Tax Burden (% of GDP) 2009
Tax Burden measures the proportion of GDP collected by governments as taxes, influencing economic freedom.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Lesotho | 39.986 % | |
2 | Denmark | 32.977 % | |
3 | New Zealand | 29.615 % | |
4 | China, Macao SAR | 29.304 % | |
5 | Namibia | 29.072 % | |
6 | Sweden | 27.734 % | |
7 | Botswana | 27.687 % | |
8 | Trinidad and Tobago | 26.827 % | |
9 | Malta | 25.897 % | |
10 | Eswatini | 25.669 % | |
11 | Austria | 25.397 % | |
12 | Norway | 25.345 % | |
13 | Jamaica | 24.956 % | |
14 | Barbados | 24.707 % | |
15 | United Kingdom | 24.008 % | |
16 | Italy | 23.859 % | |
17 | Luxembourg | 23.839 % | |
18 | Belgium | 23.698 % | |
19 | Georgia | 23.509 % | |
20 | Hungary | 23.341 % | |
21 | Cyprus | 23.249 % | |
22 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 22.431 % | |
23 | Ireland | 22.062 % | |
24 | Australia | 21.95 % | |
25 | South Africa | 21.895 % | |
26 | Fiji | 21.749 % | |
27 | Estonia | 21.718 % | |
28 | Morocco | 21.541 % | |
29 | Slovenia | 21.525 % | |
30 | Israel | 21.275 % | |
31 | Netherlands | 20.845 % | |
32 | France | 20.747 % | |
33 | Croatia | 20.277 % | |
34 | Tunisia | 20.048 % | |
35 | Greece | 20.047 % | |
36 | Iceland | 19.846 % | |
37 | Serbia | 19.241 % | |
38 | Saint Lucia | 19.134 % | |
39 | Portugal | 19.093 % | |
40 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 18.946 % | |
41 | Finland | 18.884 % | |
42 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 18.869 % | |
43 | Belarus | 18.629 % | |
44 | Bulgaria | 18.586 % | |
45 | Marshall Islands | 18.402 % | |
46 | Uruguay | 18.123 % | |
47 | Turkey | 18.049 % | |
48 | Czech Republic | 17.866 % | |
49 | Mauritius | 17.808 % | |
50 | Belize | 17.806 % | |
51 | Republic of Moldova | 17.685 % | |
52 | North Macedonia | 17.13 % | |
53 | Lithuania | 16.992 % | |
54 | San Marino | 16.939 % | |
55 | Cabo Verde | 16.884 % | |
56 | Lebanon | 16.856 % | |
57 | Mongolia | 16.54 % | |
58 | Armenia | 16.506 % | |
59 | Vanuatu | 16.496 % | |
60 | Poland | 16.01 % | |
61 | Palau | 15.919 % | |
62 | Angola | 15.8 % | |
63 | Ukraine | 15.789 % | |
64 | Egypt | 15.661 % | |
65 | Slovakia | 15.533 % | |
66 | Romania | 15.272 % | |
67 | El Salvador | 14.977 % | |
68 | Malaysia | 14.941 % | |
69 | Jordan | 14.77 % | |
70 | Chile | 14.606 % | |
71 | Peru | 14.457 % | |
72 | Thailand | 14.194 % | |
73 | Honduras | 14.162 % | |
74 | Azerbaijan | 14.107 % | |
75 | Latvia | 13.553 % | |
76 | Costa Rica | 13.183 % | |
77 | Nicaragua | 13.138 % | |
78 | South Korea | 13.108 % | |
79 | Russia | 12.956 % | |
80 | Singapore | 12.955 % | |
81 | Sri Lanka | 12.8 % | |
82 | Equatorial Guinea | 12.763 % | |
83 | Laos | 12.757 % | |
84 | Colombia | 12.675 % | |
85 | Dominican Republic | 12.646 % | |
86 | Ghana | 12.612 % | |
87 | Argentina | 12.383 % | |
88 | Canada | 12.304 % | |
89 | Nepal | 11.844 % | |
90 | Germany | 11.835 % | |
91 | Philippines | 11.699 % | |
92 | Zambia | 11.688 % | |
93 | Tanzania | 11.534 % | |
94 | Bahamas | 11.252 % | |
95 | Burkina Faso | 11.128 % | |
96 | Indonesia | 11.058 % | |
97 | Mali | 10.921 % | |
98 | Guatemala | 10.505 % | |
99 | Côte d'Ivoire | 10.501 % | |
100 | Togo | 10.316 % | |
101 | Spain | 10.189 % | |
102 | China | 10.135 % | |
103 | Malawi | 9.94 % | |
104 | India | 9.81 % | |
105 | Mexico | 9.235 % | |
106 | Zimbabwe | 9.197 % | |
107 | Switzerland | 9.192 % | |
108 | Maldives | 9.101 % | |
109 | Bhutan | 8.774 % | |
110 | Afghanistan | 8.482 % | |
111 | Madagascar | 8.344 % | |
112 | Paraguay | 8.328 % | |
113 | Congo | 8.224 % | |
114 | Cambodia | 8.027 % | |
115 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 7.91 % | |
116 | Central African Republic | 7.909 % | |
117 | United States | 7.904 % | |
118 | Bangladesh | 7.498 % | |
119 | Iran | 7.358 % | |
120 | Ethiopia | 6.581 % | |
121 | Sudan | 6.469 % | |
122 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 4.448 % | |
123 | Bahrain | 1.363 % |
