Psychiatrist Density Per 100,000 People 2019
Psychiatrist density measures the number of psychiatrists available per 100,000 people, indicating mental health access.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Lithuania | 20 per 100,000 people | |
2 | Netherlands | 17 per 100,000 people | |
3 | Estonia | 16 per 100,000 people | |
4 | Uruguay | 16 per 100,000 people | |
5 | Argentina | 15 per 100,000 people | |
6 | United Kingdom | 14 per 100,000 people | |
7 | Latvia | 13 per 100,000 people | |
8 | Russia | 13 per 100,000 people | |
9 | Hungary | 12 per 100,000 people | |
10 | Belarus | 11 per 100,000 people | |
11 | Palau | 11 per 100,000 people | |
12 | Andorra | 10 per 100,000 people | |
13 | Bulgaria | 10 per 100,000 people | |
14 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 9 per 100,000 people | |
15 | New Zealand | 9 per 100,000 people | |
16 | North Macedonia | 9 per 100,000 people | |
17 | Panama | 6 per 100,000 people | |
18 | Serbia | 6 per 100,000 people | |
19 | Ukraine | 6 per 100,000 people | |
20 | Brazil | 4 per 100,000 people | |
21 | Kazakhstan | 4 per 100,000 people | |
22 | Seychelles | 4 per 100,000 people | |
23 | United Arab Emirates | 4 per 100,000 people | |
24 | Azerbaijan | 3 per 100,000 people | |
25 | Dominican Republic | 3 per 100,000 people | |
26 | Mauritius | 3 per 100,000 people | |
27 | Republic of Moldova | 3 per 100,000 people | |
28 | Mongolia | 3 per 100,000 people | |
29 | Peru | 3 per 100,000 people | |
30 | Tunisia | 3 per 100,000 people | |
31 | Uzbekistan | 3 per 100,000 people | |
32 | Albania | 2 per 100,000 people | |
33 | Algeria | 2 per 100,000 people | |
34 | Armenia | 2 per 100,000 people | |
35 | Cabo Verde | 2 per 100,000 people | |
36 | Guyana | 2 per 100,000 people | |
37 | Kuwait | 2 per 100,000 people | |
38 | Marshall Islands | 2 per 100,000 people | |
39 | Oman | 2 per 100,000 people | |
40 | Paraguay | 2 per 100,000 people | |
41 | Qatar | 2 per 100,000 people | |
42 | Saint Lucia | 2 per 100,000 people | |
43 | South Africa | 2 per 100,000 people | |
44 | Trinidad and Tobago | 2 per 100,000 people | |
45 | Turkmenistan | 2 per 100,000 people | |
46 | Antigua and Barbuda | 1 per 100,000 people | |
47 | Fiji | 1 per 100,000 people | |
48 | Iraq | 1 per 100,000 people | |
49 | Jamaica | 1 per 100,000 people | |
50 | Kiribati | 1 per 100,000 people | |
51 | Lebanon | 1 per 100,000 people | |
52 | Malaysia | 1 per 100,000 people | |
53 | Micronesia (Fed. States of) | 1 per 100,000 people | |
54 | Morocco | 1 per 100,000 people | |
55 | Nepal | 1 per 100,000 people | |
56 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 per 100,000 people | |
57 | Sri Lanka | 1 per 100,000 people | |
58 | Thailand | 1 per 100,000 people | |
59 | Tonga | 1 per 100,000 people | |
60 | Venezuela | 1 per 100,000 people | |
61 | Vietnam | 1 per 100,000 people | |
62 | Afghanistan | 0 per 100,000 people | |
63 | Bangladesh | 0 per 100,000 people | |
64 | Benin | 0 per 100,000 people | |
65 | Bhutan | 0 per 100,000 people | |
66 | Botswana | 0 per 100,000 people | |
67 | Djibouti | 0 per 100,000 people | |
68 | Ecuador | 0 per 100,000 people | |
69 | Eritrea | 0 per 100,000 people | |
70 | Eswatini | 0 per 100,000 people | |
71 | Ethiopia | 0 per 100,000 people | |
72 | Gabon | 0 per 100,000 people | |
73 | Gambia | 0 per 100,000 people | |
74 | Ghana | 0 per 100,000 people | |
75 | Guatemala | 0 per 100,000 people | |
76 | Guinea | 0 per 100,000 people | |
77 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 per 100,000 people | |
78 | Haiti | 0 per 100,000 people | |
79 | Indonesia | 0 per 100,000 people | |
80 | Kenya | 0 per 100,000 people | |
81 | Liberia | 0 per 100,000 people | |
82 | Madagascar | 0 per 100,000 people | |
83 | Myanmar | 0 per 100,000 people | |
84 | Namibia | 0 per 100,000 people | |
85 | Pakistan | 0 per 100,000 people | |
86 | Papua New Guinea | 0 per 100,000 people | |
87 | Rwanda | 0 per 100,000 people | |
88 | Senegal | 0 per 100,000 people | |
89 | South Sudan | 0 per 100,000 people | |
90 | Syrian Arab Republic | 0 per 100,000 people | |
91 | Togo | 0 per 100,000 people | |
92 | Uganda | 0 per 100,000 people | |
93 | Vanuatu | 0 per 100,000 people | |
94 | Yemen | 0 per 100,000 people | |
95 | Zambia | 0 per 100,000 people | |
