Corruption Perceptions Index 2013
Corruption Perceptions Index scores countries based on perceived levels of public sector corruption according to experts and businesspeople.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Denmark | 91 score | |
2 | New Zealand | 91 score | |
3 | Finland | 89 score | |
4 | Sweden | 89 score | |
5 | Norway | 86 score | |
6 | Singapore | 86 score | |
7 | Switzerland | 85 score | |
8 | Netherlands | 83 score | |
9 | Australia | 81 score | |
10 | Canada | 81 score | |
11 | Luxembourg | 80 score | |
12 | Germany | 78 score | |
13 | Iceland | 78 score | |
14 | United Kingdom | 76 score | |
15 | Barbados | 75 score | |
16 | Belgium | 75 score | |
17 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 75 score | |
18 | Japan | 74 score | |
19 | United States | 73 score | |
20 | Uruguay | 73 score | |
21 | Ireland | 72 score | |
22 | Bahamas | 71 score | |
23 | Chile | 71 score | |
24 | France | 71 score | |
25 | Saint Lucia | 71 score | |
26 | Austria | 69 score | |
27 | United Arab Emirates | 69 score | |
28 | Estonia | 68 score | |
29 | Qatar | 68 score | |
30 | Botswana | 64 score | |
31 | Bhutan | 63 score | |
32 | Cyprus | 63 score | |
33 | Portugal | 62 score | |
34 | Puerto Rico | 62 score | |
35 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 62 score | |
36 | Israel | 61 score | |
37 | Taiwan | 61 score | |
38 | Brunei Darussalam | 60 score | |
39 | Poland | 60 score | |
40 | Spain | 59 score | |
41 | Cabo Verde | 58 score | |
42 | Dominica | 58 score | |
43 | Lithuania | 57 score | |
44 | Slovenia | 57 score | |
45 | Malta | 56 score | |
46 | South Korea | 55 score | |
47 | Hungary | 54 score | |
48 | Seychelles | 54 score | |
49 | Costa Rica | 53 score | |
50 | Latvia | 53 score | |
51 | Rwanda | 53 score | |
52 | Mauritius | 52 score | |
53 | Malaysia | 50 score | |
54 | Turkey | 50 score | |
55 | Georgia | 49 score | |
56 | Lesotho | 49 score | |
57 | Bahrain | 48 score | |
58 | Croatia | 48 score | |
59 | Czech Republic | 48 score | |
60 | Namibia | 48 score | |
61 | Oman | 47 score | |
62 | Slovakia | 47 score | |
63 | Cuba | 46 score | |
64 | Ghana | 46 score | |
65 | Saudi Arabia | 46 score | |
66 | Jordan | 45 score | |
67 | Montenegro | 44 score | |
68 | North Macedonia | 44 score | |
69 | Italy | 43 score | |
70 | Kuwait | 43 score | |
71 | Romania | 43 score | |
72 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 42 score | |
73 | Brazil | 42 score | |
74 | Sao Tome and Principe | 42 score | |
75 | Serbia | 42 score | |
76 | South Africa | 42 score | |
77 | Bulgaria | 41 score | |
78 | Senegal | 41 score | |
79 | Tunisia | 41 score | |
80 | China | 40 score | |
81 | Greece | 40 score | |
82 | Eswatini | 39 score | |
83 | Burkina Faso | 38 score | |
84 | El Salvador | 38 score | |
85 | Jamaica | 38 score | |
86 | Liberia | 38 score | |
87 | Mongolia | 38 score | |
88 | Peru | 38 score | |
89 | Trinidad and Tobago | 38 score | |
90 | Zambia | 38 score | |
91 | Malawi | 37 score | |
92 | Morocco | 37 score | |
93 | Sri Lanka | 37 score | |
94 | Algeria | 36 score | |
95 | Armenia | 36 score | |
96 | Benin | 36 score | |
97 | Colombia | 36 score | |
98 | Djibouti | 36 score | |
99 | India | 36 score | |
100 | Philippines | 36 score | |
101 | Suriname | 36 score | |
102 | Ecuador | 35 score | |
103 | Republic of Moldova | 35 score | |
104 | Panama | 35 score | |
105 | Thailand | 35 score | |
106 | Argentina | 34 score | |
107 | Bolivia | 34 score | |
108 | Gabon | 34 score | |
109 | Mexico | 34 score | |
110 | Niger | 34 score | |
111 | Ethiopia | 33 score | |
112 | Tanzania | 33 score | |
113 | Egypt | 32 score | |
114 | Indonesia | 32 score | |
115 | Albania | 31 score | |
116 | Nepal | 31 score | |
117 | Vietnam | 31 score | |
118 | Timor-Leste | 30 score | |
119 | Mauritania | 30 score | |
120 | Mozambique | 30 score | |
121 | Sierra Leone | 30 score | |
122 | Belarus | 29 score | |
123 | Dominican Republic | 29 score | |
124 | Guatemala | 29 score | |
125 | Togo | 29 score | |
126 | Azerbaijan | 28 score | |
127 | Comoros | 28 score | |
128 | Gambia | 28 score | |
129 | Lebanon | 28 score | |
130 | Madagascar | 28 score | |
131 | Mali | 28 score | |
132 | Nicaragua | 28 score | |
133 | Pakistan | 28 score | |
134 | Russia | 28 score | |
135 | Bangladesh | 27 score | |