- #1
Lesotho
- #2
Denmark
- #3
New Zealand
- #4
China, Macao SAR
- #5
Namibia
- #6
Sweden
- #7
Botswana
- #8
Trinidad and Tobago
- #9
Malta
- #10
Eswatini
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #123
Bahrain
- #122
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
- #121
Sudan
- #120
Ethiopia
- #119
Iran
- #118
Bangladesh
- #117
United States
- #116
Central African Republic
- #115
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- #114
Cambodia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2009, Lesotho had the highest Tax Burden (% of GDP) at 39.99%, while the global range spanned from 1.36% to 39.99%. The global average Tax Burden stood at 16.38%, providing a benchmark for comparative analysis of economic policies and fiscal environments across countries.
High Tax Burden: Economic and Policy Drivers
The countries with the highest Tax Burden in 2009, such as Lesotho (39.99%), Denmark (32.98%), and New Zealand (29.61%), often reflect strong government involvement in economic affairs. In these nations, high tax revenues are typically employed to fund extensive public services, including healthcare, education, and social security systems. For instance, Denmark is renowned for its comprehensive welfare state, which necessitates high taxation to sustain its generous social programs.
In contrast, smaller economies like Lesotho and Botswana (27.69%) may exhibit higher tax burdens due to limited alternative revenue sources and a reliance on taxation to fund essential infrastructure and services. Such economic structures highlight the critical role of taxation in enabling governmental functions and sustaining economic stability.
Low Tax Burden: Economic Structures and Challenges
At the opposite end of the spectrum, countries with the lowest Tax Burden, including Bahrain (1.36%) and Micronesia (Fed. States of) (4.45%), often have unique economic structures. Bahrain's economy, for example, benefits significantly from oil revenues, allowing for minimal taxation. Similarly, many Pacific Island nations like Micronesia depend heavily on external aid and remittances, reducing the necessity for high domestic tax rates.
Moreover, countries such as Sudan (6.47%) and Ethiopia (6.58%) demonstrate how lower tax burdens can reflect economic challenges, such as limited administrative capacity to effectively collect taxes and a reliance on informal economies. These factors can hinder the ability of these governments to generate revenue for public spending and development projects.
Year-over-Year Trends: Significant Shifts
In 2009, notable changes in Tax Burden were observed, with an average decrease of 0.99% or 4.3% in many countries. Equatorial Guinea experienced the most significant increase of 4.98% (63.9%), potentially driven by a restructuring of its fiscal policies to better capitalize on oil revenues. Afghanistan and Congo also saw increases of 2.39% (39.3%) and 2.33% (39.5%) respectively, possibly reflecting efforts to improve tax collection mechanisms amid post-conflict economic recovery.
Conversely, Angola faced the largest decrease in tax burden, dropping 7.19% (31.3%), likely due to fluctuations in global oil prices impacting revenue. Similarly, Belarus and Mongolia recorded significant decreases of 6.72% (26.5%) and 5.11% (23.6%) respectively, underscoring the volatility in economies heavily reliant on specific commodities or sectors.
Global Implications and Economic Freedom
The Tax Burden (% of GDP) is a critical indicator of economic freedom and governmental influence in the economy. Higher tax burdens, as seen in Denmark and Sweden (27.73%), often correlate with comprehensive public welfare systems but may also indicate less economic freedom for private enterprises. In contrast, lower burdens, such as those in Bahrain and the United States (7.90%), suggest greater economic freedom but can also reflect challenges in funding public services without alternative revenue streams.