96 | Zimbabwe | 0 per 100,000 people |
- #1
Lithuania
- #2
Netherlands
- #3
Estonia
- #4
Uruguay
- #5
Argentina
- #6
United Kingdom
- #7
Latvia
- #8
Russia
- #9
Hungary
- #10
Belarus
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #96
Zimbabwe
- #95
Zambia
- #94
Yemen
- #93
Vanuatu
- #92
Uganda
- #91
Togo
- #90
Syrian Arab Republic
- #89
South Sudan
- #88
Senegal
- #87
Rwanda
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2019, Lithuania led the world in Psychiatrist Density Per 100,000 People with a density of 20 psychiatrists, while the global range spanned from 0 to 20 psychiatrists per 100,000 people. The average psychiatrist density worldwide was 3.20, reflecting significant disparities in mental health access across different regions.
Economic Influence on Psychiatrist Density
The distribution of psychiatrists globally often aligns with economic indicators. Wealthier countries tend to have higher psychiatrist densities due to better healthcare infrastructures and greater investment in mental health services. For instance, Netherlands and United Kingdom boast densities of 17 and 14 psychiatrists per 100,000 people, respectively. These countries have robust healthcare systems supported by strong economies, allowing for more substantial public and private investment in mental health resources.
Conversely, countries with lower economic outputs, such as Pakistan and Kenya, both reporting a psychiatrist density of 0, struggle to allocate sufficient resources to mental health services. Economic constraints in these regions often lead to prioritization of more immediate healthcare needs, leaving mental health services underfunded.
Geopolitical and Policy Factors
Government policies and historical contexts also play crucial roles in psychiatrist density. In Russia and Hungary, with densities of 13 and 12 respectively, the legacy of state-supported healthcare systems from the Soviet era continues to influence current mental health service structures. These countries have maintained relatively high numbers of psychiatrists despite economic transitions.
In contrast, countries with less centralized healthcare policies, or those experiencing political instability, often see lower psychiatrist densities. For instance, Myanmar and Liberia, both reporting zero density, face challenges in establishing comprehensive mental health policies amid other pressing national issues.
Impact of Urbanization on Psychiatrist Availability
Urbanization significantly impacts psychiatrist distribution, with urban areas typically offering better access to mental health professionals. In Argentina and Uruguay, where psychiatrist densities are 15 and 16 respectively, urban centers like Buenos Aires and Montevideo concentrate healthcare resources, including psychiatry. This urban concentration often leads to disparities in mental health access between urban and rural populations.
Countries with less urban development, such as Namibia and Benin, both at zero density, often lack the infrastructure necessary to support a significant number of mental health professionals. In these regions, rural populations face substantial barriers to accessing psychiatric care.
Regional Patterns and Cultural Perspectives
Regional cultural attitudes towards mental health can also affect psychiatrist density. In Eastern Europe, countries such as Lithuania and Estonia, with densities of 20 and 16 respectively, demonstrate a cultural acceptance and recognition of mental health issues, which supports higher psychiatrist densities.
In contrast, in parts of Africa and Asia, where countries like Bhutan and Bangladesh report zero density, cultural stigmas surrounding mental health can deter individuals from pursuing psychiatric careers or seeking mental health services. These cultural factors, combined with economic and policy challenges, contribute to the low psychiatrist densities observed.
Overall, the global landscape of psychiatrist density per 100,000 people in 2019 highlights the complex interplay of economic, policy, urbanization, and cultural factors influencing mental health access. Addressing these disparities requires targeted international cooperation and investment to improve mental health infrastructure and reduce the global gap in mental health care accessibility.
