Tax Burden (% of GDP) 2010
Tax Burden measures the proportion of GDP collected by governments as taxes, influencing economic freedom.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Timor-Leste | 110.173 % | |
2 | China, Macao SAR | 34.386 % | |
3 | Denmark | 32.764 % | |
4 | Lesotho | 30.299 % | |
5 | Sweden | 27.815 % | |
6 | Trinidad and Tobago | 26.244 % | |
7 | Norway | 26.192 % | |
8 | New Zealand | 26.086 % | |
9 | Namibia | 25.542 % | |
10 | Austria | 25.496 % | |
11 | United Kingdom | 25.167 % | |
12 | Malta | 25.14 % | |
13 | Belgium | 24.464 % | |
14 | Jamaica | 24.278 % | |
15 | Botswana | 23.883 % | |
16 | Luxembourg | 23.818 % | |
17 | Italy | 23.738 % | |
18 | Cyprus | 23.054 % | |
19 | Hungary | 22.635 % | |
20 | South Africa | 22.521 % | |
21 | Slovenia | 22.018 % | |
22 | Israel | 21.992 % | |
23 | France | 21.986 % | |
24 | Ireland | 21.858 % | |
25 | Fiji | 21.823 % | |
26 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 21.667 % | |
27 | Georgia | 21.111 % | |
28 | Morocco | 21.089 % | |
29 | Netherlands | 20.774 % | |
30 | Barbados | 20.622 % | |
31 | Greece | 20.435 % | |
32 | Australia | 20.412 % | |
33 | Croatia | 20.281 % | |
34 | Estonia | 20.189 % | |
35 | Iceland | 19.977 % | |
36 | Portugal | 19.871 % | |
37 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 19.686 % | |
38 | Mongolia | 19.593 % | |
39 | Serbia | 19.431 % | |
40 | Tunisia | 19.2 % | |
41 | Belize | 18.849 % | |
42 | Turkey | 18.815 % | |
43 | Finland | 18.601 % | |
44 | Saint Lucia | 18.214 % | |
45 | Uruguay | 18.136 % | |
46 | Bulgaria | 17.871 % | |
47 | Mauritius | 17.766 % | |
48 | Marshall Islands | 17.722 % | |
49 | Czech Republic | 17.623 % | |
50 | Chile | 17.471 % | |
51 | Zimbabwe | 17.435 % | |
52 | Armenia | 17.07 % | |
53 | Palau | 16.948 % | |
54 | North Macedonia | 16.866 % | |
55 | Lebanon | 16.844 % | |
56 | Cabo Verde | 16.822 % | |
57 | Poland | 16.537 % | |
58 | Belarus | 16.321 % | |
59 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 16.312 % | |
60 | Eswatini | 16.287 % | |
61 | Lithuania | 16.241 % | |
62 | Romania | 16.239 % | |
63 | Vanuatu | 16.195 % | |
64 | El Salvador | 15.812 % | |
65 | Kazakhstan | 15.712 % | |
66 | San Marino | 15.592 % | |
67 | Peru | 15.467 % | |
68 | Republic of Moldova | 15.161 % | |
69 | Slovakia | 15.012 % | |
70 | Ukraine | 14.998 % | |
71 | Thailand | 14.933 % | |
72 | Angola | 14.559 % | |
73 | Honduras | 14.425 % | |
74 | Mozambique | 14.347 % | |
75 | Brazil | 14.25 % | |
76 | Latvia | 14.162 % | |
77 | Egypt | 14.13 % | |
78 | Jordan | 13.924 % | |
79 | Burundi | 13.856 % | |
80 | Nicaragua | 13.678 % | |
81 | Nepal | 13.396 % | |
82 | Ghana | 13.388 % | |
83 | Malaysia | 13.332 % | |
84 | Russia | 13.048 % | |
85 | Laos | 13.027 % | |
86 | Costa Rica | 12.953 % | |
87 | South Korea | 12.883 % | |
88 | Argentina | 12.853 % | |
89 | Zambia | 12.835 % | |
90 | Singapore | 12.786 % | |
91 | Spain | 12.355 % | |
92 | Dominican Republic | 12.221 % | |
93 | Bhutan | 12.194 % | |
94 | Azerbaijan | 12.158 % | |
95 | Colombia | 12.142 % | |
96 | Canada | 11.733 % | |
97 | Philippines | 11.635 % | |
98 | Burkina Faso | 11.31 % | |
99 | Germany | 11.304 % | |
100 | Sri Lanka | 10.932 % | |
101 | Mali | 10.842 % | |
102 | Bahamas | 10.762 % | |
103 | Guatemala | 10.605 % | |
104 | Malawi | 10.563 % | |
105 | Togo | 10.508 % | |
106 | India | 10.388 % | |
107 | Côte d'Ivoire | 10.214 % | |
108 | China | 10.038 % | |
109 | Tanzania | 9.912 % | |
110 | Mexico | 9.675 % | |
111 | Switzerland | 9.193 % | |
112 | Afghanistan | 9.17 % | |
113 | Paraguay | 8.871 % | |
114 | Maldives | 8.848 % | |
115 | United States | 8.563 % | |
116 | Madagascar | 8.535 % | |
117 | Central African Republic | 8.408 % | |
118 | Ethiopia | 8.163 % | |
119 | Cambodia | 8.144 % | |
120 | Bangladesh | 7.835 % | |
121 | Equatorial Guinea | 7.586 % | |
122 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 7.453 % | |
123 | Congo | 6.903 % | |
124 | Sudan | 5.862 % | |
125 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 4.74 % | |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 2.53 % | |
