 | Philippines | 27.61 USD | |
140 | Haiti | 27.393 USD | |
141 | Vietnam | 25.555 USD | |
142 | Republic of Moldova | 25.399 USD | |
143 | Yemen | 24.092 USD | |
144 | Senegal | 23.459 USD | |
145 | Mauritania | 23.282 USD | |
146 | Cambodia | 22.183 USD | |
147 | Kenya | 22.115 USD | |
148 | Guinea | 21.769 USD | |
149 | Congo | 20.304 USD | |
150 | India | 19.744 USD | |
151 | Sierra Leone | 19.32 USD | |
152 | Azerbaijan | 19.19 USD | |
153 | Zambia | 18.95 USD | |
154 | Papua New Guinea | 18.198 USD | |
155 | Nigeria | 17.961 USD | |
156 | Indonesia | 16.873 USD | |
157 | Benin | 16.27 USD | |
158 | Uganda | 15.996 USD | |
159 | Sudan | 15.184 USD | |
160 | Tanzania | 15.174 USD | |
161 | Eritrea | 14.907 USD | |
162 | Laos | 14.467 USD | |
163 | Guinea-Bissau | 13.507 USD | |
164 | Pakistan | 13.416 USD | |
165 | Mali | 13.159 USD | |
166 | Madagascar | 13.139 USD | |
167 | Togo | 13.043 USD | |
168 | Kyrgyzstan | 12.878 USD | |
169 | Ghana | 12.151 USD | |
170 | Chad | 11.64 USD | |
171 | Burkina Faso | 10.275 USD | |
172 | Nepal | 10.269 USD | |
173 | Niger | 9.681 USD | |
174 | Central African Republic | 9.21 USD | |
175 | Mozambique | 8.537 USD | |
176 | Bangladesh | 8.1 USD | |
177 | Rwanda | 7.867 USD | |
178 | Tajikistan | 7.566 USD | |
179 | Burundi | 7.508 USD | |
180 | Malawi | 7.425 USD | |
181 | Liberia | 6.463 USD | |
182 | Ethiopia | 5.51 USD | |
183 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 5.434 USD | |
184 | Myanmar | 4.627 USD |
- #1
United States
- #2
Switzerland
- #3
Luxembourg
- #4
Norway
- #5
Monaco
- #6
Denmark
- #7
Iceland
- #8
Japan
- #9
Germany
- #10
Austria
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #184
Myanmar
- #183
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #182
Ethiopia
- #181
Liberia
- #180
Malawi
- #179
Burundi
- #178
Tajikistan
- #177
Rwanda
- #176
Bangladesh
- #175
Mozambique
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2001, the United States led the world in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita with a staggering USD 4901.68. The global range for this metric spanned from a low of USD 4.63 in Myanmar to the US high, highlighting significant disparities in health spending across nations. The global average expenditure per capita stood at USD 456.72, while the median was USD 114.00, illustrating the skewed distribution driven by high spenders.
Economic Wealth and Health Spending
The correlation between a country's economic status and its health expenditure is evident in the data. High-income countries such as the United States, Switzerland (USD 3751.75), and Luxembourg (USD 3109.20) dominate the top of the expenditure list. These nations have robust economies that can sustain high levels of public spending on health services. The capacity to allocate significant resources to healthcare systems results in better infrastructure, advanced medical technology, and comprehensive healthcare services, contributing to the high per capita spending.
Conversely, countries with lower economic development, such as Myanmar (USD 4.63) and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (USD 5.43), are at the bottom of the list. These nations struggle with limited financial resources, which constrains their ability to invest in health infrastructure and services. The economic challenges in these regions often result in a reliance on international aid and non-governmental organizations to supplement health services, which can lead to inconsistent health expenditure reporting and planning.
Policy Prioritization and Health Investment
Government policies play a crucial role in determining health expenditure per capita. Countries like Denmark (USD 2597.97) and Norway (USD 3099.00) have long-standing traditions of prioritizing social welfare, including healthcare. These nations typically allocate a significant portion of their GDP to health, driven by policy frameworks that emphasize universal healthcare coverage and equal access to medical services.
In contrast, nations such as Bangladesh (USD 8.10) and Mozambique (USD 8.54) often have different policy priorities, focusing on economic development or other critical sectors. This can lead to lower allocations for health services, impacting the overall expenditure per capita. Policy decisions in these countries may also be influenced by external factors such as political stability and governance quality, which can affect the effectiveness and efficiency of health spending.
Geographical and Demographic Influences
Geographical and demographic factors can further influence government health expenditure per capita. Monaco (USD 3050.58), with its small population and high density of wealth, can afford higher per capita spending on health services. The compact size and wealth concentration allow for efficient healthcare delivery and high investment in health infrastructure.
On the other hand, larger countries with significant rural populations, such as Ethiopia (USD 5.51) and Rwanda (USD 7.87), face challenges in reaching remote areas with adequate health services. The costs associated with extending healthcare infrastructure across vast, often inaccessible regions can limit per capita spending. Additionally, these countries may have higher population growth rates, which can dilute the per capita expenditure as resources are stretched to meet the needs of a rapidly increasing population.
