Public Sector Corruption Perception 2014
Assesses perceived corruption in public sectors, impacting government effectiveness and attracting global interest.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
- #1
Denmark
- #2
New Zealand
- #3
Finland
- #4
Sweden
- #5
Norway
- #6
Switzerland
- #7
Singapore
- #8
Netherlands
- #9
Luxembourg
- #10
Canada
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #174
Somalia
- #173
North Korea
- #172
Sudan
- #171
Afghanistan
- #170
South Sudan
- #169
Iraq
- #168
Turkmenistan
- #167
Uzbekistan
- #166
Libya
- #165
Eritrea
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In the 2014 assessment of Public Sector Corruption Perception, Denmark emerged as the least corrupt with a score of 92, while the most corrupt were Somalia and North Korea, both scoring 8. The global range for this perception index was from 8 to 92. The average score across the 174 countries surveyed was 43.33, providing a benchmark for understanding corruption in public sectors worldwide.
Understanding High and Low Perception Scores
The countries with the highest scores, such as Denmark (92), New Zealand (91), and Finland (89), share characteristics that include robust governance structures, transparency, and strong legal frameworks. These nations have consistently topped global governance indices and are known for their effective public service delivery. Their high scores reflect a public sector that is perceived as transparent and accountable.
Conversely, countries with the lowest scores, such as Somalia and North Korea (both 8), and Sudan (11), face challenges like political instability, weak institutions, and limited rule of law. These factors contribute to a perception of widespread corruption, hindering economic development and international investment. The low scores indicate a significant trust deficit in the public sector.
Impact of Economic and Geographic Factors
Economic stability and geographic location often play crucial roles in shaping corruption perception. For instance, Singapore (84) and Switzerland (86) have strong economies and are strategically located trade hubs, facilitating efficient governance and reducing corruption opportunities. Their economic success is partly attributed to transparent regulatory environments and effective anti-corruption policies.
On the other hand, Afghanistan (12) and Iraq (16) illustrate how conflict and economic challenges can exacerbate corruption perceptions. These countries struggle with rebuilding efforts, where corruption can undermine reconstruction and aid efforts, further affecting public trust.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
In 2014, several countries experienced significant shifts in their corruption perception scores. Egypt and Côte d'Ivoire each saw a notable increase of 5 points, reflecting efforts to improve governance and transparency post-political upheaval. These improvements, representing increases of 15.6% and 18.5% respectively, suggest positive steps towards reform and greater public sector trust.
Conversely, Turkey experienced the largest decline, dropping 5 points to reflect a 10% decrease. This decline could be attributed to political controversies and perceived erosion of judicial independence. Similarly, China and Rwanda saw declines of 4 points, indicating challenges in maintaining previous anti-corruption momentum.
Policy Implications and Global Interest
Public sector corruption perception is a critical indicator of a country's governance quality, impacting both domestic policy and international relations. High perception scores can enhance a country's attractiveness to foreign investors and international partners by signaling a stable and transparent business environment. For example, Canada (81) benefits from its reputation for low corruption, supporting its strong economic performance.
On the other hand, countries with low scores face hurdles in attracting investment and aid, as corruption can deter potential partners and undermine development goals. The international community closely monitors these scores to guide diplomatic relations and aid distribution, emphasizing the importance of combating corruption to foster sustainable growth and development.
Frequently Asked Questions About Public Sector Corruption Perception in 2014
Which country had the highest perceived public sector corruption score in 2014?
Denmark had the highest perceived public sector corruption score in 2014, with a score of 92.
Which country had the lowest perceived public sector corruption score in 2014?
Somalia had the lowest perceived public sector corruption score in 2014, with a score of 8.
What was the average perceived public sector corruption score in 2014?
The average perceived public sector corruption score in 2014 was 43.33.
What was the median perceived public sector corruption score in 2014?
The median perceived public sector corruption score in 2014 was 38.
What countries were in the top 10 for perceived public sector corruption scores in 2014?
The top 10 countries for perceived public sector corruption scores in 2014 were Denmark, New Zealand, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, Norway, Singapore, Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Canada.
What countries were in the bottom 10 for perceived public sector corruption scores in 2014?