127 | Bahrain | 1.128 % |
- #1
Timor-Leste
- #2
China, Macao SAR
- #3
Denmark
- #4
Lesotho
- #5
Sweden
- #6
Trinidad and Tobago
- #7
Norway
- #8
New Zealand
- #9
Namibia
- #10
Austria
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #127
Bahrain
- #126
Saudi Arabia
- #125
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #124
Sudan
- #123
Congo
- #122
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #121
Equatorial Guinea
- #120
Bangladesh
- #119
Cambodia
- #118
Ethiopia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2010, Timor-Leste led the world with the highest Tax Burden (% of GDP) at an exceptional 110.17%, while the global range of tax burdens spanned from 1.13% to 110.17%. The average global tax burden for the year was 16.84%, providing a benchmark to compare individual country performances.
Economic Structures and Their Impact on Tax Burden
Different economic structures significantly influence a country's tax burden. For instance, Timor-Leste experienced an extraordinary tax burden of 110.17%, which is an anomaly largely due to accounting methods related to oil revenues rather than conventional tax collection. In contrast, Denmark and Sweden reported tax burdens of 32.76% and 27.81% respectively, reflecting their comprehensive welfare state models where high taxes fund extensive public services.
Conversely, countries like Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, with tax burdens of 1.13% and 2.53%, rely heavily on oil revenues rather than taxation, which allows them to maintain lower tax burdens. This reliance on non-tax revenues results in a different fiscal dynamic compared to welfare states in Europe.
Geopolitical Influences on Tax Burden
Geopolitical factors also shape tax policies and burdens. For example, China, Macao SAR recorded a tax burden of 34.39%, reflecting its unique administrative and economic status within China. This high tax burden can be attributed to Macao's thriving gaming industry, which generates significant tax revenue. Meanwhile, Lesotho and Namibia, with tax burdens of 30.30% and 25.54%, demonstrate the influence of regional economic policies in Southern Africa, where tax systems are often designed to support development goals.
In contrast, countries such as Micronesia and Sudan have lower tax burdens of 4.74% and 5.86%, respectively. These lower figures can be attributed to less diversified economies and reliance on foreign aid and remittances, reducing the necessity or capability of high tax collection.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals significant shifts in some countries' tax burdens. Zimbabwe experienced the largest increase, with its tax burden rising by 8.24% or 89.6%, due to economic stabilization efforts and improved tax collection mechanisms. Similarly, China, Macao SAR saw a rise of 5.08%, driven by growth in its gaming and tourism sectors.
On the other hand, Lesotho and Eswatini witnessed substantial decreases in their tax burdens, dropping by 9.69% and 9.38%, respectively. These declines can often be attributed to economic contraction or policy shifts aimed at stimulating growth through reduced taxation.
Policy Implications and Economic Freedom
The tax burden as a percentage of GDP offers insights into a country's economic freedom and fiscal policy orientation. High tax burdens, as seen in Denmark and Sweden, often correlate with robust public services and social safety nets but may also imply less economic freedom for individuals and businesses. Conversely, low tax burdens, like those in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, suggest greater economic freedom but may result in less public sector support.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers who aim to balance tax revenue needs with fostering a conducive environment for economic growth and development. By examining the tax burden, countries can tailor their fiscal policies to better align with their economic goals and societal needs.
