Broadband Internet Penetration 2009
Broadband internet penetration measures the percentage of the population with access to high-speed internet.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bermuda | 62.928 % | |
2 | Liechtenstein | 44.749 % | |
3 | Monaco | 41.404 % | |
4 | Netherlands | 36.735 % | |
5 | Denmark | 36.622 % | |
6 | Switzerland | 35.427 % | |
7 | Cayman Islands | 34.769 % | |
8 | Norway | 34.549 % | |
9 | South Korea | 33.676 % | |
10 | Iceland | 33.606 % | |
11 | Faroe Islands | 32.754 % | |
12 | Sweden | 31.672 % | |
13 | France | 31.458 % | |
14 | Luxembourg | 31.338 % | |
15 | Germany | 30.845 % | |
16 | Canada | 30.42 % | |
17 | Gibraltar | 30.163 % | |
18 | Finland | 29.325 % | |
19 | Belgium | 29.162 % | |
20 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 29.066 % | |
21 | United Kingdom | 28.601 % | |
22 | British Virgin Islands | 28.253 % | |
23 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 27.709 % | |
24 | Andorra | 27.347 % | |
25 | Malta | 27.01 % | |
26 | United States | 25.969 % | |
27 | Japan | 25.636 % | |
28 | Singapore | 24.826 % | |
29 | Australia | 23.968 % | |
30 | Israel | 23.91 % | |
31 | New Zealand | 23.751 % | |
32 | Estonia | 23.501 % | |
33 | China, Macao SAR | 22.956 % | |
34 | Austria | 22.511 % | |
35 | Greenland | 22.186 % | |
36 | Slovenia | 22.059 % | |
37 | Ireland | 21.536 % | |
38 | Cyprus | 21.49 % | |
39 | Latvia | 21.228 % | |
40 | Spain | 21.015 % | |
41 | Barbados | 20.905 % | |
42 | Italy | 20.173 % | |
43 | Lithuania | 20.036 % | |
44 | Hungary | 19.765 % | |
45 | Czech Republic | 19.539 % | |
46 | Antigua and Barbuda | 19.025 % | |
47 | Aruba | 18.985 % | |
48 | San Marino | 18.099 % | |
49 | Portugal | 18.077 % | |
50 | Greece | 17.254 % | |
51 | Croatia | 16.642 % | |
52 | Poland | 14.725 % | |
53 | Slovakia | 14.393 % | |
54 | Romania | 13.669 % | |
55 | Bulgaria | 13.328 % | |
56 | New Caledonia | 12.875 % | |
57 | Puerto Rico | 12.859 % | |
58 | Bahrain | 11.787 % | |
59 | Belarus | 11.489 % | |
60 | North Macedonia | 11.297 % | |
61 | French Polynesia | 11.144 % | |
62 | Grenada | 11.12 % | |
63 | Saint Lucia | 10.941 % | |
64 | Dominica | 10.601 % | |
65 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 10.413 % | |
66 | United Arab Emirates | 10.294 % | |
67 | Chile | 9.728 % | |
68 | Uruguay | 9.591 % | |
69 | Trinidad and Tobago | 9.431 % | |
70 | Montenegro | 9.381 % | |
71 | Qatar | 9.127 % | |
72 | Russia | 8.966 % | |
73 | Turkey | 8.901 % | |
74 | Bahamas | 8.707 % | |
75 | Mexico | 8.608 % | |
76 | Argentina | 8.594 % | |
77 | United States Virgin Islands | 8.43 % | |
78 | Serbia | 8.063 % | |
79 | China | 7.745 % | |
80 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 7.529 % | |
81 | Panama | 6.576 % | |
82 | Brazil | 6.107 % | |
83 | Saudi Arabia | 5.937 % | |
84 | Mauritius | 5.698 % | |
85 | Malaysia | 5.524 % | |
86 | Brunei Darussalam | 5.203 % | |
87 | Republic of Moldova | 5.064 % | |
88 | Venezuela | 4.928 % | |
89 | Seychelles | 4.864 % | |
90 | Colombia | 4.777 % | |
91 | Maldives | 4.416 % | |
92 | Ukraine | 4.148 % | |
93 | Jamaica | 4.099 % | |
94 | Costa Rica | 4.059 % | |
95 | Lebanon | 3.946 % | |
96 | Thailand | 3.852 % | |
97 | Georgia | 3.828 % | |
98 | Vietnam | 3.718 % | |
99 | Tunisia | 3.501 % | |
100 | Kazakhstan | 3.474 % | |
101 | Jordan | 3.332 % | |
102 | Dominican Republic | 3.255 % | |