Frequently Asked Questions About Psychiatrist Density Per 100,000 People in 2019
Which country had the highest psychiatrist density per 100,000 people in 2019?
Lithuania had the highest psychiatrist density with 20 per 100,000 people in 2019.
What was the average psychiatrist density per 100,000 people across all countries in 2019?
The average psychiatrist density was 3.2 per 100,000 people in 2019 across all countries.
Which country had the lowest psychiatrist density per 100,000 people in 2019?
Pakistan had the lowest psychiatrist density with 0 per 100,000 people in 2019.
What was the median psychiatrist density per 100,000 people in 2019?
The median psychiatrist density was 1 per 100,000 people in 2019.
How many countries had a psychiatrist density of 0 per 100,000 people in 2019?
There were 10 countries with a psychiatrist density of 0 per 100,000 people in 2019.
Which countries were in the top 3 for psychiatrist density per 100,000 people in 2019?
The top 3 countries for psychiatrist density in 2019 were Lithuania with 20, Netherlands with 17, and Estonia with 16 per 100,000 people.
Insights by country
Lithuania
Lithuania achieved a remarkable rank of #1 in 2019 for Psychiatrist Density Per 100,000 People, with a density of 20 per 100,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's strong commitment to mental health services. The high density can be attributed to Lithuania's robust healthcare policies and investment in mental health resources, which prioritize access to psychiatric care for its population.
Mongolia
Mongolia ranks #27 globally with a psychiatrist density of 3 per 100,000 people in 2019. This figure is relatively low compared to higher-ranked countries, where the density can exceed 10 per 100,000. Contributing factors include Mongolia's vast geographic expanse, which complicates access to mental health services, and a healthcare system that has historically prioritized physical health over mental health. Additionally, economic challenges may limit investment in mental health resources.
Ukraine
In 2019, Ukraine had a psychiatrist density of 6 per 100,000 people, ranking #19 out of 96 countries. This figure is notably above the global average, highlighting a relatively strong focus on mental health services compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Ukraine's emphasis on mental health reform and increased access to psychiatric care following years of conflict and social change.
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom ranked #6 globally in 2019 for Psychiatrist Density Per 100,000 People, with a value of 14 per 100,000 people. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the UK's robust healthcare system and commitment to mental health services. Factors such as substantial government investment in mental health care and a well-established framework for psychiatric training contribute to this high density.
Republic of Moldova
In 2019, the Republic of Moldova had a psychiatrist density of 3 per 100,000 people, ranking #28 out of 96 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in mental health care accessibility. Contributing factors include limited healthcare funding and a shortage of trained professionals, which affect the availability of mental health services in the country.
Antigua and Barbuda
In 2019, Antigua and Barbuda ranked #46 globally with a psychiatrist density of 1 per 100,000 people. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting a broader trend in the Caribbean where mental health resources are often limited. Contributing factors include the small population size and economic constraints that can hinder the development of specialized healthcare services, particularly in mental health.
Afghanistan
In 2019, Afghanistan had a psychiatrist density of 0 per 100,000 people, ranking #62 out of 96 countries. This figure is significantly lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting a critical shortage of mental health professionals in the region. Ongoing conflict, economic instability, and limited healthcare infrastructure have severely hindered the development of mental health services in Afghanistan.
Jamaica
In 2019, Jamaica had a psychiatrist density of 1 per 100,000 people, ranking #51 out of 96 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in mental health service accessibility. Contributing factors include limited healthcare funding and a shortage of trained mental health professionals, which can hinder effective treatment and support for mental health issues within the population.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
In 2019, Bosnia and Herzegovina had a psychiatrist density of 9 per 100,000 people, ranking #14 out of 96 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a relatively strong availability of mental health professionals compared to many other nations. The country's emphasis on mental health services can be attributed to the need for psychological support following the conflicts in the 1990s, which has shaped its healthcare policies and priorities.
Latvia
In 2019, Latvia achieved a remarkable global rank of #7 with a psychiatrist density of 13 per 100,000 people. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Latvia's robust mental health care initiatives compared to many countries. The strong emphasis on mental health awareness and government investment in psychiatric services have contributed to this density, highlighting Latvia's commitment to addressing mental health issues effectively.
Data Source
Our World in Data
Our World in Data is a collaborative effort between researchers at the University of Oxford, who are the scientific editors of the website content; and the UK-based nonprofit organization Global Change Data Lab (GCDL), which publishes and maintains the website and the data tools that make our work possible.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Psychiatrist Density Per 100,000 People data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.