136 | Côte d'Ivoire | 27 score | |
137 | Guyana | 27 score | |
138 | Kenya | 27 score | |
139 | Honduras | 26 score | |
140 | Kazakhstan | 26 score | |
141 | Laos | 26 score | |
142 | Uganda | 26 score | |
143 | Cameroon | 25 score | |
144 | Central African Republic | 25 score | |
145 | Iran | 25 score | |
146 | Nigeria | 25 score | |
147 | Papua New Guinea | 25 score | |
148 | Ukraine | 25 score | |
149 | Guinea | 24 score | |
150 | Kyrgyzstan | 24 score | |
151 | Paraguay | 24 score | |
152 | Angola | 23 score | |
153 | Congo | 22 score | |
154 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 22 score | |
155 | Tajikistan | 22 score | |
156 | Burundi | 21 score | |
157 | Myanmar | 21 score | |
158 | Zimbabwe | 21 score | |
159 | Cambodia | 20 score | |
160 | Eritrea | 20 score | |
161 | Venezuela | 20 score | |
162 | Chad | 19 score | |
163 | Equatorial Guinea | 19 score | |
164 | Guinea-Bissau | 19 score | |
165 | Haiti | 19 score | |
166 | Yemen | 18 score | |
167 | Syrian Arab Republic | 17 score | |
168 | Turkmenistan | 17 score | |
169 | Uzbekistan | 17 score | |
170 | Iraq | 16 score | |
171 | Libya | 15 score | |
172 | South Sudan | 14 score | |
173 | Sudan | 11 score | |
174 | Afghanistan | 8 score | |
175 | North Korea | 8 score | |
176 | Somalia | 8 score |
- #1
Denmark
- #2
New Zealand
- #3
Finland
- #4
Sweden
- #5
Norway
- #6
Singapore
- #7
Switzerland
- #8
Netherlands
- #9
Australia
- #10
Canada
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #176
Somalia
- #175
North Korea
- #174
Afghanistan
- #173
Sudan
- #172
South Sudan
- #171
Libya
- #170
Iraq
- #169
Uzbekistan
- #168
Turkmenistan
- #167
Syrian Arab Republic
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In the 2013 Corruption Perceptions Index, New Zealand and Denmark tied for the highest score with 91, while the global range spanned from a low of 8 in Somalia, North Korea, and Afghanistan to a high of 91. The global average score was 42.71, indicating a moderate level of perceived corruption worldwide.
Leading Nations and Their Characteristics
The top performers in the 2013 Corruption Perceptions Index, such as New Zealand, Denmark, and Finland, shared several common attributes that contribute to their high scores. These countries are characterized by strong rule of law, transparent governmental processes, and high levels of civil liberties. New Zealand and Denmark, both scoring 91, exemplify the effectiveness of robust anti-corruption frameworks and a culture of accountability.
In Europe, Sweden and Norway also scored high with 89 and 86 respectively, reflecting their sustained efforts to maintain low levels of public sector corruption through comprehensive legal systems and active civil societies. Singapore, with a score of 86, continues to be a standout in Asia, demonstrating how stringent regulations and efficient governance can combat corruption effectively.
Challenges in the Most Corrupt Countries
At the other end of the spectrum, Somalia, North Korea, and Afghanistan all scored a dismal 8. These countries face unique challenges that exacerbate corruption, including political instability, lack of institutional frameworks, and limited access to justice. In Somalia, ongoing conflict and weak governance structures have perpetuated a cycle of corruption.
Similarly, Sudan and South Sudan, with scores of 11 and 14 respectively, struggle with internal conflict and governance issues that hinder anti-corruption efforts. These environments create opportunities for public sector corruption to flourish, undermining development and stability.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes
In 2013, some countries experienced notable shifts in their Corruption Perceptions Index scores. Myanmar saw the most significant improvement, increasing its score by 6 points to 21, representing a 40% improvement. This change reflects ongoing reforms and efforts to open up the economy and improve governance.
Conversely, the Syrian Arab Republic recorded the largest decline, dropping by 9 points to 17, a 34.6% decrease. The intensifying civil conflict significantly impacted governance and transparency, exacerbating public sector corruption. Spain also saw a decrease of 6 points, reflecting public discontent and scandals involving political figures that eroded trust in public institutions.