Frequently Asked Questions About Tax Burden (% of GDP) in 2010
Which country had the highest tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
Timor-Leste had the highest tax burden in 2010, with 110% of its GDP collected as taxes.
What was the average tax burden as a percentage of GDP across all countries in 2010?
The average tax burden across all countries in 2010 was 16.84% of GDP.
Which country had the lowest tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
Bahrain had the lowest tax burden in 2010, with only 1.13% of its GDP collected as taxes.
What was the median tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
The median tax burden in 2010 was 15.81% of GDP.
What is the range of tax burdens as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
The range of tax burdens in 2010 spans from 1.13% in Bahrain to 110% in Timor-Leste.
Which countries were in the top 10 for tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 2010?
The top 10 countries for tax burden in 2010 were Timor-Leste, China (Macao SAR), Denmark, Lesotho, Sweden, Trinidad and Tobago, Norway, New Zealand, Namibia, and Austria.
Insights by country
Namibia
In 2010, Namibia had a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 25.5423159777691 %, ranking #9 out of 127 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant reliance on tax revenue to fund public services. Key drivers of this high tax burden include Namibia's commitment to social welfare programs and infrastructure development, which are essential for addressing disparities in a country with a diverse and sparsely populated landscape.
Poland
In 2010, Poland's Tax Burden (% of GDP) was 16.5370235494052 %, ranking #57 out of 127 countries. This figure is below the European Union average, indicating a relatively lower tax load compared to many of its neighbors. Key factors contributing to this tax burden include Poland's transition to a market economy, which has led to a focus on attracting foreign investment and maintaining competitive tax rates.
Timor-Leste
In 2010, Timor-Leste achieved the highest Tax Burden (% of GDP) globally, with a remarkable 110.17258804732 %. This figure significantly surpasses regional averages and reflects the country's unique economic structure, where oil revenues heavily influence public finances. The high tax burden is primarily driven by the government's reliance on petroleum exports, which constitute a substantial portion of GDP, alongside ongoing investments in infrastructure and public services.
Colombia
In 2010, Colombia ranked #95 globally with a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 12.1421652023674 %. This figure is notably lower than the average tax burden in Latin America, which typically hovers around 20%. The relatively low tax burden in Colombia can be attributed to a combination of factors, including a large informal economy and ongoing challenges in tax collection efficiency.
Central African Republic
In 2010, the Central African Republic had a tax burden of 8.4078921966114 %, ranking #117 out of 127 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating limited revenue generation capabilities compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include ongoing political instability, a largely informal economy, and inadequate infrastructure, which hinder effective tax collection and economic growth.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
In 2010, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines held a global rank of #26 with a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 21.6672659337995 %. This figure is relatively high compared to many Caribbean neighbors, reflecting the country's commitment to public services and infrastructure. The tax structure is influenced by its small economy, reliance on tourism, and efforts to maintain fiscal stability amidst external economic pressures.
Israel
In 2010, Israel had a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 21.9917663960841 %, ranking #22 out of 127 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's robust public sector and social welfare programs. Key drivers of this tax burden include Israel's significant investment in defense and technology sectors, along with a high cost of living that influences tax policy.
Maldives
In 2010, the Maldives ranked #114 globally with a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 8.84762793030511 %. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a relatively light tax regime compared to many countries. The low tax burden can be attributed to the Maldives' reliance on tourism, which generates substantial revenue without heavy taxation, coupled with its small population that limits the tax base.
China, Macao SAR
In 2010, China, Macao SAR had a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 34.3855448949676 %, ranking #2 out of 127 countries. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a robust fiscal policy in place. The high tax burden can be attributed to Macao's unique economic model, which relies heavily on tourism and gaming revenues, allowing for substantial public investment and social services.
United States
The United States had a tax burden (% of GDP) of 8.56322203026373 % in 2010, ranking #115 out of 127 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating a relatively light tax load compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include a strong emphasis on individual income tax and corporate tax policies that prioritize growth, as well as a diverse economy that generates substantial revenue without high tax rates.
Data Source
Tax revenue (% of GDP), World Bank (WB)
Taxes are compulsory, unrequited payments, in cash or in kind, made by institutional units to government units. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Tax Burden (% of GDP) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data