Corruption Perceptions Index Score 2017
Corruption Perceptions Index Score ranks countries on perceived corruption. Higher scores indicate less corruption.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | New Zealand | 89 index | |
2 | Denmark | 88 index | |
3 | Finland | 85 index | |
4 | Norway | 85 index | |
5 | Switzerland | 85 index | |
6 | Singapore | 84 index | |
7 | Sweden | 84 index | |
8 | Canada | 82 index | |
9 | Luxembourg | 82 index | |
10 | Netherlands | 82 index | |
11 | United Kingdom | 82 index | |
12 | Germany | 81 index | |
13 | Australia | 77 index | |
14 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 77 index | |
15 | Iceland | 77 index | |
16 | Austria | 75 index | |
17 | Belgium | 75 index | |
18 | United States | 75 index | |
19 | Ireland | 74 index | |
20 | Japan | 73 index | |
21 | Estonia | 71 index | |
22 | United Arab Emirates | 71 index | |
23 | France | 70 index | |
24 | Uruguay | 70 index | |
25 | Barbados | 68 index | |
26 | Bhutan | 67 index | |
27 | Chile | 67 index | |
28 | Bahamas | 65 index | |
29 | Portugal | 63 index | |
30 | Qatar | 63 index | |
31 | Taiwan | 63 index | |
32 | Brunei Darussalam | 62 index | |
33 | Israel | 62 index | |
34 | Botswana | 61 index | |
35 | Slovenia | 61 index | |
36 | Poland | 60 index | |
37 | Seychelles | 60 index | |
38 | Costa Rica | 59 index | |
39 | Lithuania | 59 index | |
40 | Latvia | 58 index | |
41 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 58 index | |
42 | Cyprus | 57 index | |
43 | Czech Republic | 57 index | |
44 | Dominica | 57 index | |
45 | Spain | 57 index | |
46 | Georgia | 56 index | |
47 | Malta | 56 index | |
48 | Cabo Verde | 55 index | |
49 | Rwanda | 55 index | |
50 | Saint Lucia | 55 index | |
51 | South Korea | 54 index | |
52 | Grenada | 52 index | |
53 | Namibia | 51 index | |
54 | Italy | 50 index | |
55 | Mauritius | 50 index | |
56 | Slovakia | 50 index | |
57 | Croatia | 49 index | |
58 | Saudi Arabia | 49 index | |
59 | Greece | 48 index | |
60 | Jordan | 48 index | |
61 | Romania | 48 index | |
62 | Cuba | 47 index | |
63 | Malaysia | 47 index | |
64 | Montenegro | 46 index | |
65 | Sao Tome and Principe | 46 index | |
66 | Hungary | 45 index | |
67 | Senegal | 45 index | |
68 | Belarus | 44 index | |
69 | Jamaica | 44 index | |
70 | Oman | 44 index | |
71 | Bulgaria | 43 index | |
72 | South Africa | 43 index | |
73 | Vanuatu | 43 index | |
74 | Burkina Faso | 42 index | |
75 | Lesotho | 42 index | |
76 | Tunisia | 42 index | |
77 | China | 41 index | |
78 | Serbia | 41 index | |
79 | Suriname | 41 index | |
80 | Trinidad and Tobago | 41 index | |
81 | Ghana | 40 index | |
82 | India | 40 index | |
83 | Morocco | 40 index | |
84 | Turkey | 40 index | |
85 | Argentina | 39 index | |
86 | Benin | 39 index | |
87 | Eswatini | 39 index | |
88 | Kuwait | 39 index | |
89 | Solomon Islands | 39 index | |
90 | Albania | 38 index | |
91 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 38 index | |
92 | Timor-Leste | 38 index | |
93 | Guyana | 38 index | |
94 | Sri Lanka | 38 index | |
95 | Brazil | 37 index | |
96 | Colombia | 37 index | |
97 | Indonesia | 37 index | |
98 | Panama | 37 index | |
99 | Peru | 37 index | |
100 | Thailand | 37 index | |
101 | Zambia | 37 index | |
102 | Bahrain | 36 index | |
103 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 36 index | |
104 | Mongolia | 36 index | |
105 | Tanzania | 36 index | |
106 | Armenia | 35 index | |
107 | Ethiopia | 35 index | |
108 | North Macedonia | 35 index | |
109 | Vietnam | 35 index | |
110 | Philippines | 34 index | |
111 | Algeria | 33 index | |
112 | Bolivia | 33 index | |
113 | El Salvador | 33 index | |
114 | Maldives | 33 index | |
115 | Niger | 33 index | |
116 | Ecuador | 32 index | |
117 | Egypt | 32 index | |
118 | Gabon | 32 index | |
119 | Pakistan | 32 index | |
120 | Togo | 32 index | |
121 | Azerbaijan | 31 index | |
122 | Djibouti | 31 index | |
123 | Kazakhstan | 31 index | |
124 | Liberia | 31 index | |
125 | Malawi | 31 index | |
126 | Mali | 31 index | |