Global Patterns and Implications
The 2013 Corruption Perceptions Index reveals a stark divide between countries with strong governance structures and those grappling with instability and weak institutions. The average score of 42.71 suggests that many countries, even outside the extremes, face significant challenges in curbing corruption.
- High-scoring nations often enjoy economic prosperity, which is partly attributed to low corruption levels that foster business confidence and foreign investment.
- Conversely, countries with low scores often experience hindered development and economic instability, as corruption deters investment and misallocates resources.
- Efforts to combat corruption are most successful when part of broader institutional reforms that enhance transparency, accountability, and citizen participation.
Overall, the 2013 data underscores the critical role of effective governance and institutional integrity in promoting transparency and reducing corruption worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013
Which country had the highest score in the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013?
New Zealand had the highest score in the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013, with a score of 91.
What was the lowest score in the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013?
The lowest score in the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013 was 8, shared by Somalia, North Korea, and Afghanistan.
What was the average score for countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013?
The average score for countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013 was 42.71.
What was the median score for countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013?
The median score for countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013 was 38.
Which countries were in the top 10 of the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013?
The top 10 countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index in 2013 included New Zealand, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Singapore, Switzerland, Netherlands, Australia, and Canada.
How many countries were included in the Corruption Perceptions Index dataset for 2013?
There were 176 countries included in the Corruption Perceptions Index dataset for 2013.
Insights by country
Angola
In 2013, Angola had a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 23, ranking #152 out of 176 countries. This score is significantly lower than the regional average for Sub-Saharan Africa, indicating widespread corruption challenges. Key drivers of this low score include a lack of transparency in government operations, pervasive bribery in public services, and a history of political instability that undermines effective governance.
Bolivia
In 2013, Bolivia had a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 34, ranking #107 out of 176 countries. This score was below the regional average for South America, indicating significant challenges in governance and transparency. Factors contributing to this perception include widespread corruption in public institutions and a lack of effective legal frameworks to combat bribery and fraud.
New Zealand
In 2013, New Zealand achieved a remarkable rank of #2 with a Corruption Perceptions Index value of 91 among 176 countries. This score is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting New Zealand's strong commitment to transparency and governance. The country's robust legal framework, effective public institutions, and active civil society contribute to its low levels of perceived corruption, fostering a trustworthy environment for both citizens and businesses.
Eritrea
Eritrea had a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 20 in 2013, ranking #160 out of 176 countries. This score places Eritrea among the most corrupt nations globally, significantly lower than the regional average for East Africa. The pervasive corruption in Eritrea is largely attributed to the government's tight control over the economy and lack of political freedoms, which stifles transparency and accountability.
Australia
In 2013, Australia achieved a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 81 score, ranking #9 out of 176 countries. This score positions Australia significantly above the global average, reflecting its strong governance and low levels of corruption compared to many nations. Key factors contributing to this high ranking include robust legal frameworks, a transparent political system, and active civil society engagement in holding officials accountable.
Iraq
Iraq had a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 16 in 2013, ranking #170 out of 176 countries. This score placed Iraq among the lowest globally, significantly below the regional average for the Middle East and North Africa. The pervasive corruption in Iraq can be attributed to ongoing political instability, weak governance structures, and the aftermath of prolonged conflict, which have hampered effective anti-corruption measures.
Hungary
In 2013, Hungary achieved a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 54, ranking #47 out of 176 countries. This score is relatively moderate compared to the regional average in Central and Eastern Europe, indicating ongoing challenges in governance and transparency. Key factors influencing Hungary's perception of corruption include political instability, concerns over the independence of judicial institutions, and increased government control over media and civil society.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone had a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 30 in 2013, ranking #121 out of 176 countries. This score is significantly lower than the global average, indicating widespread corruption challenges. Key drivers of this perception include the country's post-civil war recovery struggles, weak institutional frameworks, and limited economic opportunities that exacerbate corrupt practices.
Spain
In 2013, Spain achieved a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 59, ranking #40 out of 176 countries. This score is notably lower than the European Union average, reflecting ongoing concerns about governance and public trust. Key drivers of Spain's perception of corruption include the aftermath of the financial crisis, which exposed vulnerabilities in political accountability and transparency, as well as scandals involving prominent political figures.
Haiti
In 2013, Haiti ranked #164 out of 176 countries with a Corruption Perceptions Index score of 19. This score places Haiti among the lowest globally, significantly below the regional average for the Caribbean, where countries typically score higher. Key factors contributing to this low score include ongoing political instability, weak governance structures, and a lack of accountability in public institutions.
Data Source
Corruption Perceptions Index | Our World in Data
The Corruption Perceptions Index, compiled by Transparency International and featured on Our World in Data, measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption in various countries. It provides country-level statistics that reflect the perceptions of businesspeople and experts regarding corruption, using a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Corruption Perceptions Index data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data