Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax 2001
Income share of the richest 1% before tax reveals wealth concentration across nations. High interest due to inequality debates.
Newer data is available: Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax by country 2022 →
Where does your country rank? Pick it to see its position.
Related Economy statistics
More ↓Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Peru | 28.64 % | |
2 | Russia | 24.53 % | |
3 | Cabo Verde | 23.2 % | |
4 | Thailand | 23.19 % | |
5 | Ecuador | 22.86 % | |
6 | Uruguay | 22.11 % | |
7 | Georgia | 20.49 % | |
8 | Israel | 19.38 % | |
9 | El Salvador | 19.23 % | |
10 | Cameroon | 19.15 % | |
11 | Senegal | 19.09 % | |
12 | Iran | 18.28 % | |
13 | Timor-Leste | 17.59 % | |
14 | Taiwan | 17.38 % | |
15 | Pakistan | 17.17 % | |
16 | United States | 16.59 % | |
17 | Luxembourg | 16.38 % | |
18 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 16.22 % | |
19 | Madagascar | 15.85 % | |
20 | Kazakhstan | 15.22 % | |
21 | Singapore | 15.15 % | |
22 | Indonesia | 14.67 % | |
23 | Estonia | 14.6 % | |
24 | Argentina | 14.58 % | |
25 | Mali | 13.8 % | |
26 | Serbia | 13.47 % | |
27 | Finland | 12.89 % | |
28 | Canada | 12.71 % | |
29 | New Zealand | 12.37 % | |
30 | Greece | 12.31 % | |
31 | Ireland | 11.86 % | |
32 | United Kingdom | 11.64 % | |
33 | France | 11.5 % | |
34 | Czech Republic | 11.37 % | |
35 | Bulgaria | 11.2 % | |
36 | Portugal | 11.18 % | |
37 | Romania | 11.18 % | |
38 | China | 11 % | |
39 | Switzerland | 10.6 % | |
40 | Spain | 10.58 % | |
41 | Iceland | 10.35 % | |
42 | Denmark | 10.31 % | |
43 | Germany | 10.28 % | |
44 | Hungary | 10.11 % | |
45 | Poland | 10 % | |
46 | Montenegro | 9.66 % | |
47 | North Macedonia | 9.07 % | |
48 | Sweden | 8.97 % | |
49 | Australia | 8.94 % | |
50 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 8.87 % | |
51 | Republic of Moldova | 8.87 % | |
52 | Slovakia | 8.76 % | |
53 | Lithuania | 8.31 % | |
54 | Belgium | 7.96 % | |
55 | Croatia | 7.51 % | |
56 | Netherlands | 6.95 % | |
57 | Slovenia | 6.88 % |
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #57
Slovenia
- #56
Netherlands
- #55
Croatia
- #54
Belgium
- #53
Lithuania
- #52
Slovakia
- #51
Republic of Moldova
- #50
Bosnia and Herzegovina
- #49
Australia
- #48
Sweden
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Insights by country
Romania
In 2001, Romania ranked #37 globally with an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax at 11.18 %. This figure is indicative of a growing economic divide, especially when compared to neighboring countries in Eastern Europe, where wealth concentration varies significantly. The transition from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented system has led to disparities in income distribution, exacerbated by factors such as privatization, foreign investment, and limited social safety nets.
Canada
In 2001, Canada ranked #28 globally with an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax of 12.71%. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting significant income concentration among the wealthiest Canadians. Contributing factors include a strong resource-based economy and policies that have historically favored capital accumulation among high earners.
North Macedonia
North Macedonia had an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax of 9.07 % in 2001, ranking #47 out of 57 countries. This figure is notably higher than some of its regional neighbors, indicating a significant concentration of wealth among the elite. Contributing factors include the country's transitional economy post-independence and the limited redistribution policies that have historically favored wealth accumulation among a small segment of the population.
Australia
In 2001, Australia ranked #49 globally with an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax of 8.94 %. This figure is notably higher than the bottom-ranked country, indicating significant income inequality within its wealth distribution. Contributing factors include Australia’s robust service sector and high levels of foreign investment, which have disproportionately benefited the wealthiest individuals in the economy.
Thailand
In 2001, Thailand ranked #4 globally with an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax of 23.19 %. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a pronounced concentration of wealth within the country. Contributing factors include Thailand's rapid economic growth during the late 1990s and early 2000s, alongside a relatively low level of social welfare programs, which has allowed wealth to accumulate among the elite.
Argentina
In 2001, Argentina ranked #24 globally with an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax of 14.58 %. This figure is notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting significant income inequality within the country. Contributing factors include economic instability and policy decisions during the late 1990s and early 2000s, which disproportionately benefited the wealthy elite while leaving a large portion of the population in poverty.
France
In 2001, France ranked #33 globally with an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax of 11.5 %. This figure is notably higher than the bottom-ranked country, which reflects significant income inequality within the nation. Economic policies, including high taxation on wealth and a robust social safety net, have been pivotal in shaping the distribution of income among the wealthiest, influencing France's position in the global context.