127 | Republic of Moldova | 31 index | |
128 | Nepal | 31 index | |
129 | Gambia | 30 index | |
130 | Iran | 30 index | |
131 | Myanmar | 30 index | |
132 | Sierra Leone | 30 index | |
133 | Ukraine | 30 index | |
134 | Dominican Republic | 29 index | |
135 | Honduras | 29 index | |
136 | Kyrgyzstan | 29 index | |
137 | Laos | 29 index | |
138 | Mexico | 29 index | |
139 | Papua New Guinea | 29 index | |
140 | Paraguay | 29 index | |
141 | Russia | 29 index | |
142 | Bangladesh | 28 index | |
143 | Guatemala | 28 index | |
144 | Kenya | 28 index | |
145 | Lebanon | 28 index | |
146 | Mauritania | 28 index | |
147 | Comoros | 27 index | |
148 | Guinea | 27 index | |
149 | Nigeria | 27 index | |
150 | Nicaragua | 26 index | |
151 | Uganda | 26 index | |
152 | Cameroon | 25 index | |
153 | Mozambique | 25 index | |
154 | Madagascar | 24 index | |
155 | Central African Republic | 23 index | |
156 | Burundi | 22 index | |
157 | Haiti | 22 index | |
158 | Uzbekistan | 22 index | |
159 | Zimbabwe | 22 index | |
160 | Cambodia | 21 index | |
161 | Congo | 21 index | |
162 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 21 index | |
163 | Tajikistan | 21 index | |
164 | Chad | 20 index | |
165 | Eritrea | 20 index | |
166 | Angola | 19 index | |
167 | Turkmenistan | 19 index | |
168 | Iraq | 18 index | |
169 | Venezuela | 18 index | |
170 | Equatorial Guinea | 17 index | |
171 | Guinea-Bissau | 17 index | |
172 | Libya | 17 index | |
173 | North Korea | 17 index | |
174 | Sudan | 16 index | |
175 | Yemen | 16 index | |
176 | Afghanistan | 15 index | |
177 | Syrian Arab Republic | 14 index | |
178 | South Sudan | 12 index | |
179 | Somalia | 9 index |
- #1
New Zealand
- #2
Denmark
- #3
Finland
- #4
Norway
- #5
Switzerland
- #6
Singapore
- #7
Sweden
- #8
Canada
- #9
Luxembourg
- #10
Netherlands
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #179
Somalia
- #178
South Sudan
- #177
Syrian Arab Republic
- #176
Afghanistan
- #175
Yemen
- #174
Sudan
- #173
North Korea
- #172
Libya
- #171
Guinea-Bissau
- #170
Equatorial Guinea
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Corruption Perceptions Index Score for 2017 was led by New Zealand with a score of 89, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 9.00 to a maximum of 89.00. The median score across the 179 countries surveyed was 38.00, providing insight into the global perception of corruption during that year.
Global Leaders in Transparency
In 2017, countries like New Zealand and Denmark topped the Corruption Perceptions Index with scores of 89 and 88, respectively. These high scores are indicative of robust governance structures and a strong rule of law. Switzerland, Norway, and Finland each scored 85, reflecting similar systemic attributes. These nations typically have transparent public sectors and effective anti-corruption measures, contributing to higher scores. For instance, New Zealand's consistent legal enforcement and public access to information have bolstered its standing.
Struggles with Corruption
At the opposite end of the spectrum, Somalia scored a mere 9, the lowest in the 2017 index. Other countries such as South Sudan and Syrian Arab Republic also reported low scores of 12 and 14, respectively. These nations are often plagued by internal conflict, weak institutional frameworks, and limited governmental transparency, which contribute to their low rankings. In Afghanistan and Sudan, scores of 15 and 16 further highlight the challenges posed by political instability and lack of effective governance structures.
Significant Movers in 2017
The year 2017 saw notable changes in the Corruption Perceptions Index scores for several countries. Barbados experienced the most significant improvement with an increase of 7.00 points, reflecting a concerted effort to enhance transparency and governance. Meanwhile, Trinidad and Tobago and the United Arab Emirates saw increases of 6.00 and 5.00 points, respectively. These improvements can often be attributed to reforms in public administration and increased anti-corruption initiatives.