Understanding these dynamics is essential for policymakers aiming to balance economic growth, social welfare, and fiscal sustainability. As countries navigate these challenges, the Tax Burden (% of GDP) serves as a vital metric for assessing the effectiveness and impact of national economic policies.
Frequently Asked Questions About Tax Burden (% of GDP) in 2009
Which country had the highest tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
Lesotho had the highest tax burden in 2009, with 39.99% of its GDP collected as taxes.
Which country had the lowest tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
Bahrain had the lowest tax burden in 2009, with only 1.36% of its GDP collected as taxes.
What was the average tax burden as a percentage of GDP across all countries in 2009?
The average tax burden across all countries in 2009 was 16.38% of GDP.
What was the median tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
The median tax burden in 2009 was 15.8% of GDP.
Which countries were in the top 3 for the highest tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
The top 3 countries with the highest tax burden in 2009 were Lesotho (39.99%), Denmark (32.98%), and New Zealand (29.61%).
What was the range of tax burdens as a percentage of GDP in 2009?
The range of tax burdens in 2009 was from 1.36% in Bahrain to 39.99% in Lesotho.
Insights by country
Slovenia
In 2009, Slovenia ranked #29 globally with a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 21.525274565425 %. This figure is notably higher than the EU average, reflecting Slovenia's commitment to social welfare and public services. The relatively high tax burden can be attributed to its extensive social safety nets, which are designed to support a diverse demographic, including a growing elderly population.
Poland
In 2009, Poland had a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 16.0096652913108 %, ranking #60 out of 123 countries. This figure is notably lower than the European Union average, which typically hovers around 40%. The relatively low tax burden in Poland can be attributed to its post-communist economic reforms, which aimed to stimulate growth and attract foreign investment through a more favorable tax environment.
Marshall Islands
In 2009, the Marshall Islands had a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 18.4019656084656 %, ranking #45 out of 123 countries. This figure is relatively moderate compared to many Pacific island nations, reflecting a unique economic structure. The tax system in the Marshall Islands is influenced by its compact with the United States, which provides substantial financial assistance, allowing for lower domestic tax rates.
Côte d'Ivoire
Côte d'Ivoire ranked #99 globally in 2009 with a tax burden of 10.5012658369382 % of GDP. This figure is lower than the average tax burden in West Africa, indicating a relatively modest fiscal capacity compared to its regional peers. The country's tax system has historically faced challenges such as a large informal economy and political instability, which hinder revenue collection and limit public investment.
Luxembourg
In 2009, Luxembourg had a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 23.8391085158098 %, ranking #17 out of 123 countries. This figure is notably higher than the European Union average, reflecting Luxembourg's unique economic structure. The country's strong financial sector and favorable tax policies attract a significant number of multinational corporations, contributing to its substantial tax revenue relative to GDP.
Vanuatu
In 2009, Vanuatu had a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 16.4961980492278 %, ranking #59 out of 123 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting the country's relatively small economy and reliance on tourism and agriculture. The tax system in Vanuatu is influenced by its geographic isolation and the need to maintain a competitive environment for foreign investments, which often results in lower tax rates compared to more industrialized nations.
Sweden
In 2009, Sweden had a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 27.7335908439338 %, ranking #6 out of 123 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Sweden's commitment to a comprehensive welfare state. The high tax burden is primarily driven by extensive social programs, robust public services, and a progressive taxation system designed to promote income equality and fund healthcare and education.
Malaysia
In 2009, Malaysia ranked #68 globally with a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 14.9405015326636 %. This figure is relatively low compared to neighboring countries, reflecting a more business-friendly tax environment aimed at attracting foreign investment. Key factors contributing to this tax burden include Malaysia's emphasis on manufacturing and export-led growth, as well as its strategic initiatives to enhance economic diversification.
Egypt
In 2009, Egypt had a Tax Burden (% of GDP) of 15.6613605833813 %, ranking #64 out of 123 countries. This figure is below the average tax burden seen in many North African nations, reflecting a lower revenue collection capacity compared to regional peers. Contributing factors include a large informal economy and challenges in tax administration, which limit the government's ability to increase tax compliance and broaden the tax base.
Nicaragua
Nicaragua had a **global rank** of #77 with a **Tax Burden (% of GDP)** of 13.1376609454229 % in 2009. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting the country's ongoing economic challenges. Key drivers of this tax burden include a reliance on agriculture, limited industrialization, and a significant informal economy that affects tax collection efficiency.
Data Source
Tax revenue (% of GDP), World Bank (WB)
Taxes are compulsory, unrequited payments, in cash or in kind, made by institutional units to government units. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Tax Burden (% of GDP) data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data