103 | Albania | 3.107 % | |
104 | Peru | 2.864 % | |
105 | Belize | 2.668 % | |
106 | El Salvador | 2.47 % | |
107 | Algeria | 2.305 % | |
108 | Cabo Verde | 2.168 % | |
109 | Philippines | 1.825 % | |
110 | Guam | 1.805 % | |
111 | Suriname | 1.668 % | |
112 | Ecuador | 1.627 % | |
113 | Kuwait | 1.61 % | |
114 | Mongolia | 1.504 % | |
115 | Morocco | 1.497 % | |
116 | Oman | 1.43 % | |
117 | Fiji | 1.414 % | |
118 | Nicaragua | 1.391 % | |
119 | Paraguay | 1.365 % | |
120 | Armenia | 1.354 % | |
121 | Egypt | 1.231 % | |
122 | Azerbaijan | 1.105 % | |
123 | Guatemala | 1.097 % | |
124 | Libya | 0.99 % | |
125 | Bolivia | 0.96 % | |
126 | Tuvalu | 0.956 % | |
127 | Tonga | 0.933 % | |
128 | South Africa | 0.93 % | |
129 | Guyana | 0.907 % | |
130 | Sri Lanka | 0.817 % | |
131 | Indonesia | 0.766 % | |
132 | Palau | 0.759 % | |
133 | Kiribati | 0.719 % | |
134 | India | 0.632 % | |
135 | Djibouti | 0.58 % | |
136 | Iran | 0.523 % | |
137 | Botswana | 0.502 % | |
138 | Bhutan | 0.487 % | |
139 | Senegal | 0.476 % | |
140 | Solomon Islands | 0.386 % | |
141 | Zimbabwe | 0.359 % | |
142 | Kyrgyzstan | 0.322 % | |
143 | Uzbekistan | 0.318 % | |
144 | Sao Tome and Principe | 0.249 % | |
145 | Gabon | 0.223 % | |
146 | Vanuatu | 0.215 % | |
147 | Cambodia | 0.21 % | |
148 | Bangladesh | 0.21 % | |
149 | Yemen | 0.208 % | |
150 | Mauritania | 0.206 % | |
151 | Pakistan | 0.201 % | |
152 | Benin | 0.2 % | |
153 | Syrian Arab Republic | 0.158 % | |
154 | Eswatini | 0.136 % | |
155 | Ghana | 0.114 % | |
156 | Samoa | 0.104 % | |
157 | Zambia | 0.079 % | |
158 | Burkina Faso | 0.076 % | |
159 | Laos | 0.069 % | |
160 | Angola | 0.067 % | |
161 | Togo | 0.064 % | |
162 | Nepal | 0.063 % | |
163 | Mozambique | 0.061 % | |
164 | Papua New Guinea | 0.06 % | |
165 | Tajikistan | 0.059 % | |
166 | Mali | 0.053 % | |
167 | Nigeria | 0.051 % | |
168 | Myanmar | 0.048 % | |
169 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 0.045 % | |
170 | Kenya | 0.045 % | |
171 | Timor-Leste | 0.044 % | |
172 | Cuba | 0.026 % | |
173 | Namibia | 0.023 % | |
174 | Rwanda | 0.022 % | |
175 | Madagascar | 0.021 % | |
176 | Lesotho | 0.02 % | |
177 | Uganda | 0.019 % | |
178 | Gambia | 0.016 % | |
179 | Tanzania | 0.016 % | |
180 | Equatorial Guinea | 0.016 % | |
181 | Comoros | 0.01 % | |
182 | Turkmenistan | 0.009 % | |
183 | Malawi | 0.007 % | |
184 | Niger | 0.006 % | |
185 | Cameroon | 0.005 % | |
186 | Ethiopia | 0.004 % | |
187 | Liberia | 0.004 % | |
188 | Afghanistan | 0.004 % | |
189 | Congo | 0.003 % | |
190 | Chad | 0.002 % | |
191 | Eritrea | 0.002 % | |
192 | Burundi | 0.002 % |
- #1
Bermuda
- #2
Liechtenstein
- #3
Monaco
- #4
Netherlands
- #5
Denmark
- #6
Switzerland
- #7
Cayman Islands
- #8
Norway
- #9
South Korea
- #10
Iceland
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #192
Burundi
- #191
Eritrea
- #190
Chad
- #189
Congo
- #188
Afghanistan
- #187
Liberia
- #186
Ethiopia
- #185
Cameroon
- #184
Niger
- #183
Malawi
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2009, Bermuda led the world in Broadband Internet Penetration with an impressive rate of 62.93%, while the global range spanned from 0.00% to this maximum. The global median for Broadband Internet Penetration in 2009 was 3.85%, providing a stark contrast to the leading figures and highlighting significant disparities in internet access worldwide.