Conversely, countries like Bahrain and Liberia experienced declines of 7.00 and 6.00 points, respectively. Such decreases may result from political unrest or the rollback of previously established anti-corruption measures. In Finland and Sweden, both dropping by 4.00 points, the changes might be attributed to emerging corruption scandals or perceived inefficiencies in governance.
Analyzing the Average and Median Scores
The global average Corruption Perceptions Index score in 2017 was 43.09, suggesting that many countries still face significant challenges in combating perceived corruption. The median score of 38.00 indicates that more than half of the countries fall below the average, highlighting widespread issues with transparency and accountability worldwide. This discrepancy between high and low scorers underscores the diverse political and economic contexts in which these countries operate. Countries like Singapore and Canada, with scores of 84 and 82, respectively, exemplify how effective policy and governance can lead to higher scores, while others struggle to overcome entrenched corruption issues.
Frequently Asked Questions About Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017
Which country had the highest Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017?
New Zealand had the highest Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017, with a score of 89.
Which country had the lowest Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017?
Somalia had the lowest Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017, with a score of 9.
What was the average Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017?
The average Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017 was 43.09.
What was the median Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017?
The median Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017 was 38.
Which countries were in the top 3 for the Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017?
The top 3 countries for the Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017 were New Zealand with 89, Denmark with 88, and Switzerland with 85.
How many countries were included in the Corruption Perceptions Index Score dataset for 2017?
The dataset for the Corruption Perceptions Index Score in 2017 included 179 countries.
Insights by country
Cameroon
In 2017, Cameroon had a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 25 index, ranking #152 out of 179 countries. This score is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting a challenging environment for governance and transparency. Factors contributing to this perception include widespread corruption in public administration, lack of accountability, and limited civil society engagement.
Lithuania
In 2017, Lithuania achieved a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 59 index, ranking #39 out of 179 countries. This score is above the regional average for Eastern Europe, reflecting a relatively low perception of corruption compared to some neighboring countries. Key drivers of this performance include Lithuania's ongoing reforms to enhance transparency and governance, alongside a commitment to EU standards that promote accountability in public institutions.
Lesotho
In 2017, Lesotho achieved a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 42 index, ranking #74 out of 179 countries. This score is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in governance and public sector integrity. Key drivers of this perception include political instability and a history of corruption scandals, which have undermined trust in government institutions.
Syrian Arab Republic
In 2017, the Syrian Arab Republic had a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 14 index, ranking #177 out of 179 countries. This score places Syria among the lowest globally, significantly below the regional average for the Middle East and North Africa. Ongoing conflict, political instability, and a lack of effective governance have severely hampered anti-corruption efforts, contributing to this dismal perception of corruption.
Paraguay
In 2017, Paraguay had a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 29 index, ranking #140 out of 179 countries. This score is significantly lower than the regional average in South America, indicating persistent issues with corruption. Key drivers of this low score include a lack of transparency in government operations and widespread bribery in both public and private sectors.
Namibia
In 2017, Namibia achieved a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 51 index, ranking #53 out of 179 countries. This score is relatively strong compared to the regional average in Southern Africa, reflecting a more favorable perception of corruption than many of its neighbors. Factors contributing to this performance include Namibia's stable political environment and relatively effective governance structures, which have helped mitigate corruption in public service.
Maldives
In 2017, the Maldives achieved a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 33 index, ranking #114 out of 179 countries. This score is significantly lower than the global average, indicating persistent challenges in governance and transparency. Factors contributing to this low score include political instability and allegations of corruption within government institutions, which have undermined public trust and accountability.
Malta
In 2017, Malta achieved a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 56 index, ranking #47 out of 179 countries. This score is slightly above the global average, indicating moderate levels of perceived corruption compared to several neighboring Mediterranean nations. Key drivers of this perception include Malta's robust financial services sector and ongoing concerns regarding transparency in governance and public procurement processes.
Guinea-Bissau
In 2017, Guinea-Bissau ranked #173 with a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 17 index, placing it among the lowest globally. This score reflects significant challenges compared to regional averages, as many neighboring countries score higher in governance and anti-corruption measures. The pervasive corruption in Guinea-Bissau can be attributed to political instability, weak institutions, and a history of military coups that undermine effective governance.
Peru
In 2017, Peru had a Corruption Perceptions Index Score of 37 index, ranking #99 out of 179 countries. This score is below the regional average for Latin America, indicating significant challenges in governance and transparency. Key drivers of this perception include ongoing issues related to political instability, high-profile corruption scandals, and inadequate enforcement of anti-corruption laws.
Data Source
Corruption Perceptions Index | Our World in Data
The Corruption Perceptions Index, compiled by Transparency International and featured on Our World in Data, measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption in various countries. It provides country-level statistics that reflect the perceptions of businesspeople and experts regarding corruption, using a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Corruption Perceptions Index Score data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data