Implications of Health Expenditure Disparities
The disparities in government health expenditure per capita have significant implications for global health outcomes. High expenditure countries typically enjoy better health indicators, such as lower mortality rates and higher life expectancy, due to their ability to provide comprehensive healthcare services. In contrast, countries with low health expenditure often face challenges in managing public health crises and providing adequate healthcare, leading to poorer health outcomes.
The data from 2001 underscores the need for targeted international support and policy reforms to address these disparities. Bridging the gap in health expenditure is crucial for achieving global health equity and improving the overall health of populations worldwide. This requires coordinated efforts from governments, international organizations, and the private sector to enhance healthcare access and quality in low-expenditure countries.
Frequently Asked Questions About Government Health Expenditure Per Capita in 2001
Which country had the highest government health expenditure per capita in 2001?
The United States had the highest government health expenditure per capita in 2001, with 4,902 USD.
What was the lowest government health expenditure per capita recorded in 2001?
The lowest government health expenditure per capita in 2001 was recorded in Myanmar, with 4.63 USD.
What was the average government health expenditure per capita across all countries in 2001?
The average government health expenditure per capita across all countries in 2001 was 457 USD.
What was the median government health expenditure per capita in 2001?
The median government health expenditure per capita in 2001 was 113 USD.
Which countries were in the top 10 for government health expenditure per capita in 2001?
The top 10 countries for government health expenditure per capita in 2001 were the United States, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Norway, Monaco, Denmark, Iceland, Japan, Germany, and Austria.
How many countries are included in the dataset for government health expenditure per capita in 2001?
The dataset for government health expenditure per capita in 2001 includes 184 countries.
Insights by country
Paraguay
In 2001, Paraguay ranked #97 globally in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 91.8441391 USD. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by the country's healthcare system compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include Paraguay's relatively low GDP per capita and limited public investment in health services, which impact access to quality healthcare for its population.
Cameroon
In 2001, Cameroon ranked #134 globally in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 29.82297325 USD. This expenditure is significantly lower than the average in Sub-Saharan Africa, indicating challenges in health funding compared to neighboring countries. Contributing factors to this low expenditure include limited economic resources, a high burden of disease, and ongoing political instability, which have hindered substantial investment in the health sector.
Mexico
In 2001, Mexico ranked #49 globally in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 364.39672852 USD. This figure is notably higher than that of several neighboring countries, reflecting Mexico's commitment to expanding health services during this period. Key drivers of this expenditure include economic reforms aimed at improving public health infrastructure and a growing population that necessitated enhanced healthcare access.
Malaysia
In 2001, Malaysia ranked #91 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 114.91710663 USD. This figure is lower than the regional average for Southeast Asia, reflecting challenges in healthcare funding compared to more developed neighbors like Singapore. Contributing factors include Malaysia's relatively moderate economic development and a focus on expanding healthcare access rather than per capita spending, which has shaped its health policy priorities.
Suriname
In 2001, Suriname's Government Health Expenditure Per Capita was 91.73781586 USD, ranking it #98 out of 184 countries. This expenditure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting the country's limited financial resources and economic challenges. Suriname's economy, heavily reliant on natural resources, has faced fluctuations that impact public health funding, while its relatively small population also influences per capita spending levels.
Albania
In 2001, Albania ranked #103 globally in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 73.92171478 USD. This figure is notably lower than many of its European neighbors, reflecting a broader trend of limited healthcare funding in the region. Contributing factors include Albania's transitional economy post-communism, which has historically struggled with resource allocation and investment in public health infrastructure.
Tuvalu
In 2001, Tuvalu ranked #61 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 261.71032715 USD. This figure is notably higher than that of some of its Pacific neighbors, reflecting a commitment to health services in a region where resources can be limited. The relatively high expenditure is driven by Tuvalu's small population and the need to provide adequate healthcare services across its dispersed islands, alongside challenges such as climate change impacting health infrastructure.
Togo
Togo ranked #167 globally in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita in 2001, with a value of 13.04282379 USD. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the country's limited resources compared to wealthier nations. Contributing factors include Togo's economic challenges, a high prevalence of poverty, and a healthcare system that struggles with underfunding and infrastructure deficits.
Angola
In 2001, Angola ranked #136 globally in Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, with a value of 29.26095772 USD. This expenditure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the country's ongoing challenges in health financing. The low per capita spending can be attributed to Angola's post-civil war recovery phase, which limited budget allocations for public health initiatives and infrastructure development.
Grenada
In 2001, Grenada ranked #59 globally for Government Health Expenditure Per Capita, investing 271.03814697 USD per person. This figure is notably higher than many Caribbean neighbors, reflecting a commitment to public health in a region where healthcare access can be uneven. The country's focus on health policy, driven by a small population and a tourism-based economy, allows for targeted investments in healthcare infrastructure and services.
Data Source
Current health expenditure per capita (current US$)
The World Bank provides comprehensive data on current health expenditure per capita in current US dollars, offering insights into health financing across countries. This dataset allows for comparisons of health spending on a per-person basis, facilitating analysis of health system investments globally.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Government Health Expenditure Per Capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.