Economic Influence on Broadband Internet Penetration
Economic prosperity plays a crucial role in the high levels of broadband penetration seen in countries like Bermuda and Liechtenstein, with penetration rates of 62.93% and 44.75%, respectively. These countries benefit from robust economic infrastructures that support widespread technological adoption. Similarly, Monaco and the Netherlands, with penetration rates of 41.40% and 36.74%, leverage their strong economies to foster high-speed internet access across their populations.
In contrast, nations at the lower end of the spectrum, such as Burundi and Eritrea, with penetration rates of 0.00% and 0.002%, often face economic challenges that limit the resources available for developing internet infrastructure. Such economic disparities contribute significantly to the digital divide observed in the data.
Geographic and Demographic Factors
Geographic and demographic factors also influence broadband penetration. For example, countries with smaller populations and higher urbanization rates, like Iceland and Denmark, see higher penetration rates of 33.61% and 36.62%, respectively. These nations benefit from concentrated urban centers that facilitate infrastructure development and connectivity.
Conversely, countries like Niger and Malawi, with penetration rates of 0.006% and 0.007%, often have large rural populations that are more challenging to serve due to the high costs of extending infrastructure over vast and less densely populated areas. This geographic isolation further exacerbates the digital divide.
Policy and Infrastructure Development
Government policy and infrastructure investment are critical drivers of broadband penetration. South Korea, with a penetration rate of 33.68%, exemplifies how proactive government initiatives can enhance internet access. The South Korean government's emphasis on technology as a growth driver has led to significant investments in broadband infrastructure, resulting in one of the highest penetration rates in Asia.
In contrast, countries like Afghanistan and Liberia, with penetration rates of 0.004% and 0.004%, often lack the necessary policy frameworks and financial resources to develop comprehensive broadband networks. Political instability and limited government capacity further impede progress in these regions.
Year-Over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
The average year-over-year change in broadband penetration was 1.05%, indicating a growth rate of 46.1%. Notably, Antigua and Barbuda experienced the most significant increase, with a 216.4% rise, bringing its penetration to 13.01%. This surge can be attributed to targeted investment in telecommunications infrastructure and government-led initiatives to improve internet access.
In contrast, Tuvalu saw the largest decrease, with a drop of 1.85% or -66.0%. Such declines may result from infrastructural challenges, economic downturns, or shifts in policy focus. The example of Finland, which experienced a modest decrease of 1.13% or -3.7%, highlights how even well-connected countries can face temporary setbacks due to market saturation or shifts in consumer demand.
Overall, the data from 2009 underscores the importance of economic strength, geographic and demographic factors, and government policy in shaping broadband penetration rates across the globe. Addressing these disparities requires concerted efforts from governments, industry stakeholders, and international organizations to ensure that high-speed internet access becomes a universally available resource.
Frequently Asked Questions About Broadband Internet Penetration in 2009
Which country had the highest broadband internet penetration in 2009?
Bermuda had the highest broadband internet penetration in 2009 with 62.93%.
Which country had the lowest broadband internet penetration in 2009?