The bottom 10 countries for perceived public sector corruption scores in 2014 were Somalia, North Korea, Sudan, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Iraq, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Libya, and Eritrea.
Insights by country
Singapore
In 2014, Singapore achieved a Public Sector Corruption Perception score of 84, ranking #7 out of 174 countries. This score is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting Singapore's strong commitment to transparency and governance. The nation's robust legal framework, strict anti-corruption laws, and effective enforcement agencies have played crucial roles in maintaining its reputation as one of the least corrupt countries globally.
Hungary
In 2014, Hungary had a Public Sector Corruption Perception of 54, ranking #49 out of 174 countries. This score was slightly above the regional average for Central and Eastern Europe, indicating a moderate level of perceived corruption. Key drivers of this perception include ongoing concerns about government transparency and the influence of political patronage in public administration.
Botswana
In 2014, Botswana achieved a Public Sector Corruption Perception score of 63, ranking #31 out of 174 countries. This score is notably higher than the regional average for Sub-Saharan Africa, indicating a relatively low level of perceived corruption compared to many neighboring countries. Key drivers of this perception include Botswana's strong democratic institutions and effective governance policies, which have fostered a culture of accountability and transparency.
Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan ranked #137 out of 174 countries in 2014 for Public Sector Corruption Perception, with a score of 27. This score is significantly lower than the global average, indicating widespread corruption concerns within the country. Key drivers of this perception include ongoing political instability and a lack of effective governance, which have hindered anti-corruption efforts and eroded public trust in institutions.
Iceland
In 2014, Iceland achieved a Public Sector Corruption Perception value of 79, ranking #13 out of 174 countries. This score is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a robust perception of integrity in public institutions. Factors contributing to this positive perception include Iceland's strong democratic governance, low levels of bureaucracy, and a high degree of transparency in public administration.
Slovakia
In 2014, Slovakia achieved a Public Sector Corruption Perception score of 50, ranking #54 out of 174 countries. This score reflects challenges in governance compared to the European Union average, where many countries score significantly higher. Key factors influencing Slovakia's perception of corruption include ongoing political reforms and public dissatisfaction with transparency in government dealings, which have been persistent issues since its independence.
Uganda
In 2014, Uganda had a Public Sector Corruption Perception value of 26, ranking #142 out of 174 countries. This score is notably lower than the global average, highlighting significant challenges in governance and transparency. Contributing factors include longstanding issues related to political instability, inadequate enforcement of anti-corruption laws, and a lack of public accountability mechanisms.
Somalia
In 2014, Somalia had a Public Sector Corruption Perception value of 8, ranking #174 out of 174 countries. This score places Somalia at the bottom of the global ranking, significantly lower than many of its regional neighbors, which often score in the double digits. The pervasive corruption in Somalia can be attributed to prolonged conflict, weak governance structures, and a lack of institutional capacity, which have impeded effective public administration and accountability.
Russia
In 2014, Russia had a Public Sector Corruption Perception of 27, ranking #140 out of 174 countries. This score places Russia significantly below the global average, highlighting the pervasive corruption issues faced within its public institutions. Key drivers of this perception include a lack of transparency in government operations, a history of authoritarian governance, and systemic inefficiencies that hinder accountability.
Republic of Moldova
In 2014, the Republic of Moldova had a Public Sector Corruption Perception score of 35, ranking #105 out of 174 countries. This score reflects significant challenges compared to regional peers, with neighboring Romania scoring higher in anti-corruption efforts. Factors contributing to Moldova's low perception of public sector integrity include a history of political instability, weak rule of law, and inadequate enforcement of anti-corruption laws.
Data Source
Corruption Perceptions Index | Our World in Data
The Corruption Perceptions Index, compiled by Transparency International and featured on Our World in Data, measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption in various countries. It provides country-level statistics that reflect the perceptions of businesspeople and experts regarding corruption, using a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Public Sector Corruption Perception data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Government Facts
Rule of Law Index by Country
Compare countries by Rule of Law percentile rank, reflecting confidence in laws, courts, police, property rights, and protection from crime and violence.
View dataBrowse All Government
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data