Electricity from Nuclear Fuels 2016
Electricity from nuclear fuels measures energy production in countries. Compare data, explore rankings, and visualize trends with interactive maps.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
- #1
Hungary
- #2
France
- #3
Slovenia
- #4
Belgium
- #5
South Korea
- #6
Sweden
- #7
Slovakia
- #8
Ukraine
- #9
Czech Republic
- #10
Bulgaria
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #205
Zimbabwe
- #204
Zambia
- #203
Yemen
- #202
Eswatini
- #201
Samoa
- #200
Namibia
- #199
United States Virgin Islands
- #198
Vietnam
- #197
British Virgin Islands
- #196
Venezuela
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2016, Hungary led the world in "Electricity from Nuclear Fuels," achieving a value of 61, while the global range spanned from 0.00 to 61.00. The average value of electricity generation from nuclear fuels across all reporting countries was 2.27, with a median of 0.00, indicating a significant disparity in nuclear energy utilization worldwide.
Global Leaders in Nuclear Energy Utilization
The data from 2016 reveals a distinct pattern in the countries leading in electricity production from nuclear fuels. Hungary topped the list with a value of 61, followed by France at 48.8, and Slovenia at 33.6. This leadership can be attributed to several factors, including robust nuclear energy policies and significant investments in nuclear technology infrastructure. France, for example, has long been a proponent of nuclear energy, with over 70% of its electricity traditionally sourced from nuclear plants, reflecting its commitment to reducing carbon emissions and enhancing energy security.
Similarly, South Korea and Sweden also feature prominently with values of 26.8 and 24.8, respectively. South Korea's heavy investment in nuclear technology and its strategic energy policy have positioned it as a key player in the nuclear energy sector. Meanwhile, Sweden's value reflects its focus on sustainable energy solutions and its historical reliance on nuclear power as a means to achieve energy independence.
Zero Nuclear Energy Utilization
At the other end of the spectrum, several countries reported a value of 0 for electricity from nuclear fuels. These include Bhutan, Solomon Islands, Belarus, and Benin. The absence of nuclear energy in these nations can be attributed to a variety of factors, such as economic constraints, lack of technological infrastructure, and policy decisions favoring other energy sources. For instance, Bhutan's focus on hydropower, which provides a sustainable and abundant energy source, diminishes the need for nuclear energy investment.
In contrast, Belarus has historically been cautious about nuclear energy due to the Chernobyl disaster's impact, despite recent developments towards establishing nuclear power capabilities.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
The year-over-year analysis of electricity from nuclear fuels shows an average increase of 1.46 (or 7.8%). Hungary experienced the most significant increase with a jump of 41.20 (a dramatic 208.1% rise), largely due to the operational enhancement of its Paks Nuclear Power Plant. Slovenia followed with an increase of 13.10 (or 63.9%), reflecting improvements in efficiency and capacity at the Krško Nuclear Power Plant.
Conversely, France and Belgium saw notable decreases of -2.40 and -2.20, respectively. These declines can be linked to policy shifts towards renewable energy sources and the decommissioning of older nuclear reactors. In Japan, a decrease of -1.80 reflects the country's cautious approach to nuclear energy post-Fukushima, emphasizing safety and regulatory compliance over rapid expansion.
Economic and Policy Implications
The disparities in electricity generation from nuclear fuels among countries highlight significant economic and policy implications. Countries with high nuclear energy production, like France and Hungary, benefit from reduced greenhouse gas emissions and increased energy security. However, they also face challenges related to nuclear waste management and public opposition to nuclear energy expansion.
Meanwhile, countries with minimal or no nuclear energy production, such as Bhutan and Benin, often rely on alternative energy sources and may prioritize investments in renewable technologies to meet their growing energy demands sustainably. These choices are shaped by economic capabilities, technological readiness, and policy frameworks that align with national energy goals.
In conclusion, the 2016 data on electricity from nuclear fuels underscores the complex interplay between technological capability, policy decisions, and economic priorities that shape a country's energy landscape. As countries navigate the global energy transition, nuclear energy remains a pivotal yet contentious component of the broader energy mix.
Data Source
CIA World Factbook
The World Factbook, also known as the CIA World Factbook, was a reference resource produced by the US Central Intelligence Agency between 1962 and 2026 with almanac-style information about the countries of the world. From 1971 it was not classified, and available to the public in print since 1975, initially by the CIA, and later the Government Publishing Office.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Electricity from Nuclear Fuels data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Environment Facts
Above-Ground Biomass in Forest (tonnes/ha)
Above-ground biomass in forest measures carbon storage per hectare. Explore rankings and compare data across 266+ countries with interactive maps.
View dataBrowse All Environment
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data