Burundi had the lowest broadband internet penetration in 2009 with 0%.
What was the average broadband internet penetration across countries in 2009?
The average broadband internet penetration across countries in 2009 was 9.65%.
What was the median broadband internet penetration in 2009?
The median broadband internet penetration in 2009 was 3.84%.
How many countries had a broadband internet penetration of 0% in 2009?
There were eight countries with a broadband internet penetration of 0% in 2009.
What was the broadband internet penetration of the second-highest country in 2009?
Liechtenstein had the second-highest broadband internet penetration in 2009 with 44.75%.
Insights by country
Uzbekistan
In 2009, Uzbekistan had a Broadband Internet Penetration of 0.3175989 %, ranking #143 out of 192 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the country's ongoing challenges in digital infrastructure development. Key factors contributing to this low penetration include limited investment in telecommunications and a regulatory environment that has historically restricted foreign competition and innovation.
Qatar
In 2009, Qatar had a Broadband Internet Penetration of 9.127077 %, ranking #71 out of 192 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in widespread connectivity. The country's rapid economic growth and investment in infrastructure have been key drivers, yet the relatively small population and geographic factors have limited broader access to high-speed internet services.
Bermuda
Bermuda achieved a remarkable Broadband Internet Penetration rate of 62.92771 % in 2009, ranking #1 out of 192 countries. This figure significantly outpaced many other nations, including regional counterparts that often lag in connectivity. The high penetration rate can be attributed to Bermuda's small population, advanced telecommunications infrastructure, and a robust regulatory environment that encourages competition among service providers.
Colombia
In 2009, Colombia ranked #90 globally in Broadband Internet Penetration with a value of 4.776843%. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in infrastructure development compared to more advanced nations. Key factors influencing this low penetration rate include Colombia's diverse geography, which complicates network expansion, and economic disparities that limit access to technology in rural areas.
Nigeria
Nigeria ranked #167 globally in 2009 for Broadband Internet Penetration, with a value of 0.050575916 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating limited access to high-speed internet compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include Nigeria's economic challenges, inadequate infrastructure, and a large rural population that lacks connectivity options.
Italy
In 2009, Italy ranked #42 globally for Broadband Internet Penetration with a value of 20.173168 %. This figure is below the European average, indicating a slower adoption rate compared to many of its neighbors. Contributing factors include Italy's diverse geography, which presents challenges for infrastructure development, and historical regulatory hurdles that have impacted investment in telecommunications. Additionally, urban-rural disparities in access have further influenced broadband availability across the country.
Dominica
In 2009, Dominica ranked #64 globally with a Broadband Internet Penetration of 10.600604 %. This figure is notably lower than the Caribbean regional average, reflecting challenges in infrastructure development. The country's rugged terrain and small population contribute to higher costs for broadband expansion, limiting access to reliable internet services, particularly in rural areas.
Malta
In 2009, Malta achieved a global rank of #25 with a Broadband Internet Penetration of 27.009827%. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Malta's advanced telecommunications infrastructure compared to many other countries. The country's small size and high population density facilitate the rapid deployment of broadband services, while government initiatives have aimed to enhance digital connectivity and support economic growth.
British Virgin Islands
The British Virgin Islands ranked 22 globally for Broadband Internet Penetration in 2009, with a value of 28.253363 %. This figure is notably higher than many Caribbean neighbors, reflecting a strong commitment to improving digital infrastructure. The islands benefit from a thriving tourism sector and a favorable regulatory environment, which have driven investments in telecommunications and internet services.
Netherlands
In 2009, the Netherlands achieved a remarkable 4th global rank in Broadband Internet Penetration with a value of 36.735466 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's advanced digital infrastructure compared to many nations. The high penetration rate can be attributed to the Netherlands' robust telecommunications policies and investments in technology, as well as its densely populated urban areas that facilitate widespread internet access.
Data Source
Landline Internet subscriptions per 100 people | Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a research organization that provides comprehensive data and visualizations on global development issues. The dataset on landline internet subscriptions per 100 people offers country-level statistics on broadband penetration, facilitating comparisons across nations.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Broadband Internet Penetration data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.