China
In 2001, China ranked #38 globally with an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax of 11 %. This figure is relatively low compared to countries with higher income inequality, such as the United States, where the share is significantly higher. Rapid economic growth and urbanization in China during this period contributed to wealth accumulation among the elite, while many rural populations remained impoverished, exacerbating income disparities.
Sweden
In 2001, Sweden had an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax of 8.97 %, ranking #48 out of 57 countries. This figure is notably higher than some neighboring Nordic countries, reflecting a more pronounced income inequality within Sweden compared to its peers. Contributing factors include Sweden's strong welfare state, which while promoting equality, can also lead to significant wealth accumulation among the highest earners, particularly in urban areas.
Finland
In 2001, Finland ranked #27 globally with an Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax of 12.89 %. This figure is relatively low compared to countries with higher income inequality, indicating a more equitable income distribution. Finland's strong welfare state and progressive taxation policies have historically contributed to reducing income disparities, promoting social equity and economic stability.
Analysis & Context
In 2001, Peru led the world with the highest Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax at 28.64%, while globally this metric ranged from a minimum of 6.88% to a maximum of 28.64%. The average income share across the 57 countries with available data was 13.91%, providing a benchmark for understanding wealth concentration during this period.
Economic Structures and Wealth Concentration
The significant variation in the Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax across countries in 2001 can largely be attributed to differing economic structures and levels of inequality. In countries like Peru (28.64%) and Russia (24.53%), high levels of income concentration were likely influenced by economic policies that favored capital accumulation and market liberalization. These nations experienced rapid economic transformations, often without corresponding redistributive policies, which can exacerbate income disparities.
Conversely, countries such as Slovenia (6.88%) and the Netherlands (6.95%) reported much lower income shares for the richest 1%. These nations typically have robust social welfare systems and progressive taxation policies that help mitigate income inequality. The contrast between these groups of countries highlights the role of policy frameworks in shaping economic outcomes.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also play crucial roles in the income distribution patterns observed. For example, Thailand (23.19%) and Ecuador (22.86%) both have significant rural populations that may not benefit equally from economic growth centered in urban areas, leading to higher income shares for the wealthiest.
In Israel (19.38%) and Uruguay (22.11%), demographic factors such as population density and urbanization levels contribute to income concentration. Urban areas often provide greater economic opportunities, which can lead to increased income for those already positioned to take advantage of these opportunities, thereby increasing the income share of the richest.
Policy Implications on Income Distribution
The data from 2001 underscores the significant impact that governmental policies have on income distribution. Countries like Sweden (8.97%) and Australia (8.94%) maintain lower income shares for the richest 1% through policies that promote economic equality, such as high levels of social spending and progressive tax systems.
In contrast, countries with higher income shares, such as Cabo Verde (23.2%) and Georgia (20.49%), may lack comprehensive social safety nets or have more regressive tax systems, which can contribute to greater income concentration at the top. Understanding these policy impacts is crucial for addressing global inequality.
Implications for Global Inequality Debates
The data from 2001 provides critical insights into the global inequality debates that have intensified in recent years. The stark differences in income shares among the richest 1% highlight the diverse economic landscapes and policy environments that countries navigate. This period reveals the challenges of balancing economic growth with equitable wealth distribution, a challenge that remains relevant today.
As countries continue to grapple with inequality, the lessons from 2001 emphasize the importance of considering both domestic policies and international economic trends. By analyzing these patterns, policymakers can better understand the dynamics of wealth concentration and develop strategies to foster more inclusive economic systems.
Frequently Asked Questions About Income Share of Richest 1% Before Tax in 2001
Which country had the highest income share of the richest 1% before tax in 2001?
Peru had the highest income share of the richest 1% before tax in 2001, with a value of 28.64%.
What was the lowest income share of the richest 1% before tax in 2001, and which country had it?
The lowest income share of the richest 1% before tax in 2001 was 6.88%, recorded by Slovenia.
What was the average income share of the richest 1% before tax across all countries in 2001?
The average income share of the richest 1% before tax across all countries in 2001 was 13.91%.
What was the median income share of the richest 1% before tax in 2001?
The median income share of the richest 1% before tax in 2001 was 12.37%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for the income share of the richest 1% before tax in 2001?
The top 3 countries for the income share of the richest 1% before tax in 2001 were Peru (28.64%), Russia (24.53%), and Cabo Verde (23.2%).
What is the range of income shares of the richest 1% before tax in 2001?
The range of income shares of the richest 1% before tax in 2001 spans from 6.88% in Slovenia to 28.64% in Peru.
Data Source
Income share of the richest 1% (before tax) | World Inequality Database (WID.world) via Our World in Data
Data produced by World Inequality Database (WID.world), compiled and published by Our World in Data as "Income share of the richest 1% (before tax)".
Visit Data Source›Embed this ranking on your site
Free to embed with attribution. Shows the top 10 countries and links back to the full ranking.