Academic Freedom Index 1926
Explore the Academic Freedom Index measuring educational liberties globally. Compare countries' scores, view rankings, and analyze historical trends.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
- #1
United Kingdom
- #2
Sweden
- #3
Australia
- #4
Netherlands
- #5
Finland
- #6
Uruguay
- #7
Latvia
- #8
Switzerland
- #9
Czech Republic
- #10
Slovakia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #101
South Korea
- #100
Uzbekistan
- #99
Turkmenistan
- #98
Tajikistan
- #97
Russia
- #96
Kyrgyzstan
- #95
Kazakhstan
- #94
Georgia
- #93
Belarus
- #92
Azerbaijan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Leading the Academic Freedom Index in 1926
The Academic Freedom Index for the year 1926 reveals that the United Kingdom ranks highest with a score of 0.915, while scores across the globe range from a low of 0.018 in South Korea to a high of 0.92. The global average score for academic freedom stands at 0.41, with a median score also at 0.41, highlighting a significant disparity in educational liberties worldwide.
Geopolitical Influences on Academic Freedom
The variations in the Academic Freedom Index scores can largely be attributed to geopolitical factors and historical contexts. Countries like the United Kingdom (0.915), Sweden (0.904), and Australia (0.858) benefit from longstanding democratic traditions that emphasize individual rights and educational liberties. In contrast, nations such as South Korea (0.018) and Russia (0.025) have experienced authoritarian governance, which stifles academic expression and limits educational freedoms. The historical context of these countries plays a crucial role; for instance, the aftermath of World War I and the political turbulence in Eastern Europe have significantly affected the academic landscapes in those regions.
Regional Disparities and Patterns
Regionally, the disparity in academic freedom is stark. Western European nations dominate the top rankings, with countries like the Netherlands (0.848) and Finland (0.846) reflecting a commitment to educational independence and research integrity. Conversely, Central Asian countries, including Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan, all scoring 0.025, illustrate the challenges posed by restrictive political regimes that limit academic inquiry and expression. This pattern indicates that democratic governance correlates positively with higher academic freedom scores, while authoritarian regimes consistently score lower.
Year-over-Year Changes and Movements
Examining the year-over-year changes, the data shows a marginal average decrease of 0.00 (0.2%). However, notable increases are observed in the Dominican Republic, which improved by 0.10 (60.1%), and Greece, which increased by 0.06 (27.2%). These increases suggest a gradual shift toward more liberal educational policies in these nations, potentially influenced by socio-political reforms or public demand for greater academic liberties. Conversely, Portugal saw the largest decline at -0.15 (-26.2%), alongside Lithuania and Poland both experiencing significant drops of -0.15 (-18.2%) and -0.14 (-18.7%), respectively. This decline illustrates the volatility in academic freedom, often contingent upon political stability and governance.
Conclusion: The Significance of Academic Freedom
The Academic Freedom Index of 1926 serves as both a reflection and a predictor of educational liberties globally. The stark differences in scores among countries underscore the importance of governance in shaping academic environments. As nations like the United Kingdom and Sweden continue to lead, it becomes evident that policies promoting democratic values and individual rights are crucial for fostering an atmosphere of academic freedom. Conversely, the low scores from countries such as South Korea and Russia highlight the ongoing struggles for educational liberties in more repressive regimes. Understanding these dynamics is vital for policymakers, educators, and advocates of academic freedom worldwide.
Data Source
Varieties of Democracy
Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) is a unique approach to conceptualizing and measuring democracy. V-Dem distinguishes between five high-level principles of democracy: electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative, and egalitarian, and collects data to measure these principles.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Academic Freedom Index data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More People and Society Facts
Currently married (Percent)
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
View dataBrowse All People and Society
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data